Article 6. The Big Bang Theory = WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT: ‘Twas the Day and Night Before God Got Out of Bed, Father Time Was Santa Claus No Cap, Gravity Was Settled for a Long Winter’s Nap, and Light Was Trapped in the Upside-Down State, So the Universe Was Empty With No Body in Sight, Then God Stretched and Said, “LET THERE BE LIGHT!”

Fast-forward to the present 🎁 day and night 

And away to the iPad I flew like a flash

Opened-up a window, and threw up my lunch

When what to my wondering eyes did appear on a YouTube clip 

But THE GRINCH! 

And it was a vision in Technicolor c. 1966 with a re-make in 2000 to boot: 

“How the Grinch Stole Christmas!” 

Ft. the titular star driving a very good dog named Max

Slaving alone with the entire under-world’s weight on his own little back  

While the sunlight shining on the snowmen below 

Caused me to deduce a new fact and say to my cats:

“D’oh! God is like many snowmen all lined-up next to each other in rows, forming the shape of a sphere!” 

And also I said to myself:

“I bet I could explain what I mean in a bunch of quick steps.

And how cool is that? 

Every sub-atomic particle in the universe has its own control force and gravity force to just whip it and whip it good!” 

Then my imagination went from low gear to high    

And I knew that the Santa Clause in the Laws of Physics 

Was here to save Christmas from the Grinch’s attempt to steal it doggy style.

Sure as dry leaves before the hurricane fly 

When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky 

There was a sleigh full of toys and St. Nicholas 

With a small herd of reindeer all cut from the same cloth and determined to protect Max!

Closer-up I could see that Master G was dressed all in baby seal fur, from his head to his foot

And he wore a backpack with a George Foreman Grill box poking out of the top.

Given his years

The beard of his chin should have been as white as the hairs on the crown of my head

But it was an unnatural shade of brown instead.

So, “Maybe it’s Maybelline?” I said

Or alternatively, “Perhaps it’s Just For Men?” 

And I laughed in spite of having a lot to dread from that dyed-in-the-wool chonky old wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Then in the moonlight I watched him B&E into the house 

And rifle through my computer files as quiet as a mouse

Before he finally put a finger inside of his nose

And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose.

After I lit the Yuletide log in the fireplace and walked into the kitchen

I heard him exclaim:

“NO LIKES FOR YOU, ST. WITCH!”

At the same time I saw St. Nicholas spring to his sleigh, to his team give a whistle

And away they all flew like the down of a thistle

But I thought I heard him announce just before they went out of sight:

“Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night!”

WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT  

Once upon a time God was in bed, 

then he made a decision to turn his life around—

because his body is made of spinning Timeyne particles that are like Tippe Tops that he can tip over with a little 3-d Mindful Stretching— 

but God knew he couldn’t do any stretching until he was ready to create the universe,

because after he tipped over his Tippe Top Timeyne body then the spinning Lumeyne particles in the lower dimension that he had been holding down by facing head-down would tip over too and be launched like rockets out of their own beds never to return,

but finally the day came when God finished planning everything to be 100 fair to everyone, 

and he had to stop dreaming and get out of bed and begin creating, 

which was surely a frightening and daunting moment-of-no-return for him,

like that is a lot of responsibility and there’s no room for error in all of forever and he never did any of it before it was all theoretical before that one fateful morning,

so now we know that he simply 5 4 3 2 1’d it https://www.facebook.com/melrobbins/videos/523595546851117 

then he just started doing the 3-d Mindful Stretching that was necessary to tip over his Tippe Top Timeyne body so that his head would be pointing up instead of down,

and BANG! the light rockets (the Lumeyne particles) tipped over too, 

and they were off to the races,

and by God 14 billion years later here we all are!

How ‘bout them apples?

How about “WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT” for accurate *supplementary* vocabulary to describe what is colloquially called “The Big Bang,” which everybody on earth knows is a reference the “Creation Story“ according to SCIENCE, as opposed to RELIGION.  

WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT was a MOVEMENT (a “getting out of bed” event) of previously-stationary (“asleep”) Lumeyne particles that caused the Lumeyne particles to go from one position to another position. 

The MOVEMENT (the “getting out of bed” event) was caused by the change in direction of force that the Timeyne particles were applying to the Lumeyne particles in individual Snowmen of God (the applied Timeyne force went from Backward to Forward), so the Lumeyne particles that were previously-stationary suddenly started moving Forward. 

The Lumeyne particles from which everything in the universe was made were neither created nor destroyed, they were always one part of the 3-part Eternal multi-dimensional entity called God. 

The universe was not created out of something SMALL, the universe was created out of something BIGGER THAN THE UNIVERSE that went from one state (“particles in bed”) to another state (“particles out of bed”) because of ONE DELIBERATE INTERNAL DECISION THAT THE JESUS/GOD THE FATHER, aka FATHER TIME, PART OF GOD MADE to change states (to “tip over.”)  

THIS IS WHAT WE’RE GOING TO SEE IN THIS ARTICLE.

FIELD TRIP!

Picture this: Disembarking from The Polar Express to do some sightseeing down under.    

DESTINATION: The swivel-chair—the Tippe Top chair, in fact, at the base of Reality, at the Beginning and the End, the Alpha and the Omega, the location of Timeless Father Time—with full control over every particle in the universe at your fingertips.

Do you remember the scene in the movie “Lucy” when Lucy was sitting in a swivel-chair, “turning around” and causing the world to “stand still” at the NOW of her choice?  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LWG3aFFhg8k&pp=ygUMI2x1Y3l0cmF2ZWxz 

The thought projects in this Article are taking us to that very same “control room of God” to WAKE THE SLEEPING GIANT, which means to bear witness to the way things were when God was “asleep” in the upside-down state, then 5-4-3-2-1’d it and “got out of bed” to cause the universe as we know it to begin to form.  

Proceeding step-by-step, we’ll get to God’s control room in our minds regardless of where our bodies are, and I promise you that the view from there will be worth the effort!

And we are already 100 prepared for the trip! 

But let’s do a TWO-STEP RE-CAP of where we left-off discussing MOTION in Article 5, just to reassure ourselves that we are equipped.

HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF STEP 1, ft. Dr. Jordan Peterson interviewing Dr. Spencer Klavan about Isaac Newton (to hear Dr. Spencer Klavan speaking about his own book, “Light of the Mind, Light of the World,” see the interview “Science Is Leading Us Back to Belief”; I have not yet read the book, but based-on the description, I am planning to read it after I finish writing-up the TOEWC, to ensure that I adequately addressed all the “hot topics” in philosophy and physics, since I know more about television and movie stars from the late 1900s than I know about the history of star-gazing):  

Dr. Spencer Klavan: “When Newton came up with his Laws, there was a widespread belief, derived from Aristotle, that there were TWO SETS OF RULES FOR THE PHYSICAL WORLD—it was called ‘the super-lunary and the sub-lunary spheres’—it was named that because the barrier was supposed to be at the moon, where the moon’s orbit is

 [people thought that where the moon’s orbit is] there starts…a whole new set of laws….

[W]hat Newton does is he shatters the barrier between the sub-lunary and the super-lunary spheres…[and he says:] 

‘Now here’s the THREE RULES that will govern not only the arc of a comet across the sky, but the descent of an apple from a tree.’

Why did Newton have any right to expect that he could do that? Why were people working on that problem at that time?

[Answer:] It’s because of the assumptions that you [Dr. Jordan Peterson] are describing: That the world is not only a logos….but also that [the] logos is answerable to the patterns that are in our minds.”

Me: And we have seen that the common pattern in everyone’s mind is the soul of the universe, aka the 6th dimension Jesus/God the Father, aka Father Time, part of God.

Also me: [also Dr. Klavan cites the same problem] We have also seen that what we have *again* in science are TWO SETS OF RULES FOR THE PHYSICAL WORLD—one is called the General Theory of Relativity and the other is called Quantum Mechanics—with the General Theory of Relativity only being applicable in ”the macro realm” of massive objects, and with Quantum Mechanics only being applicable in “the micro realm” of atoms and sub-atomic particles.

But what I’m saying—which no one else is saying yet in a way that EXPLAINS EVERYTHING—is that both the General Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics were “wrong turns” in science, and in fact, NEWTON’S FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD LAWS govern *both* “the macro realm” and “the micro realm.”

So here we are: Becoming witnesses to history repeating itself as we step-by-step destroy the Godless false separation between two realms that are in fact governed by the same Laws of Physics that Isaac Newton discovered, and we are going to confirm Isaac Newton’s conclusion that “the world is not only a logos, but also [the] logos is answerable to the patterns that are in our minds,” which begin inside the control room of the universe with God!

HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF STEP 2, and here I am quoting myself from the end of Article 5:

“NOW ‘spacetime’ is FINALLY eating stardust, and…[we must] EXPLAIN HOW TO PRACTICALLY USE Newton’s Third Law of Motion to do the Git Up down here, which, as discussed in Article 3, means to EITHER: (a) get moving Up, which is Forward (and all 3-d Forward movement occurs according to Newton’s First Law of Motion or Newton’s Second Law of Motion); OR (b) get moving Down, which is Backward (there’s only one way to go Down, or Backward, and in 3-d, that’s with gravitational acceleration) according to the Ready Set GO! Moving Process;

I call THE RULES (the Laws of Physics) that govern when and how Newton’s Third Law of Motion must be satisfied [meaning when actions require equal-and-opposite reactions, and how those reactions are generated] the ‘Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics,’ or TPTPTP (sounds like ‘Tippe Tippe Tippe’)….

…It’s a simple matter of a particle being structured like a turtle—with a hard shell on the outside and soft part on the inside that moves the shell around—and every turtle-particle having to pay two taxes in the form of wave-energy:

(i) one tax on the internal DIY “idling” force that hauls mass (or in other words Fmass, aka the “inertial force,” which spins the particle right round or left round and is constantly expressed as wave-particle duality), and

(ii) a second tax on the moving services received from other turtle-particles that help the particle “get into gear” and haul mass in the same direction in which the other turtle-particles are heading (see “Tortoise Helps His Friend Who Got Turned Over”), or in other words, external physical forces that act-on the particle. 

The first tax—the payment in wave-energy that is equivalent to the *internal* inertial “idling” physical force of Fmass that hauls mass by spinning the particle right round or left round—is constantly generated.

It is actually the tax (the wave-energy) being THRUST out of the particle bottom that CAUSES the top, or head, of the particle to *apply physical force* in the opposite direction (spin right round or left round while applying physical force in a certain direction along a line, with the direction depending-on the Natural direction of rotation of the particle.)

The second tax—the payment in wave-energy for moving services received from other turtle-particles that help the particle “get into gear” and haul mass in the same direction in which the other turtle-particles are heading—is in fact the equal-and-opposite force that is generated to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to being acted-on with *external* physical force.

It is actually the tax (the wave-energy) being THRUST out of the particle that CAUSES the top, or head, of the particle to *apply physical force*, and that’s why the particle “gets into gear” and hauls mass in the same direction in which the MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER is heading.

THOSE ARE ‘THE RULES’ in the Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics (TPTPTP), which explains PARTICLE MOVEMENT at the Big Bang and beyond.   

Man we live it up down here without jack; we’ve got what we’ve got and we don’t need beer or fishing hooks on our eco-friendly yachts.”

So let’s begin the FIELD TRIP. 

WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT with logical support is THE DESTINATION.

To get there, we have to “get God into bed” in our minds.

And that’s easy, but it’s two-pronged process. 

First we have to ENABLE the Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics, or TPTPTP. 

To ENABLE the TPTPTP we have to logically-support A VISION of one Snowman of God comprised-of three particles that are like tax-paying turtles.

That’s THINK #1 we have to-do to get God into bed.

Then comes THINK #2 we have to-do to get God into bed:

Apply the TPTPTP we enabled in THINK #1 to logically-support A VISION of THE SLEEPING GIANT, which means A VISION of one Snowman of God comprised-of three particles that are like tax-paying turtles IN THE UPSIDE-DOWN “ASLEEP” STATE, explaining STEP-BY-STEP the forceful causes that kept God “in bed.” 

That will bring us to the threshold of our DESTINATION, which is WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT, or in other words, logically-supporting A VISION of one Snowman of God comprised-of three particles that are like tax-paying turtles IN THE “AWAKE” STATE, explaining STEP-BY-STEP the forceful causes that got God “out of bed” and moving, i.e., the forceful causes of THE BIG BANG.  

Let’s call that THINK #3: Logically-supporting A VISION of THE BIRTH OF THE UNIVERSE.

Welcome to THINK #1:  

Logically-support A VISION of one Snowman of God comprised-of three particles that are like tax-paying turtles.

What we’ve got so far is that a particle is like a turtle, having a hard shell on the outside and soft part on the inside that moves the shell around.   

A particle’s physical particle-side force is like the turtle’s shell, and a particle’s immaterial wave-energy that moves the particle around is like the soft part on the inside of the turtle (aka THE ENERGY OF MASS) that moves the shell around.

The particle-force and the wave-energy together are the particle’s expression of its internal energy of mass, aka Fmass, with the particle-force and the wave-energy always being applied in opposite directions along a particle’s own Absolute Direction Line (“ADL.”)

Fmass is a particle’s Natural internal “inertial” force, which simply means that Fmass is an “idling” force, which is the “at-rest” condition of every particle.

So we can think about a particle’s constant expression of its own wave-particle duality as being like a “100% tax” that *the particle pays* for “HAULING MASS,” or in other words, for HAVING THE INTERNAL FORCE OF MASS, aka FMASS, which has the constant effect of trying to make the particle move in a certain direction, and in particular, to move in the direction of the particle-force, which is the opposite direction as the wave-energy, along the particle’s own ADL.  

Here RECALL from Article 3 the “Hierarchy of Relativity” diagram of the 3-part multi-dimensional entity called “God”:

The 6th dimension CONTROL part of God is the Jesus/God the Father part of God, aka Father Time.  

ALSO RECALL from Article 5 the description of the ADL, defining the Absolute Forward direction and the Absolute Backward direction for each particle in the multi-dimensional entity called “God”:

FURTHER RECALL the vocabulary we adopted in Article 5-–Lumeynes in the 4-d light part of God, Gravitynes in the 5-d gravity part of God and Timeynes in the 6-d Father Time part of God—to refer-to the three types of PARTICLES that are LINED-UP one-on-top-of-the-other in a MULTI-DIMENSIONAL COLUMN along the same multi-dimensional ADL “backbone”—the “ADL Backbone,” let’s say—making them look-like marshmallow snowmen on a stick (hence the term “Snowman of God” to refer-to each set of three particles along the same ADL Backbone), with each ADL Backbone being RELATIVE-TO THE COM OF FATHER TIME, who is “the Beginning and the End” of the Eternal multi-dimensional entity of God.

Let’s continue naming things that we’ve already defined; let’s call the particle-force of a Lumeyne “Ff” (I don’t think the term “Fl” is practical because it’s ambiguous, whereas the alternative term “Ff” provides a helpful reminder that the force of light is Naturally FORWARD-ACTING), and let’s call the particle-force of a Gravityne “Fg,” and finally, let’s call the particle-force of a Timeyne “Ft.” 

RECALL the Truism (see Article 3, Part Two of the Two-Part Relativity Thought Experiment) that a higher-dimension part of God can act—meaning apply a PHYSICAL FORCE, aka a PARTICLE-FORCE—upon a lower-dimension part of God, but not vice-versa.

A FIRST COROLLARY to the Truism that a higher-dimension part of God can apply PHYSICAL FORCE upon a lower-dimension part of God but not vice-versa is that a lower-dimension part of God must be able to apply an EQUAL-AND-OPPOSITE NON-PHYSICAL FORCE to a higher-dimension part of God TO SATISFY NEWTON’S THIRD LAW OF MOTION in reaction to being acted-upon with physical force.

A SECOND COROLLARY to the Truism that a higher-dimension part of God can apply PHYSICAL FORCE upon a lower-dimension part of God but not vice-versa is that a Timeyne would never have an occasion to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion, because being in the 6th dimension a Timeyne is at the Beginning and the End of Reality, sitting atop the “Wall of Reality”, so to speak, which we must presume is the origin of consciousness, including Father Time’s SELF, aka WILL (the SOURCE OF DISCRETIONARY THOUGHT.)

THE FIRST COROLLARY allows us to deduce in SIX mini-steps that WAVE-ENERGY is the equal-and-opposite force that is generated whenever it is necessary to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to being acted-on by external physical force.

Check it out: 

Mini-step 1. Every happy camper holds THE PIEZOELECTRIC EFFECT to be Self-evident.

According to Google, “the piezoelectric effect is the ability of…materials to generate an electric charge when mechanical stress is applied to them.”

NOTE that I’m not going to link-to any scientific authorities that explain the PIEZOELECTRIC EFFECT in “conventional terms” for two reasons: 

The first reason is that all the sources in “modern science” right now assume facts-not-in-evidence about ELECTRONS; modern science claims that electrons are matter, but we haven’t yet shown how matter was made from Lumeynes, so we don’t even know what matter is, exactly, yet! 

The second reason is that all the sources in modern science assume that PHOTONS exist and become “entangled” with each other, but we proved in Article 4 that the “entanglement” conclusion is non-sensical because we know that the speed of light is Absolute, and what is Absolute cannot be relative-to (become “entangled with”) itself.

Mini-step 2. The Piezoelectric Effect *raises the possibility* that ALL equal-and-opposite REACTIONS to the ACTIONS of external physical forces that are applied to MATTER comprise ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-ENERGY.

Mini-step 3. We must conclude that the ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-ENERGY that is observed in the Piezoelectric Effect is coming from Lumeynes, because we know that matter was made from the light part of God (see Article 1.)

Mini-step 4. But if we take-away matter—if we consider the reaction of a Lumeyne when it is acted-upon by the particle-force of a Gravityne, Fg, or the particle-force of a Timeyne, Ft, within the same Snowman of God—then we see that wave-energy generated by the Lumeyne is the ONLY POSSIBILITY we have to explain how a Lumeyne satisfies Newton’s Third Law of Motion.

Mini-step 5. This CONFIRMS THE FIRST COROLLARY that the wave-energy that a lower-dimension particle generates as it expresses its own wave-particle duality must be receivable-by a higher-dimension particle, AND it compels us to conclude that the wave-energy generated by a lower-dimension particle must be the equivalent (or at least a sub-set) of the wave-energy generated by a higher-dimension particle; 

in other words, the conclusion must be that every particle in the 3-part multi-dimensional entity called God must contain the same electromagnetic wave-energy, aka LIGHT.

Mini-step 6. Now we can say for certain that the possibility raised in Mini-step 2 is TRUE! We can say for certain that matter (which is made from Lumeynes, see Mini-step 3) must ALWAYS satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion by generating equal-and-opposite wave-energy, because a Lumeyne is the ONLY POSSIBILITY we have to explain how a Lumeyne satisfies Newton’s Third Law of Motion (see Mini-step 4.)

End of the SIX mini-steps.

Let’s create some additional vocabulary to refer-to the wave-energy of each type of particle: Let’s call the wave-energy of a Lumeyne “Ef” and the wave-energy of a Gravityne “Eg”and the wave-energy of a Timeyne “Et”.

And we can’t forget about Fmass! 

We must conclude (see Article 5) that every particle INHERENTLY has the “inertial,” or “idling,” force of mass, aka Fmass—or in other words the energy it takes to haul the particle’s mass, which is the price (aka the “100% tax”) that the particle must continually pay to exist—and Fmass is constantly expressed as the particle’s wave-particle duality. 

So let’s get more specific with our Fmass vocabulary and call the Fmass of a Lumeyne “Fmass(L)” and the Fmass of a Gravityne “Fmass(G)” and the Fmass of a Timeyne “Fmass(T)”.

Now RECALL (see Article 3) that a Lumeyne’s particle-force Ff is Forward-acting (this means that the effect of Ff is to try to get an acted-upon particle—either an external particle to which Ff is applied (here we NOTICE that there are no Eternal particles in the 3rd dimension) *or* a Lumeyne itself experiencing its own Fmass(L)—to move in the same direction as the Lumeyne is heading), and we know that a Gravityne’s particle-force Fg is Backward-acting (this means that the effect of Fg is to try to get an acted-upon particle—either an external particle (a Lumeyne) to which Fg is applied *or* a Gravityne itself experiencing Fmass(G)—to move in the same direction as the Gravityne is heading), and we know that a Timeyne’s particle-force Ft must be capable of being BOTH Forward-acting AND Backward-acting to account-for LUMEYNES BEING STATIONARY BEFORE THE BIG BANG and LUMEYNES MOVING FORWARD AT THE BIG BANG. 

Boom! 

All we have left to do to ENABLE the TPTPTP is to NOTE two additional FACTS that we already know:

(1) at any given time, a particle (and the center-of-mass of a larger object comprised-of particles) can only move or attempt to move in ONE DIRECTION, which must be the direction in which NET FORCE is being experienced at the given time;

and

(2) in addition to the force of a particle’s own “mass hauling”—the inertial (or “idling”) force of Fmass that a particle is always experiencing as its own wave-particle duality—which is trying to cause the particle to move in a certain direction along the particle’s own ADL (and again: Ff tries to cause movement in the Absolute Forward direction, Fg tries to cause movement in the Absolute Backward direction, and Ft is capable of trying to cause movement in BOTH the Absolute Forward direction AND the Absolute Backward direction), a particle may also be ACTED-ON by EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCES (which means EXTERNAL PARTICLE-FORCES) that are APPLIED-TO the particle, and those sources of external physical forces are trying to “get the particle in gear,” i.e., trying to get the particle move in the same DIRECTION as the sources are moving. 

So it’s as if every particle is like a tax-paying turtle living in “God’s country,” which is a Totalitarian state with a 100% tax-rate, wherein tax payable in wave-energy is due upon receipt of taxable receivables, and there are TWO TAXABLE RECEIVABLES: 

(i) internal inertial force that is trying to haul mass in a certain direction along the particle’s ADL; 

so in this case the wave-energy (and again, the wave-energy of a Lumeyne is called Ef and the wave-energy of a Gravityne is called Eg and the wave-energy of a Timeyne is called Et) is the constantly-paid tax on the benefit of “being,” aka “idling” (the force of Fmass) that’s being received all the time, and it is actually the wave-energy being THRUST out of the particle bottom that CAUSES the top, or head, of the particle to *apply physical force* in the opposite direction;

and 

(ii) moving services received from other turtle-particles that try to “get the particle into gear” to haul mass in the same direction in which the other turtle-particles are heading (see “Tortoise Helps His Friend Who Got Turned Over”), or in other words, external physical forces (in the case of a Lumeyne, Fg and Ft); 

so in this case the particle has to concurrently satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion by generating equal-and-opposite wave-energy (see Mini-step 4 and Mini-step 6, and NOTE that directly below we will select vocabulary for this wave-energy), which is the tax that is paid upon receipt of the moving services, and it is actually the wave-energy being THRUST out of the particle that CAUSES the top, or head, of the particle to *apply physical force*, and that’s why the particle “gets into gear” and hauls mass in the same direction in which the MOVING SERVICE PROVIDER is heading.

NOTE that it is impossible to WAIT until after a force is “over” before paying the wave-energy tax—in other words, physical ACTIONS must immediately cause equal-and-opposite REACTIONS—because there is no certain end-time of a force and the particle’s existence gives it a constant mandate to move or attempt to move NOW based-on the NET FORCE it is experiencing NOW.

ALSO NOTE, however, that to guarantee Conservation of Energy, all MOVEMENT in the universe—regardless of the distance traveled and regardless of whether or not the movement includes a CHANGE OF DIRECTION and regardless of the size or SHAPE of a moving object—must happen synchronously, IN THE SAME FIXED AMOUNT OF TIME.

The only way to meet all of those conditions is if ALL MOTION FROM POINT A TO POINT B IS LINEAR (in other words, there’s no such thing as an object “turning” during movement from point A to point B, although ROTATION AROUND AN AXIS is possible), *and* if CAUSES OF MOTION AND THE MOTION ITSELF OCCUR IN ONE FIXED-LENGTH INTERVAL OF TIME (this is the concept of Absolute Time, which was a foundational assumption of Isaac Newton.) 

QUESTION: In Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity, how is Conservation of Energy satisfied if time is relative and dependent on motion?

ANSWER:

QUESTION: What, exactly, is wrong with that conclusion?

ANSWER: Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity is based-on dual assumptions: (1) the speed of light is Absolute; AND (2) light particles (“photons”) MOVE RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER. 

The fatal logical problem is that those two assumptions (light’s speed is Absolute AND light particles move relative-to each other) are CONTRADICTORY, because it’s impossible for a singular thing—an Absolute thing—to become relative-to (dependent-on) itself without creating an infinite regress error, i.e., without causing the Absolute thing to become dependent-on A GREATER THING FOR ITS EXISTENCE, so then that greater thing must also be dependent-on a GREATER GREATER THING, and so on and on. ABSOLUTE MEANS ABSOLUTE, NOT RELATIVE! In a word, “ABSOLUTE” MEANS “ETERNAL,” NOT CREATED! 

EINSTEIN CONSISTENTLY AND PERSISTENTLY RE-DEFINED “ABSOLUTE” TO MEAN “RELATIVE”; in another example of that “trick,” we see Einstein underpin the General Theory of Relativity with the assumption that “gravitational waves”—which are not light—travel at the same speed as light.

QUESTION: If the speed of light is Absolute, then why do we need to distinguish the speed of light in a vacuum from the speed of light in another medium?

ANSWER: We don’t! That’s yet ANOTHER EXAMPLE of how Einstein consistently and persistently re-defined “ABSOLUTE” TO MEAN “RELATIVE”; in the case of “the speed of light in a vacuum” supposedly being different from “the speed of light in a material medium,” there are TWO ASSUMPTIONS being made: 

(1) it is being assumed that LIGHT TRAVELS THROUGH MATTER (as opposed to light merely acting-upon matter like a physical force would do); 

and 

(2) it is being assumed that MATTER CAN ACT-UPON LIGHT AND CHANGE ITS SPEED AND DIRECTION, which is the same thing as saying that LIGHT IS RELATIVE-TO MATTER; and in fact, Arthur Eddington famously formalized this conclusion in 1919 when he used Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity to predict that the enormous mass of the sun—the sun’s gravitational effect—would cause the trajectory of a LIGHT BEAM FROM ANOTHER STAR to “bend,” then Eddington conducted an EXPERIMENT DURING A SOLAR ECLIPSE, to supposedly prove Einstein’s theory correct. 

QUESTION: But how, pray tell, can we argue with Arthur Eddington’s OBSERVATIONS?

ANSWER: Simply NOTICE that light’s Absolute speed compels the conclusion that the motion of MATTER is RELATIVE-TO the motion of LIGHT, *and* ALSO NOTICE that celestial bodies are moving RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER. That situation is *necessarily* going to cause VARIOUS OBSERVATIONAL ILLUSIONS to arise in THE MATTER OF OUR EYES AND ALL OTHER MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS! We’ve got to USE OUR MIND to determine whether our OBSERVATIONS can be taken at “face value” or not.

Albert Einstein himself famously proved IN A SIMPLE “LIGHTNING STRIKES TWICE ON A TRAIN” THOUGHT-EXPERIMENT that OBSERVATIONAL ILLUSIONS ABOUND WHEN OBSERVING LIGHT.

In this thought-experiment, Einstein posited two observers in different locations relative-to a train moving at constant velocity—one observer sitting in the exact center of the train, and a second observer standing stationary on the side of the train tracks at the mid-point of the train—and Einstein NOTED that the observers were definitely going to DISAGREE about the timing of two “lighting bolts” that in fact struck the front of the train and the back of the train simultaneously, with the on-train observer seeing the lightning bolt at the front of the train STRIKING FIRST, but with the off-train observer perceiving the lightning bolts STRIKING AT THE SAME TIME.

The “LIGHTNING STRIKES TWICE ON A TRAIN” thought experiment should have called into question Arthur Eddington’s observations, and the fact that Eddington’s observations supposedly proved something about the General Theory of Relativity should have made the General Theory of Relativity sus! 

BUT EINSTEIN TRIED TO HIDE HIS REPETITIVE LOGICAL FALLACY OF RE-DEFINING THE ABSOLUTE TO BE RELATIVE—which, if corrected, would destroy both the Special Theory of Relativity AND the General Theory of Relativity—WITH “MATH” THAT IS ESSENTIALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR A LAY PERSON TO “READ,” LET ALONE “ARGUE WITH,” and in fact, there’s not even any argument to be made that THE MATH IS WRONG; the math is right! 

Dr. Spencer Klavan: When we see math, we think we’re looking at something universally valid, and something that not only hangs to together in our brains, but will also send a rocket ship to Mars.

But to repeat the problem: EINSTEIN’S MATH MAKES THE ABSOLUTE (GOD) IMPOSSIBLE TO EXIST! 

Fack that!! Next!!!

QUESTION: No seriously, it’s easy to say “Fack that!! Next!!!” but it’s NOT SATISFYING to say that, because Einstein’s math is masterful—an unsurpassable mental achievement—it’s only his contradictory assumptions about light being both ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE-TO ITSELF AND TO OTHER THINGS that are impossibly false/circular logic, so then the question becomes: WITHOUT LYING (which is not an intellectually-interesting case to contemplate), HOW WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE FOR EINSTEIN TO BE SO PERFECTLY CONSISTENT MATHEMATICALLY—and also be able to use the terms RELATIVE and ABSOLUTE fluently—YET CONTRADICT THE ACTUAL *MEANING* OF “ABSOLUTE,” AND THEREBY MAKE BOTH OF HIS THEORIES OF *RELATIVITY* SCIENTIFICALLY MOOT?

ANSWER: If Einstein was a Satan-controlled ROBOCOP (see Article 1), then that’s how the situation would be possible; that’s not to say that it would be impossible for Einstein to have had Free Will, but if Free Will was the case, then I would say that we would be looking at the product of a “Faustian bargain,” because the “pure contradiction” combined with a completely novel theory of God’s laws would seem to be a “mindprint” (like a fingerprint) of Satan’s mind. As discussed in Article 1, Satan can’t see the Absolute number (Pi), because Satan’s number (Zero) is THE ABSENCE OF EVERY DIGIT OF THE ABSOLUTE NUMBER, and so Satan’s ability to “empathize” with the Absolute—including his ability to see the universe from the POV of the Creator, Father Time—is not merely “impaired,” the ability is NON-EXISTENT! So therefore it may have SEEMED entirely RATIONAL to QUANTIFY the Absolute, and then proceed to “talk about the Absolute QUANTITATIVELY,” i.e., IN WAYS THAT COULD BE SUPPORTED *MATHEMATICALLY*. All he needed was MATHEMATICAL CONSISTENCY after he saw that the Absolute could be Eternal yet FINITE IN QUANTITY (e.g., as a “speed.”) Then upon leaving the PHYSICAL REALM and entering the NUMERICAL REALM, he might not even have SEEN the infinite regress problem that arose by making the Absolute relative-to itself, because after you QUANTIFY the Absolute numerically, you can’t see the problem, and in fact, THERE IS NO LOGICAL PROBLEM WITH NUMBERS BEING EQUAL TO EACH OTHER! The PHYSICS (aka PHYSICAL) problem DISAPPEARS in the NUMERICAL REALM. But the REAL issue is that there’s no thing that MATCHES an Absolute thing. A NUMBER IS NOT A PHYSICAL THING! An Absolute thing is PHYSICAL, and has NO EQUAL. How this relates to what we discussed in Article 1 about using Free Will to change one’s GOVERNOR MODULE NUMBER to Pi is that NUMBERS THAT IDENTIFY PHYSICAL THINGS THAT ARE NOT MUTUALLY-RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER CAN BE THE SAME, giving the physical things the same INFORMATION without changing their singular PHYSICAL POV.

Dr. Spencer Klavan: [speaking to Dr. Jordan Peterson in a video entitled “The Three Body Problem”] If you have three bodies mutually-attracting each other [gravitationally], it’s impossible to lay-out a logos…that is, a consistent system that can be reduced to abstract principles, comprehended by the human mind, and then used to fly to outer space [or] to navigate through whatever situation you find yourself in, and the reason [the author of “The Three Body Problem” book] starts with this is because…[we] might hit a point when the whole structure of reality [as science describes it]…just doesn’t compute inside of us because we no longer have this conviction that the imprint on our brains is effectively the hand of God.

The hand of (D)evil surely gave us THE UNSOLVABLE THREE BODY PROBLEM, not the hand of God. 

We know this for certain because WE NOTICE that we wouldn’t need to worry about THE THREE BODY PROBLEM at all if GRAVITY was not caused directly or indirectly by one mass being attracted-to another mass, *and* we are, in fact, going to see below that GRAVITY is a CONSTANT, ETERNAL FORCE, NOT caused directly or indirectly by one mass being attracted-to another mass. 

Then in the future—after we figure-how how mass is made—we will see that there is a simple reason why THE FORCE OF GRAVITY *seems* to decrease as a function of distance from the center of the earth, and that simple reason is because FORWARD-ACTING WAVE-ENERGY generated by the mass of the earth PUTS THE BRAKES ON OUR CENTER-OF-MASS (“COM”), so that the higher we get above the earth, the more mass of the earth is underneath us, and the more FORWARD-ACTING WAVE-ENERGY we are experiencing, until finally—when all the mass of the earth is underneath us—we are LEVITATING.  

Picture this: There’s no material thing holding you up, and THE “ENGINE” (physical force) OF GRAVITY IS REVVING INSIDE OF YOU TO CAUSE YOU TO FREE-FALL, BUT THE “BRAKING SYSTEM” OF THE EARTH IS ALSO DELIVERING ELECTROMAGNETIC POWER (wave-energy) TO YOU, SO NOW YOU ARE HOVERING—more or less, depending-on how much electromagnetic braking power (wave-energy) you are getting from the earth—INSTEAD OF FULL-SPEED FALLING.

And—in the absence of air resistance—that seems like the simplest and most obvious explanation for observations of free-falling things on earth, right? 

Yes, it’s intuitive, but only if you know THE DIRECTION OF ABSOLUTE (Absolute = ETERNAL, aka GOD), because that’s the only way to figure-out where you’re at and which way you’re heading.

Understanding THE DIRECTION OF ABSOLUTE is the only way to state a Big Bang theory, and having a Big Bang theory is the only way to state a theory of MATTER, and having a theory of MATTER is the only way to state a theory of MATTER’S MOVEMENT, and having theory of MATTER’S MOVEMENT is the only way to state a theory of ORBITING, and having a theory of ORBITING is the only way to state a theory of GRAVITY ON EARTH. 

So we’ve got volumes of material to cover before we rest our case of GRAVITY ON EARTH, but conveniently, we can rest assured that we’re going to get there because we know the DIRECTION we’re heading, unlike Einstein superfan and celebrity-physicist Neil de Grasse Tyson, who does not have any “nice days” as a consequence — he’s always having a “bad day”; a very, very bad day.

Also conveniently for us, what we’ve established so far in our Big Bang theory—we’ve established the facts that (a) matter cannot catch-up to the speed of light because (b) God’s provable existence assures us that MATTER IS RELATIVE-TO LIGHT BUT NOT VICE-VERSA, with matter being created from 4-d light particles that we’re calling Lumeynes—is actually another way we can verify the conclusions of Mini-step 5 *and* Mini-step 6 (the conclusions must be that every particle in the 3-part multi-dimensional entity called God must contain the same electromagnetic wave-energy, aka LIGHT, *and* matter must ALWAYS satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion by generating equal-and-opposite electromagnetic wave-energy, aka LIGHT), and that’s also the proof of mass-energy equivalence, AND NOT COINCIDENTALLY, IT ALSO GIVES US SOME OF THE INFORMATION WE WILL NEED TO EXPLAIN THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT after we figure-out how matter is made. 

Now let’s SELECT VOCABULARY for the wave-energy paid as 100% tax on moving-services (the equal-and-opposite wave-energy generated to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to being acted-on by external physical force), and let’s call that “OPP wave-energy.”

I propose using the nomenclature “Ef(OPPFg)” to refer-to the OPP wave-energy generated by a Lumeyne satisfying Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to Fg acting-on the Lumeyne, and “Ef(OPPFt)” to refer-to the OPP wave-energy generated by a Lumeyne satisfying Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to Ft acting-on the Lumeyne. 

As we saw in THE SECOND COROLLARY, above, Timeynes are not acted-upon by external physical forces, so they don’t generate OPP wave-energy, and as we will see below, Gravitynes do not experience external physical force, either, so they only ever emit Eg and never OPP wave-energy. 

QUESTION: Houston, do we have a problem? We have established that a particle is “one wave-energy” in magnitude—it is the smallest unit of mass, with “one unit” of mass—so therefore a particle only has one wave-energy to “spend” at any given time, and a Lumeyne is constantly spending its one wave-energy as Ef when it expresses its experience of Natural Eternal Fmass(L) as wave-particle duality, so then the question becomes: WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE OTHER TWO UNITS OF MASS, aka wave-energy—Ef(OPPFg) and Ef(OPPFt)—that that the Lumeyne is GENERATING to pay the 100% tax on the physical moving services Fg and Ft received from the Gravityne and the Timeyne, respectively?

ANSWER: The moving services Fg and Ft—the external applied physical forces—that the Lumeyne receives from the Gravityne and the Timeyne, respectively, are THE SOURCE of the wave-energy Ef(OPPFg) and Ef(OPPFt) that the Lumeyne is generating.

QUESTION: Wut??? What about the discussion in Article 4 (regarding the “conservation of momentum”) explaining how it’s non-sensical to say that one object can “give its energy away”—pass it around like a “hot potato”—by applying external physical force to another object? Particles surely can’t COMMIT SUICIDE or BE MURDERED by applying physical force to other particles; a force-struck particle surely can’t STEAL POWER from the force-source particle and leave it without Natural EXISTENCE! That’s indubitable, so the question becomes: HOW IS IT POSSIBLE for the external physical forces (the moving services) Fg and Ft applied to the Lumeyne by the Gravityne and the Timeyne, respectively, to be THE SOURCE of the two units of mass, aka wave-energy, Ef(OPPFg) and Ef(OPPFt), that the Lumeyne is GENERATING to pay the 100% tax on…wait for it…the applied physical forces (the moving services) Fg and Ft???

ANSWER: Houston, WE DO NOT HAVE A PROBLEM; there is NO CONTRADICTION, but there are *two different issues* that must be separated for discussion to understand the situation:

Issue (1), A particle cannot commit suicide or be murdered—a particle cannot be left without Natural existence—as a result of APPLYING PHYSICAL FORCE to another particle, and thereby “give its power away” to be “passed around” like a “hot potato” in an ”assembly line” or other “system” to “conserve momentum” (see Article 4);

and 

Issue (2), Different dimensions are MUTUALLY-EXCLUSIVE (this is a corollary of God’s Eternal existence as a 3-part multi-dimensional entity, see Article 1), and we know that a dimension is comprised-of PARTICLES, because by observation of matter we see that massive objects are comprised of smaller objects, and we also know (again see Article 1) that matter was created from a part of God, ergo, the part of God that became matter must be comprised-of small objects, which means that if two particles are in DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS, then the lower-dimension particle is DEPENDENT-ON (RELATIVE-TO) to the higher-dimension particle, but not vice-versa, and from the lower-dimension particle’s POV the higher-dimension particle DOES NOT EXIST, so then in that situation, when the higher-dimension particle applies physical force (provides a moving service) to the lower-dimension particle, THERE IS ENERGY WITH THE MAGNITUDE OF “ONE PARTICLE MASS” BEING *ADDED-INTO* THE LOWER-DIMENSION PARTICLE that DOES NOT EXIST NATURALLY in the lower dimension—it’s AS IF the lower-dimension particle GAINED MASS “out of nowhere” when the higher-dimension particle applied physical force to the lower-dimension particle—hence, the lower-dimension particle’s concurrent generation of the equal-and-opposite wave-energy tax payment to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion, with THE SOURCE of the wave-energy being the external physical force (the moving service) applied to the lower-dimension particle by the higher-dimension particle. And don’t forget that the higher-dimension particle is receiving an internal “refill” of mass at the same time as it is applying physical force (the moving service) to the lower-dimension particle. 

QUESTION: Why aren’t applied EXTERNAL WAVE-ENERGY forces taxable receivables in “God’s country”? 

ANSWER: Two reasons: (1) we know that every Eternal particle is constantly being DIY-moved via the force of Fmass at the expense of the particle’s own WAVE-ENERGY, and that’s like a tax paid for EXISTING (“idling”); and (2) we proved by deduction (see the SIX mini-steps, above) that WAVE-ENERGY is the equal-and-opposite force that is generated whenever it is necessary to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to being acted-on by external physical force. So we see that any wave-energy received from any external source will be coming-from an “account” that the external source already paid tax on, and therefore all wave-energy received from an external source is like an ALL-TAXES-PAID FREE GIFT (a “TAX-FREE GIFT”) to the recipient.

QUESTION: What about wave-energy received from the source of the wave-energy? In other words, is there a way for a particle re-capture its own wave-energy AS IT IS GENERATED? 

ANSWER: NO WAY! You can’t pay tax and then WITHIN THE SAME “TRANSACTION,” TAKE THE TAX PAYMENT BACK with *vocabulary* by calling it “an all-taxed-paid free gift” TO YOURSELF!

So when a particle generates wave-energy (pays tax), then it’s a “tax-free gift” TO ANOTHER PARTICLE at that time, but it’s impossible for the particle itself to receive its own wave-energy as its generated, and that’s actually because the particle itself doesn’t even “notice” its own wave-energy as being “separate from itself,” which is in turn because there is ZERO DISTANCE BETWEEN A PARTICLE AND ITSELF.

Now we are ready to put all of the information we’ve collected so far together to complete THINK #1!  

Here we envision one Snowman of God comprised-of three particles that are like tax-paying turtles, with the Timeyne particle-force, Ft, being capable of acting-in BOTH the Absolute Forward direction AND the Absolute Backward direction along its own ADL (which informs us that the Lumeyne particle-force, Ff, must also be capable of acting-in BOTH the Absolute Forward direction AND the Absolute Backward direction along its own ADL):

End of THINK #1!

Welcome to THINK #2! 

THE SECOND THINK WE HAVE TO DO is apply the TPTPTP we enabled in THINK #1 to logically-support A VISION of THE SLEEPING GIANT, which means A VISION of one Snowman of God comprised-of three particles that are like tax-paying turtles IN THE UPSIDE-DOWN “ASLEEP” STATE, explaining STEP-BY-STEP the forceful causes that kept God “in bed.” 

SO BRACE YOURSELF to TAKE A SERIES OF STEPS into the underworld where movement begins!

We are diving into the details of action (particle-force application) and reaction (equal-and-opposite wave-energy generation), which is the topic of how Newton’s Third Law of Motion works. 

STEP 1. RECALL THE VISION that we logically-supported in THINK #1 of one Snowman of God comprised-of three particles that are like tax-paying turtles:  

STEP 2. QUESTION: How would it be physically possible for the Timeyne in the 6th dimension to apply Ft to the Lumeyne in the 4th dimension if the Gravityne in the 5th dimension is positioned in-between the Timeyne and the Lumeyne along the same multi-dimensional ADL?

STEP 3. ANSWER: Two features would make this possible:

(i) Fmass(L), Fmass(G) and Fmass(T) being expressed as rotational force around a particle’s own ADL; and

(ii) a stretchable, spinnable, integral, physically-forceful, wave-energy-receiving-and-transmitting organ (let’s call it a “Tongue,” and more specifically, it’s a “COM Tongue”) between dimensions, and in particular between the Timeyne (the 6th dimension) and the Lumeyne (the 4th dimension) and also between the Gravityne (the 5th dimension) and Lumyeyne (the 4th dimension), for the dual purposes of:

(a) driving Ft from the Timeyne to the Lumeyne and driving Fg from the Gravityne to the Lumeyne by causing the bottom of the Lumeyne to rotate or attempt to rotate in accordance with the directional force applied by the applicable COM Tongue, as the COM Tongue functions like a taut string that spins at the same rate and in the same direction as the driver-particle, and thereby winds-around the bottom of the Lumeyne particle (here envision the well-known phenomenon of a gyroscope being spun-up with a string, as shown at Time 1:00 in the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cquvA_IpEsA), and

(b) receiving and transmitting (but not storing or tax-paying) wave-energy.

When I say that the Tongue is “stretchable,” I mean super-stretchable like “Elastigirl” or “The Mask,” which might sound strange, but don’t forget that we’ve got to explain how a Lumeyne could go flying at the Big Bang yet still remain physically-connected and forcefully-responsive to a Timeyne and a Gravityne in the same Snowman of God. 

STEP 4A. You have to ask yourself one QUESTION: Do I feel lucky? 

STEP 4B. JK, the $64,000 QUESTION is: HOW IS THAT EVEN PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE? 

STEP 4C. ONE POSSIBLE ANSWER: If it’s possible to cut a hole large enough for a grown man to walk-through in an 8.5-inch-by-11-inch piece of paper, then it’s possible.

See physicist Neil deGrasse Tyson demonstrating the hole-cutting technique in a video, remarking that it would in theory be possible to cut a hole big enough to go around the moon and back, and in fact in theory there would be NO PRACTICAL LIMIT to the hole-size!

So maybe that’s all we need to know: There is no Zeno’s Paradox there (no infinite divisibility problem to solve) because there is always a finite distance between the Timeyne, Gravityne and Lumeyne particles within one Snowman of God.

STEP 4D. ANOTHER POSSIBLE ANSWER: We could re-phrase the QUESTION to look-at physical Reality another way: What is the distance between the 6-d Tongue attached to the Timeyne and the 6-d COM Tongue attached to the Lumeyne (in other words, what is the distance between the 6-d COM Tongue and the 6-d COM Tongue)?

And likewise, what is the distance between the 5-d COM Tongue attached to the Gravityne and the 5-d COM Tongue attached to the Lumeyne (in other words, what is the distance between the 5-d COM Tongue and the 5-d COM Tongue)?

STEP 4E. ANSWER: Zero.

The COM Tongue isn’t a separate thing from the particle that drives it, and a thing cannot be relative-to itself, even if there are various and variable coordinates of the thing that are all relative-to the Backward-most coordinate of the thing.

To phrase it yet another way, having thing-ness at different coordinates doesn’t negate the thing-ness as-a-whole.

ERGO, we could fairly conclude that it’s unnecessary to account-for “intra-thing distances”!

And this doesn’t contradict the conclusion that there is a distance between a Timeyne and a Lumeyne or a Gravityne and a Lumeyne, because Lumeyne particles are RELATIVE-TO the force-applying particles from the higher dimensions!

But again, when a COM Tongue is wound-around the bottom of a Lumeyne, then THERE ISN’T ANY DISTANCE “BETWEEN” the COM TONGUE AND THE LUMEYNE, nor is there any distance between the COM Tongue and its own integral driver-particle.

So what we are learning is that THERE IS NO DISTANCE BETWEEN DIMENSIONS THAT ARE CONNECTED BY COM TONGUES. 

And what we’ve just shown is that WE DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY about how long it takes for a force—either a physical force or wave-energy—to travel *between dimensions* via a *physical connection* (it takes ZERO TIME, because there is ZERO DISTANCE to “travel”),

but after we figure-out how matter is made, WE WILL HAVE TO WORRY about how long it takes for wave-energy to travel between 3-d objects-of-matter, because there is *no physical connection* between the 3-d objects, which are RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER.

QUESTION: But do we have to worry about how long it takes for wave-energy to travel *between dimensions* if a COM Tongue is NOT the means of travel, but rather, the wave-energy is merely being emitted by a higher-dimension particle along the ADL in the direction of the lower-dimension particle that is DIRECTLY ON TOP (FORWARD) of the higher-dimension particle in the Snowman of God? 

ANSWER: No, because the ADLs in each dimension are ABSOLUTELY COINCIDENT, and a lower-dimension is RELATIVE-TO a higher-dimension, so therefore it is as if a higher-dimension particle is always “reaching into” the lower-dimension DIRECTLY ON TOP (FORWARD) of it via the ADL, and wave-energy emitted by a higher-dimension particle along the ADL in the direction of a lower-dimension particle is being “deposited on the origin (the COM)”  of the lower-dimension particle.

And to repeat: The reason why the COM Tongues of the Gravityne and the Timeyne are able to directly consume the wave-energy emitted by the lower-dimension Lumeyne is because the higher-dimension COM Tongues are physically wrapped-around the Lumeyne’s particle bottom, literally “reaching into” the 4th dimension.

WOW! That’s amazing:

To be able to use reason (what we presume is an abstract logical construct) to prove that a dimension is a physical thing, not an abstract logical construct! 

Now I am reminded-of a speech Jim Carrey gave c. 2010 about “how thought is an illusory thing [that causes suffering],” and what I’m suddenly realizing—which is relieving my suffering—is that thought is the Real Real, it is the CORE FUNCTION (the function of the core) of the highest dimension in Reality (which is a physical thing), and the only way that we can know that is by the act of thinking about how we were made from the multi-dimensional entity called God.

“Suddenly I was thrown into this expansive, amazing feeling of freedom: From myself, from my problems; I saw that I was bigger than what I do, I was bigger than my body, I was everything and everyone, I was no longer a fragment of the universe, I was the universe, and ever since that day, I’ve been trying to get back there….” —Jim Carrey

STEP 5. Before we further flesh-out the description of the COM Tongue (see STEP 3), we have to ask another QUESTION: 

Do we have any REASON TO ASSUME that particles experience the force of Fmass as ROTATIONAL FORCE in a certain direction around their own ADLs (see STEP 3(i))?

ANSWER: YES, I submit that we are COMPELLED TO ASSUME that particles constantly experience Fmass as rotation around their ADLs!  

Check out the reasoning: 

We know that every particle must constantly express its own “force of mass” (Fmass) as wave-particle duality simply to exist, because SOMETHING cannot DO NOTHING or else it doesn’t exist, which means that there’s no such thing as ”mass-less energy” or ”energy-less mass,” that’s a contradiction in terms that violates the Law of Conservation of Energy (hence, the mass-energy equivalence tenet, which the Piezeoelectric Effect verifies experimentally; see the SIX Mini-steps.)

So we deduce that the smallest unit of mass MUST BE “one wave-energy,” and that’s a corollary of the Conservation of Energy and mass-energy equivalence, because again: There’s no such thing as mass-less energy or energy-less mass, so YOU CAN’T GET ANY SMALLER THAN *ONE UNIT* OF MASS/ENERGY, which we have shown (see the SIX mini-steps) must mean “one electromagnetic wave-energy,” aka one “light wave” generated by a Lumeyne having an equal-and-opposite reaction to being acted-on by a Gravityne or a Timeyne.

And we must conclude that a particle has minimum mass (because there’s no such thing as “extra mass” that exists but isn’t doing anything, so a particle’s Fmass must represent “everything a particle’s got,” and what a particle’s got is only going to be whatever a massive object NEEDS to exist, and a massive object doesn’t NEED more than one wave-energy to exist), and that means that a particle must have the mass of “one wave-energy.” 

If we concluded otherwise, then we’d have a RELATIVITY problem, because wave-energy is what a particle’s MASS is made-of, and so when you get to the particle level, you’ve got to have a one-to-one ratio between waves and particles or else the “which one is GREATER?” problem arises, but we already know that the answer is that ONE THING (a part of God, meaning a dimension of God, comprising particles that are like turtles with wave-particle duality) CANNOT BE GREATER THAN ITSELF.

We NOTICE that when a particle expresses its wave-particle duality, the wave-energy—which we now know is the entire mass of the particle—travels at the speed of light.

And it’s a Truism that a particle can’t go faster than the “energy of mass” (Fmass) of itself, so therefore the particle’s constant expression of its wave-particle duality in opposite directions must leave it “idling,” not moving linearly. 

But that’s not all! 

A particle’s own inherent, Eternal force can *only* cause the particle to spin in place because a particle can’t *TAKE ITSELF* TO ANOTHER PLACE by ACTING-ON ITSELF! That’s just common sense.  

In other words, we have figured-out that a particle can’t go anywhere unless there is an EXTERNAL particle-force acting-on it.

BUT THEN THE QUESTION BECOMES:

HOW DOES AN EXTERNAL PARTICLE (the particle-force of a Gravityne or a Timeyne) ACT-ON A LUMEYNE IF THE EXTERNAL PARTICLE IS ONLY CAPABLE OF *IDLING* (and NOTE that we must avoid triggering the “infinite regress” problem of saying that an external particle is acted-upon by *another external force* that puts it into motion, which means that we must assume that the external particle is applying its IDLING particle-force to a Lumeyne)?

ANSWER: That would only be possible if the “idling” particle-force (Fmass) is expressed as a ROTATIONAL FORCE, because in that case the rotational force could be applied externally via an integral spinning dimension-connecting “string” (see the Tongue described in STEP 3) attached to both particles, which would ENABLE a Lumeyne to be “SPUN-UP” with “idling” force from an external particle expressing its Natural wave-particle duality, and that would be like TAKING THE LUMEYNE OUT OF “NEUTRAL” AND “PUTTING THE LUMEYNE INTO GEAR.” 

Also think about it this way: A particle cannot rotate faster than the speed of light, and every particle is inherently “idling” at the speed of light, so therefore when external rotational particle-force is applied in the same rotational direction in which a Lumeyne is idling, then the only option the Lumeyene has is to MOVE LINEARLY AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT. 

STEP 6. QUESTION: We RECALL (see STEP 5) that the EXISTENCE of every particle depends-upon the particle constantly hauling mass, which means expressing the force of mass, aka Fmass, as wave-particle duality (that’s like paying 100% tax for existing), and now we are seeing that this means that every particle must have an inherent and fixed rotation direction around the ADL that can never change, so how can we determine the Natural direction of rotation of a Lumeyne, a Gravityne and a Timeyne around the ADL (see STEP 3(i) and STEP 5)?

STEP 7.  ANSWER: Is it partly sunny or partly cloudy? What I mean is that the answer depends-on whether you’re looking-at the top of the particle or the bottom of the particle, and then once you pick the POV convention, THERE IS A DEFINITE ANSWER regarding which rotation direction causes the expression of Forward-acting particle-force along the ADL and which rotation direction causes the expression of Backward-acting particle-force along the ADL. 

We know that a Lumeyne and a Timeyne must Naturally have a Forward-acting particle-force and a Gravityne must Naturally have a Backward-acting particle-force.

Here’s how we know that: A Gravityne in the Good part of God and a Lumeyne in the Evil part of God must express particle-force in opposite directions, and since a Gravityne (“the one good thing”) must remain in the same orientation forever, we deduce that a Gravityne must Naturally have a Backward-acting particle-force, and therefore a Lumeyne (and a Timeyne, which controls a Lumeyne) must Naturally have a Forward-acting particle force. 

ASIDE ABOUT THE ORIENTATION OF SATAN’S SOUL PARTICLE

As discussed in Article 1, the LUMEYNE PARTICLE associated with the conscious SELF of the Evil part of God (let’s call that SATAN’S SOUL PARTICLE) is NATURALLY heading at 90-degrees relative-to the LUMEYNE PARTICLE associated with the conscious SELF of the Good part of God (let’s call that the GOOD SOUL PARTICLE), which means that Satan’s Soul Particle is lying on its side, heading along the EQUATOR LINE of the particle.

We know this because the GOOD SOUL PARTICLE must be NATURALLY heading in the same direction as the Gravityne in the 5th dimension, and that’s the Absolute Backward direction along the ADL (i.e., along the MERIDIAN LINE of the particle.)

So that fact raises a QUESTION: 

Is there A CONTRADICTION between what we said in Article 1 about the orientation of Satan’s Soul Particle lying on its side, heading along the EQUATOR LINE of the particle, and what we are saying here in Article 6 about LUMEYNES NATURALLY EXPRESSING FORWARD-ACTING PARTICLE-FORCE ALONG THEIR OWN ADL?

ANSWER: No, there is NO CONTRADICTION, for four reasons:

Reason (1), the “tilting” of a particle (e.g., Satan’s Soul Particle lying on its side) is separate from the particle’s Natural expression of particle-force, which is what determines the Eternal rotation direction of the particle, and in fact, the relevant information is that a particle’s rotation direction remains the same *regardless* of the particle’s TILTING, *and regardless* of whether the particle is tipped UPSIDE-DOWN or UPSIDE-UP; 

and

Reason (2), we NOTICE that SOUL PARTICLES would have the same *CONSCIOUS EXPERIENCE* whether the SOUL PARTICLES were tipped UPSIDE-DOWN or tipped UPSIDE-UP, because THE UPPER AND LOWER HALVES OF A SPHERE ARE IDENTICAL, and we ALSO NOTICE that a particle lying on its side, heading along the EQUATOR LINE of the particle, could be *either* tipped UPSIDE-DOWN *or* tipped UPSIDE-UP; 

and

Reason (3), dimensions, by definition, are mutually-exclusive, which means that there are *no actual 3-d lines* in the higher dimensions, i.e., in the 4th dimension, the 5th dimension, and the 6th dimension;

and 

Reason (4), none of the Eternal particles in the same dimension (the Lumeynes in the 4th dimension, the Gravitynes in the 5th dimension, and the Timeynes in the 6th dimension) are RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER.

Putting those four reasons together, we see that WITHIN A SNOWMAN OF GOD, REGARDLESS OF THE TILTING that a given particle may be experiencing—e.g., Satan’s Soul Particle is Naturally lying on its side, oriented at 90-degrees relative-to the ADL—unless a particle is attached via a COM Tongue to a lower-dimension particle in the same Snowman of God (and pre-Big-Bang, the 3rd dimension is empty, so Satan’s Soul Particle is not attached via a COM Tongue to any thing in the 3rd dimension)—a particle is CONSTRAINED to have EFFECTS along its own ADL, and even more specifically, IT’S IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY ETERNAL PARTICLE TO HAVE ANY EFFECTS ON ITS (NOT RELATIVE!) NEIGHBORS.

So FOR PRE-BIG-BANG AND BIG BANG ANALYSIS PURPOSES, the only particle-orientation variable we need to account-for is WHETHER THE TIMEYNE AND THE LUMEYNE IN A GIVEN SNOWMAN OF GOD ARE TIPPED UPSIDE-DOWN OR TIPPED UPSIDE-UP.

But again, when we’re talking about a particle’s Natural expression of particle-force in the Forward or Backward direction, we’re NOT concerned with the “tilting” or “tipping-over” of the particle, WE’RE TALKING ABOUT THE PARTICLE’S ETERNAL ROTATION DIRECTION, which remains the same FOREVER, regardless of the particle’s “tilting” or “tipping-over.” 

END OF ASIDE ABOUT THE ORIENTATION OF SATAN’S SOUL PARTICLE

Now let’s return to the discussion of a particle’s Natural ETERNAL ROTATION DIRECTION. 

What I’m going to do is use a DIY “right-hand rule” as my guide, and what I mean by that is that I’m going to look-at an imaginary vertical line—an imaginary ADL with an “up” (Absolute Forward, aka GRAVITY-OPPOSING) direction and a “down” (Absolute Backward, aka GRAVITY) direction—in front of my face, and I’m going to think-about grabbing that line with my right hand and wrapping my fingers around it in a manner that causes my thumb to be pointing “up,” which I know is roughly in the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION, aka the Absolute Forward direction, on the ADL, as I’m sitting here on a mattress on the floor.

QUESTION: But how do I know that my POV on the earth when I’m grabbing the imaginary ADL with my right hand is the same as the POV of a Snowman of God? 

ANSWER: IDK, but I do know that if I’m wrong then I’m 180 degrees wrong, and I could ALWAYS fix the problem by moving to the Southern Hemisphere. 

OK so I’m sitting here in the Northern Hemisphere on a mattress on the floor and I’m grabbing an imaginary vertical ADL in front of my face with my right hand and with my thumb pointing “up,” and what I see when I do that activity is that my fingers are moving around the line in a CCW direction from the POV of the thumb-side of my hand (the part of my hand pointing “up”), 

but then if I look at the direction in which my fingers are moving around the line from the POV of the pinky-side of my hand (the part of my hand pointing “down”), I see my fingers moving in a CW direction around the line,

so I could EITHER SAY that WHEN MY THUMB IS POINTING *FORWARD* ALONG THE ADL according to the “DIY right-hand rule” I’ve defined, then the Natural rotation direction of my fingers is CCW from the POV of the top of my hand, OR I could say that the Natural rotation direction of my fingers is CW from the POV of the bottom of my hand.

And I’m going choose the latter POV to define particle rotation direction, i.e., I’m going to look at a particle bottom to determine its rotation direction because that’s what the Tongue (see STEP 3) has to do, which means that CW rotation from the POV of the particle bottom causes particle-force to be expressed in the Forward direction along the ADL. 

So the conclusion would be that a Lumeyne’s Natural particle-force, Ff (which tries to cause motion in the Forward direction along the ADL), is expressed by clockwise (“CW”) rotation around the ADL from the POV of the bottom of the Lumeyne,

and

a Gravityne’s Natural particle-force, Fg (which tries to cause motion in the Backward direction along the ADL), is expressed by counter-clockwise (“CCW”) rotation around the ADL from the POV of the bottom of the Gravityne, 

and

a Timeyne’s Natural particle-force, Ft (which Naturally tries to cause motion in the Forward direction along the ADL), is expressed by CW rotation around the ADL from the POV of the bottom of the Timeyne.

But to repeat: I didn’t just “select” the direction of particle-force as a matter of CONVENTION! 

I FIRST determined the direction of particle-force, which is what determines ETERNAL ROTATION DIRECTION, and THEN I selected the POV of looking-at a particle to “define” rotation direction, and then of course I also defined the directions of the ADL from the POV of someone in the Northern Hemisphere. 

And I’ve already acknowledged that it *could be* that my POV selections are “un-conventional,” which would NOT BE A PROBLEM WITH THE THEORY (here I’m reminded of my college math professor who used to get very annoyed when students would “correct” him for writing a positive number instead of a negative number as the answer to a problem, so he would just change the positive to the negative or vice-versa WITHOUT COMMENT, like “OK FINE, YOU’RE STANDING ON YOUR HANDS INSTEAD OF YOUR FEET, BUT THAT DOESN’T CHANGE THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE, AND I JUST PROVED IT, BUT INSTEAD OF APPLAUSE WHAT I GET IS CRITICIZED FOR HAVING A SOUTH-POLE WORLD-VIEW INSTEAD OF A NORTH-POLE WORLD-VIEW OR VICE-VERSA!”) 

QUESTION: But the earth must be made from Lumeynes (although we don’t know how that happened yet), and when we look-at the earth’s rotation around its axis, we see that the earth is rotating CCW from the POV of the top of the earth (the North Pole), and CW from the POV of the bottom of the earth (the South Pole), SO IF WE ACCIDENTALLY SELECT AN “UNCONVENTIONAL” POV NOW TO DEFINE THE DIRECTION OF LUMEYNE ROTATION, ARE WE IN DANGER OF CONTRADICTING OBSERVATIONS OF MASSIVE OBJECTS LATER?  

ANSWER: NO, we’re discussing Eternal particles now, not matter; we see by observation that a massive object doesn’t have a Natural direction of rotation; it can be spun-up in either direction (CW or CCW) around an axis of rotation, and even the axis of rotation can sometimes be chosen!  

The two issues we are discussing are: (1) a Lumeyne and a Timeyne have Naturally Forward-acting particle-force, and a Gravityne has Naturally Backward-acting particle-force; and (2) the Natural particle-force direction is what determines the particle’s  ETERNAL ROTATION DIRECTION.

And we have already deduced this information, BUT WE COULD CONFIRM OUR CONCLUSIONS USING A DIFFERENT WAY OF THINKING.

For example, we could THINK ABOUT THE CONDITIONS NECESSARY TO CAUSE FORWARD MOVEMENT OF A LUMEYNE AT THE BIG BANG.

We know that a Lumeyne has to overcome the Backward-acting force of a Gravityne (gravity), Fg, to move Forward. 

And we also know that the Backward-acting force of gravity, Fg, must BALANCE, i.e., be of equal magnitude as, the Lumeyne’s particle-force, Ff, otherwise PARTICLE MASS could not remain constant as Fg acted-on a Lumeyne and the Lumeyne generated equal-and-opposite wave-energy to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion. 

It violates the Law of Conservation of Energy to have either constantly-declining or constantly-increasing mass, because it’s impossible for a physical container to be infinitely small or infinitely large!

So now we clearly see the problem with the Lumeyne having Naturally Backward-acting particle-force, and the problem is that if the Lumeyne’s particle-force, Ff, was Backward-acting, then the Timeyne’s particle-force, Ft, would have to be TWO TIMES THE MAGNITUDE of Ff to cause the Lumeyne to overcome the force of gravity and move Forward.

But of course if the Timeyne’s particle-force had a different *magnitude* than either Ff or Fg, then PARTICLE MASS could not remain constant as Ft acted-on a Lumeyne and the Lumeyne generated equal-and-opposite wave-energy to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion.

And that non-constant MASS situation would violate the Law of Conservation of energy.

Ergo, a Lumeyne’s Natural particle-force, Ff, must be in the Forward direction.

This means that a Timeyne’s Natural particle-force, Ft, must also be in the Forward direction.

BUT there’s “a twist” regarding a Timeyne’s pre-Big-Bang ORIENTATION along its own ADL: The Timeyne’s pre-Big-Bang ORIENTATION must be UPSIDE-DOWN, so that when a Timeyne’s Ft is APPLIED AS EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE to a Lumeyne in the same Snowman of God, Ft is experienced by the Lumeyne as a Backward-acting physical force that tries to get the Lumeyne to move in the Backward direction along the Lumeyne’s ADL, otherwise, the Lumeyne would MOVE FORWARD instead of remaining still. 

So that’s a “tip-off” that (as we will show) a Timeyne must be capable of TIPPING-OVER like a Tippe Top to “get out of bed,” i.e., to cause Lumeyne movement at the Big Bang, by applying Ft to a Lumeyne in a manner that is experienced by the Lumeyne as Forward-acting physical force that tires to get the Lumeyne to move in the Forward direction along the Lumeyne’s ADL.

And AGAIN, this is why we must conclude that a Timeyne’s (and a Lumeyne’s) pre-Big-Bang ORIENTATION along the Timeyne’s ADL is UPSIDE-DOWN.

So we could think-of Father Time becoming Santa Claus in the UPSIDE-DOWN state, with his TAX-FREE GIFTS OF WAVE-ENERGY and his particle-force changing directions along the ADL.

STEP 8. QUESTION: Does the Timeyne apply Ft to the Gravityne?

STEP 9. ANSWER: NO, for two reasons.

First, from a LEGAL standpoint, the Justice part of God cannot “control” the Good part of God, because that destroys the impartiality of THE STANDARD OF JUDGMENT that the Justice part of God must “consult” to DO JUSTICE. 

Second, from a PHYSICAL standpoint, I would have to say that one Tongue can only be connected-to the bottom of ONE EXTERNAL PARTICLE because A COM TONGUE CAN ONLY APPLY ROTATIONAL FORCE IN ONE DIRECTION at a time, with the LOGICAL PROBLEM being that if ONE COM TONGUE were to be attached-to TWO EXTERNAL PARTICLES in different dimensions, then that would either require (a) SERIAL CONNECTIONS, which would make it impossible to transfer physical force to both external particles simultaneously (and I cannot conceive-of any physical “switching means” in such a configuration because that would require more parts than are available in one dimension, where no mutual-relativity can exist), or (b) TWO “ENDS” OF THE COM TONGUE to make PARALLEL CONNECTIONS, but then the problem becomes that TWO “ENDS” OF THE SAME COM TONGUE would necessarily be rotating in OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS, so that situation would be the physical equivalent of “circular logic,” meaning that it would violate the Laws of Physics in practice, by causing the rotational force to “collapse,” and we see this in the field of GEARS, where ONE DRIVER GEAR can only apply force in ONE DIRECTION, and trying to get ONE DRIVER GEAR to simultaneously apply force in OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS at the same time will cause the driver gear to STOP WORKING.

STEP 10. Let’s pause here to LOOK AT THE MAP—take a peek at THE VISION of THE SLEEPING GIANT that we are well on the way to logically-supporting—so that we can *see where we’re going* as we continue to piece-together, step-by-step, the way to “get God into bed”:

Don’t worry about THE VISION being blurry at this point, it will come into focus as we progress, and also don’t worry about “alternative routes” that are not depicted, because you are 100 welcome to assure yourself that all alternative routes are DEAD-ENDS, as I had to assure myself as I went-down every other route except-for this one before finally finding Jesus “asleep at the wheel,” which is what I was looking-for, so I knew I could stop worrying about being wrong IN PRINCIPLE, and start making-sure that THE DETAILS were in order, which is a constant-improvement project.

QUESTION: WHY is the Gravityne’s 5- COM Tongue emanating from the “particle bottom” of the Gravityne while the UPSIDE-DOWN Timeyne’s 6-d COM Tongue is emanating from the “particle/COM attachment position” of the Timeyne? 

ANSWER: That’s the difference between Natural Backward-acting particle-force and Natural Forward-acting particle-force.

THERE MUST BE PHYSICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A GRAVITYNE AND A TIMEYNE (in other words, an UPSIDE-DOWN Timeyne is not the “same animal” as a Gravityne.)

Yet we see that the only physical difference that is possible is the Natural rotation direction, 

which means that it’s NECESSARY for the Gravityne’s COM Tongue to emanate from the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE PARTICLE as the Timeyne’s COM Tongue, 

because don’t forget that the top of a particle is always rotating in the opposite direction as the bottom of the particle from the POV of the top or bottom of the particle, which means that MERELY *selecting a POV* (the “particle bottom”) from which to DEFINE ROTATION DIRECTION is NOT SUFFICIENT to differentiate particles based-on their Natural rotation direction (which tries to cause motion along the particle’s ADL in EITHER the Forward or Backward Direction, and we know that the Gravityne is the only particle with a Natural Backward-acting particle-force.) 

Ergo, to differentiate particles based-on their Natural rotation direction, there must also be a difference in which “end” of the particle applies the physical force of rotation, aka the particle-force, 

and that’s why I’ve depicted the Gravityne’s particle-force being applied via the “particle bottom,” while the Timeyne’s particle-force is being applied via the “particle/COM attachment position.”

We know that the Lumeyne is going to be structured the same as the Timeyne because the Lumeyne and the Timeyne have the same Natural rotation direction.

STEP 11A. We’re continuing to reference THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram in STEP 10, and we’re focusing-on the LUMEYNE, which is shown separately in the following diagram:

STEP 11B. LIST OF PHYSICAL FORCES

We see that the Lumeyne is experiencing THREE PHYSICAL FORCES:

(i) the Lumeyne is “hauling mass,” which means experiencing INTERNAL Fmass(L) as the Lumeyne’s inherent wave-particle duality, which tries to get the Lumeyne to move (and apply its particle-force, Ff) in the 4-d Forward DIRECTION, aka the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION, along the Lumeyne’s ADL;

and

(ii) the Lumeyne is experiencing A FIRST EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE as the Gravityne is APPLYING Backward-acting particle-force, Fg, to the Lumeyne via the 5-d COM Tongue, which means that Fg is ACTING-ON the Lumeyne by trying to get the Lumeyne to move in the Backward direction on the Lumeyne’s ADL;

and

(iii) the Lumeyne is experiencing A SECOND EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE as the Timeyne is APPLYING Backward-acting particle-force, Ft, to the Lumeyne via the 6-d COM Tongue, which means that Ft is ACTING-ON the Lumeyne by trying to get the Lumeyne to move in the Backward direction on the Lumeyne’s ADL.

NOTE that the Gravityne and the Timeyne are not experiencing EXTERNAL physical force, they are only experiencing INTERNAL Fmass, i.e., “idling” wave-particle duality, so we see that the Lumeyne is the only particle that’s “in gear” and theoretically CAPABLE of linear movement; the Gravityne and the Timeyne are INCAPABLE of linear movement (see STEP 5.)

STEP 11C. DISCUSSION OF PHYSICAL FORCES 

Fmass(L) is being expressed as CW rotational velocity around the ADL from the POV of the “particle bottom.” 

Let’s refer-to rotational velocity as “v,” but parenthetically indicate its direction from the POV of the particle bottom, so it would look like: v(CW) or v(CCW), with an optional object-indicator.

So in terms of values, we could say: Fmass(L) = v(L,CW)

But we NOTICE that the Lumeyne is oriented in the Backward DIRECTION (aka the GRAVITY DIRECTION) along its ADL, 

and we RECALL (see STEP 7) that before the Big Bang, the Timeyne’s ORIENTATION along the Timeyne’s ADL is UPSIDE-DOWN, which informs-us that the Lumeyne’s ORIENTATION along the Lumeyne’s ADL is UPSIDE-DOWN, too, but for purposes of this discussion we’re going-to PRETEND that the Lumeyne wasn’t UPSIDE-DOWN before, so that we can discuss THE DIFFERENCE between the Lumeyne being UPSIDE-DOWN and UPSIDE-UP.  

The difference is that the UPSIDE-DOWN Lumeyne has experienced EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE that exceeded the magnitude of Fmass(L), and the EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE caused the Lumeyne to TIP UPSIDE-DOWN so that it could continue rotating in the CW direction around its ADL from the POV of the particle bottom.

So that tells us that the EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE that the Lumeyne experienced was Backward-acting, i.e., it was trying to get the Lumeyne to move in the Backward direction along the Lumeyne’s ADL, which means rotate in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION (CCW) from the Lumeyne’s Natural rotation direction, 

which the Lumeyne *could not do*, of course (the Lumeyne can only rotate CW), but the Lumeyne *could* TIP-OVER and *apply its physical force in the Backward direction* along the ADL, so that’s exactly what we see the Lumeyne doing, to wit:

The Lumeyne is applying the magnitude of the NET FORCE that it is experiencing in the same direction—the Backward direction—of the NET FORCE that it is experiencing!

But before we unpack that conclusion to get more specific about the magnitude of the NET FORCE that the Lumeyne is experiencing, let’s create some NEW VOCABULARY to differentiate between the magnitude and direction of a Lumeyne’s Natural particle-force, Ff (which is an expression of Fmass(L) as CW rotational force around the ADL), and the magnitude and direction of the NET FORCE that a Lumeyne is experiencing “in gear,” which is what we might call “Set Force,” so let’s call it “FfSet.”   

FfSet effectively REPLACES Ff, so we could think-of FfSet as A VARIABLE, which has a value that *takes into account* Ff. 

Now we can examine FfSet in more detail. 

The first thing we NOTICE on the diagram of the Lumeyne is that the Lumeyne is applying FfSet *against its own 4-d COM*, which we know isn’t going to *respond* to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion, because the Lumeyne and the 4-d COM are ONE THING, meaning that they are ONE PART OF GOD, aka A SINGLE DIMENSION, and a thing cannot be relative-to itself so it cannot “respond” to itself. 

So therefore the Lumeyne can bump and grind against the 4-d COM while it’s “in Backward gear,” but it’s not going to receive any equal-and-opposite reaction from the 4-d COM, nor is the Lumeyne going to get anywhere while its in THE UPSIDE-DOWN state within the Snowman of God.

And that’s fine! 

The next thing we must do is determine the magnitude of FfSet (which, again, is the NET FORCE in the Backward direction that the Lumeyne is experiencing.) 

We know that Ff = ♉️(L,CW), 

where ♉️ = UPSIDE-DOWN velocity.

We can’t forget that the Lumeyne’s Natural rotational velocity v(L,CW) had to be OVERCOME by Backward-acting force that was greater than Fmass(L) before the Lumeyne could tip UPSIDE-DOWN, which means that the Lumeyne’s UPSIDE-DOWN CW rotational velocity *would be* CCW rotational velocity if the Lumeyne had remained UPSIDE-UP, but of course a particle’s ETERNAL ROTATION DIRECTION CANNOT CHANGE, so the particle simply FLIPS OVER when the SET FORCE on the particle calls for rotation in the opposite direction.

To figure-out the magnitude of FfSet, we have to “find the balance” of the PHYSICAL FORCES that the Lumeyne is experiencing; physical forces perfectly balance one another when they have the same magnitude but act-in the opposite direction on the same object (which means try to get the object to move in opposite directions.)

So if we assign a “negative” value to a Backward-acting force in proportion to the magnitude of the Backward-acting force, and if we assign a “positive” value to a Forward-acting force in proportion to the magnitude of the Forward-acting force, then we can simply ADD PHYSICAL FORCES TOGETHER to figure-out their balance (which is the NET FORCE, aka FSet) on an object that is experiencing the forces.

RECALL the THREE EQUAL-MAGNITUDE (see STEP 7) PHYSICAL FORCES (see STEP 11B) that the Lumeyne is experiencing:

(i) Forward-acting Fmass(L) = Ff = v(L,CW);

and

(ii) Backward-acting Fg, which has the magnitude of Fmass(G) = v(G, CCW), which is being applied to the particle bottom via the Gravityne’s 5-d COM Tongue;

and

(iii) Backward-acting Ft, which has the magnitude of Fmass(T) = ♉️(T, CW), which is being applied to the particle bottom via the Timeyne’s 6-d COM Tongue, and we know that it’s impossible for the Timeyne to experience external force, so therefore the Timeyne’s velocity ♉️(T,CW) must be the same SPEED as v(T,CW).

So the magnitude and direction of FfSet =  Fmass(L) - Fmass(G)  - Fmass(T)

If we eliminate the Fmass(L) and -Fmass(G) terms on the basis of Evil and Good being Eternal opposites, 

then we conclude that FfSet = Fmass(T) = -Ft 

This tells us that the Lumeyne is “in gear” UPSIDE-DOWN (attempting to move Backward along its own ADL but not getting anywhere), with the rotational velocity of the UPSIDE-DOWN Lumeyne being the same as the rotational velocity of the UPSIDE-DOWN Timeyne,  ♉️(L,CW) =  ♉️(T, CW) 

STEP 11D. LIST OF WAVE-ENERGY (TAX PAYMENTS AND TAX-FREE GIFTS) 

We see that the Lumeyne is generating THREE WAVE-ENERGY tax payments: 

(i) the Lumeyne is generating Ef with the same magnitude but in the opposite direction as Ff, with Ef being the constantly-paid tax on the benefit of “being” (the force of Fmass(L)) that’s being received, and Ef is actually being THRUST out of the particle bottom, which CAUSES the top, or head, of the particle to *apply physical force* in the opposite direction along the ADL, and that’s why the particle “idles”;

and

(ii) the Lumeyne is generating Ef(OPPFg) with the same magnitude but in the opposite direction as Fg to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to the external physical force Fg acting-on the Lumeyne, so it’s like the Gravityne is rendering “moving services” to the Lumeyne and the Lumeyne has to pay 100% tax on Fg, which is trying to get the Lumeyne to haul mass along the ADL in the same direction that the Gravityne is heading, which is the Backward direction (it is actually Ef(OPPFg) being THRUST out of the Lumeyne in the 4-d Forward direction that CAUSES the top, or head, of the Lumeyne to *apply physical force* in the opposite direction, as it tries to “get into gear” and haul mass in the Backward direction in which the Gravityne is heading);

and  

(iii) the Lumeyne is generating Ef(OPPFt) with the same magnitude but in the opposite direction as Ft to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to the external physical force Ft acting-on the Lumeyne, so it’s like the Timeyne is rendering “moving services” to the Lumeyne and the Lumeyne has to pay 100% tax on Ft, which is trying to get the Lumeyne to haul mass along the ADL in the same direction that the Timeyne is heading, which is the Backward direction (it is actually Ef(OPPFt) being THRUST out of the Lumeyne in the 4-d Forward direction that CAUSES the top, or head, of the Lumeyne to *apply physical force* in the opposite direction, as it tries to “get into gear” and haul mass in the Backward direction in which the Timeyne is heading.) 

We see that the Lumeyne is receiving ONE TAX-FREE WAVE-ENERGY GIFT, Eg, with the same magnitude as Fg, and we know that Fmass(L) and Fmass(G) and Fmass(T) must all be of equal magnitude (see STEP 7)—which means that Eg and Ef and Et must have the same magnitude, too, because otherwise the MASS of the particles within one Snowman of God could not remain constant, and a physical container, such as a particle, with indeterminate non-constant mass (a container that could become infinitely small or infinitely large) violates the Law of Conservation of Energy—so therefore we conclude that the way the Lumeyne’s mass remains constant is by constantly expending Ef and receiving Eg. 

STEP 11E. DISCUSSION OF WAVE-ENERGY

Referring-to THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram (see STEP 10) and the diagram of the close-up view of the Lumeyne (see STEP 11A), we see THE INDICATED DISTRIBUTION of the tax-free gifts of WAVE-ENERGY that the Lumeyne generated as tax-payments Ef, Ef(OPPFg) and Ef(OPPFt),  

and the first thing we RECALL is that particle MASS must remain constant within the Snowman of God or else the Law of Conservation of Energy is violated, since (see STEP 7) a container, such as a particle, cannot gain or lose mass indefinitely without becoming infinitely small or infinitely large, and that’s impossible for a CONTAINER to do, 

with the specific “problem to solve” being that PARTICLES RECEIVING “EXTRA MASS”  OR EXPERIENCING “DECLINING MASS” WOULD CEASE TO EXIST, AND THAT WOULD CAUSE THE ENTIRE SNOWMAN OF GOD TO CEASE TO EXIST.

EXTRA MASS, however, could be DUMPED into a NON-CONTAINER, 

and (as we will show) that’s what has to happen to Ef(OPPFt) and Ef(OPPFg), aka Space. 

Space is WAVE-ENERGY, aka MASS, that CAN’T BE USED by a particle without causing the “non-constant MASS problem.” 

And so to repeat the problem: THE PARTICLES RECEIVING THE “EXTRA MASS” WOULD CEASE TO EXIST—AND THAT WOULD CAUSE THE ENTIRE SNOWMAN OF GOD TO CEASE TO EXIST—*UNLESS* THE EXTRA MASS could be DUMPED into a NON-CONTAINER. 

And that’s where the 4-d Forward Direction along the Lumeyne’s ADL comes-in handy, because A DIRECTION IS NOT A CONTAINER, and A DIRECTION is infinite, by definition. 

So WAVE-ENERGY (MASS) that is DUMPED by a particle through the OPEN DOOR to the 4-d Forward direction becomes SPACE when there is NO CONTAINER BLOCKING THE PATH TO THE “DUMPING GROUND.” 

But keep in mind that SPACE dumped in the 4-d Forward direction is not “going into the universe,” because the universe is the 3rd dimension. 

And we also have to REMEMBER that because there is NOTHING BEHIND the 6-d COM, when a Timeyne applies Et in the Backward direction on its own ADL, that is also like having an OPEN DOOR TO A DUMPING GROUND.

But to repeat the problem: When THE PATH TO A DUMPING GROUND IS BLOCKED BY ANOTHER PARTICLE, then that’s A CONTAINER, not A DIRECTION, into which the wave-energy (mass) is going, and that’s when we have to worry-about “the non-constant MASS problem.” 

So to put the “dumping wave-energy (mass)” PROCESS in terms of A LAW of physics, we could say that every particle (container) has a RIGHT-OF-FIRST-REFUSAL to ACCEPT every TAX-FREE GIFT OF WAVE-ENERGY (MASS) that it is OFFERED, but if the container (particle) *cannot accept* the free gift of the wave-energy (MASS) it is offered without violating the Law of Conservation of Energy, then the particle MUST REJECT THE WAVE-ENERGY, *and also* the particle MUST HAVE AN OPEN DOOR through which to RE-GIFT (aka DUMP) the rejected wave-energy (MASS) to avoid violating the Laws of Physics and ceasing to exist,  

and if a particle must “send un-usable wave-energy (MASS) through its own house,” i.e., THROUGH ITSELF, to get the wave-energy (MASS) *out*, i.e., to REJECT THE FREE GIFT, then that is like ACCEPTING THE GIFT, NOT REJECTING IT.

Now RECALL that a particle cannot receive its own wave-energy (for example, the Lumeyne can’t pay tax then take the tax-payment back by calling the payment a tax-free gift to itself, and the way this works in practice is that the Lumeyne simply cannot “see” its own wave-energy as being “separate from itself”), so a particle can AND MUST generate wave-energy in a *required direction* from whatever “part of itself” is “pointing” in the *required direction*, whether or not there is an OPEN DOOR to a dumping ground in that direction!

The point is that SATISFYING NEWTON’S THIRD LAW OF MOTION and DUMPING TAX-FREE GIFTS OF WAVE-ENERGY THAT CANNOT BE ACCEPTED are TWO DIFFERENT DUTIES that a particle has.

So now NOTICE that if the mass of one particle in a Snowman of God INCREASES, then the mass of the other particles in the same Snowman has to *increase simultaneously by the same amount*, with THE PENALTY for violating that condition being IMMEDIATE NON-EXISTENCE of the particles within the Snowman of God. 

The penalty of non-existence, however, is impossible to impose, because it’s impossible for an ETERNAL thing to CEASE TO EXIST.

But it’s nevertheless instructive to think-about the reason for the (impossible to pay) penalty of non-existence of the particles comprising a Snowman of God: It’s because a particle with mass is NOT LIKE A VEHICLE’S GAS TANK, which TAKES TIME TO EMPTY AND FILL, so THERE MIGHT BE A PROBLEM with a gas tank, but then again there might not be a problem, that depends-on HOW LONG THE GAS-TANK-FILLING VIOLATIONS PERSIST, like: 

“I’m going to COUNT TO THREE and I don’t wanna see any more of that gas-tank-filling-violation activity, I mean lay your hand on that gas tank ONCE, TWICE, THREE TIMES, ok fine, but DO IT AGAIN and you’ll regret doing it the first time!” 

Airplane Passenger: [Fight Club] Are there a lot of these types of accidents?

NARRATOR: You wouldn’t believe.

Airplane Passenger: Which car company do you work for?

NARRATOR: A major one.

But GOD DOES NOT PLAY DICE.

Now FINALLY, we can finish discussing THE INDICATED DISTRIBUTION of the TAX-FREE GIFTS comprising the Lumeyne’s generated WAVE-ENERGY, Ef, Ef(OPPFt) and Ef(OPPFg), as shown in the diagram of THE SLEEPING GIANT (see STEP 10) and in the close-up view of the Lumeyne (see STEP 11A).

Next, we’ve got to account-for Ef. 

Let’s zoom-in on the “sleeping” Timeyne in the UPSIDE-DOWN orientation:  

We see that Ef is being ACCEPTED BY THE TIMEYNE as the Timeyne is constantly being given the *right of first refusal* by the Lumeyne to take the FREE GIFT of Ef based-on how the Timeyne’s Tongue is positioned on the particle bottom of the Lumeyne.

We also see WHY the Timeyne is ACCEPTING Ef, and it’s because the Timeyne is constantly EXPENDING Et, which has the same magnitude as Ef, and so by constantly accepting Ef, the Timeyne’s mass always remains constant.

Then we further see that Et, which is the Timeyne’s Natural wave-energy, is being offered to the Gravityne, which is why I think-of Father Time in the UPSIDE-DOWN orientation as Santa Claus.

But we still further see that THE GRAVITYNE CAN’T REJECT Et, because the Gravityne does not have an OPEN DOOR through which to DUMP Et, but rather, the Gravityne would first have to PASS Et THROUGH ITSELF before the Gravityne could send Et anywhere else, and that would constitute an ACCEPTANCE of Et, not a rejection. 

That’s not a problem!

We confirm that there is no problem with the Gravityne’s acceptance of Et by looking closer at the Gravityne:  

We notice that the Gravityne is constantly EXPENDING Eg, which has the same magnitude as Et, so therefore by constantly accepting Et, the Gravityne’s mass always remains constant.

And we also notice that thinking-about where Eg is going BRINGS US “FULL-CIRCLE” to the Lumeyne (see STEP 11A), which we see HAS TO ACCEPT Eg because there’s no OPEN DOOR through which to DUMP Eg. 

Then we more clearly see that the Lumeyne is holding its mass constant by accepting Eg at the same time as Ef is being expended.  

So NOW WE CAN CONFIRM our conclusion that Ef(OPPFt) and Ef(OPPFg) must be REJECTED (as explained below) AND DUMPED THROUGH AN OPEN DOOR to keep all of the particles of God in-tact before the Big Bang, because all of the particles have constant mass without Ef(OPPFt) and Ef(OPPFg)!

Regarding Ef(OPPFt), we see that Ef(OPPFt) is being generated by the Lumeyne to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion because Ft is acting-on the Lumeyne in the Backward direction (trying to get the Lumeyne to move in the Backward direction along the Lumeyne’s own ADL), so Ef(OPPFt) must be emitted in the Forward direction along the Lumeyne’s ADL, and the only way the Lumeyne has to do that is by generating Ef(OPPFt) at the “point” of the 6-d COM Tongue, which means that Ef(OPPFt) is going to be OFFERED-TO THE 6-d COM TONGUE of the Timeyne first, then the 6-d COM Tongue is going to have to REJECT it, whereupon it will automatically be DUMPED onto the the 5-d COM TONGUE of the Gravityne, which will also have to  REJECT it, so then it will automatically be DUMPED AGAIN, this time in the 4-d Forward direction to become SPACE.

QUESTION: Why couldn’t the Timeyne reject and dump Ef and accept Ef(OPPFt) instead?