Article 3. WE ARE HERE: Direction Diction
The above silent film was made over 100 years ago, so it’s worth watching for that reason alone!
But more significantly, the film was made for “lay people” a century ago to help them understand the then-NEW concept of RELATIVITY in the context of Albert Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, which is the widely-accepted “theory of gravity” today.
But I REJECT the General Theory of Relativity, and in this article I will explain one reason why:
The General Theory of Relativity says that ALL DIRECTION IS RELATIVE, which is false, and God’s existence (Article 1. GOOD AFTERNOON MR. DAWKINS: There Is One Who Is Good) proves it.
Let’s go to the movie to see how we can PROVE that ALL DIRECTION IS NOT RELATIVE.
We don’t even have to watch the entire silent movie!
We only have to watch about two minutes of it: Time 4:20 through Time 6:28.
At Time 5:29, the film begins the discussion of DIRECTION in the universe.
The earth is depicted as a sphere in space, and we are taken to a place far above the earth so that we can look directly at the North Pole.
Then at Time 5:54 we are shown an arrow that is planted at a certain longitude and latitude on the earth’s surface.
We watch how the arrow points in different directions as the earth turns on its axis.
This makes it easy for us to envision the earth itself being like a 3-d (spherical) compass, with the arrow planted on the earth’s surface pointing in different directions of the compass as the earth turns on its axis.
The film confirms our observations, telling us:
“To the man on earth the arrow always points up. To us out here in space it points in all directions.”
And that makes perfect sense so far.
Next, at Time 6:09, the film tells us:
“Direction is seen to be only relative. What we called ‘Up’ and ‘Down’ on earth is meaningless to us out in space. This is…shown when two captains [one on the North Pole and one on the South Pole] on earth order flags ‘raised’ on their vessels.”
Then the film asks us:
“Are both flags UP as we look at them from our position out here in space?”
The film does not answer the question, thereby IMPLYING that the answer is “NO.”
But my answer is: “YES, when the two flags are being raised on opposite poles of the earth, then they are moving in opposite ‘Forward,’ aka ‘UP,’ directions.”
Explanation:
RECALL that the proof of God’s existence (Article 1. GOOD AFTERNOON: There Is One Who Is Good) assures us that there is ONE direction—toward God—that is Absolute.
I call the Absolute direction “Backward.”
All non-Backward directions must be RELATIVE to the Backward direction, but the ABSOLUTE-NESS (the SINGULARITY) of the Backward direction means that the Backward direction is NOT RELATIVE to any other direction.
In fact, the Backward direction and all other directions must be MUTUALLY-EXCLUSIVE.
So we can call all non-Backward directions “Forward” directions.
This means that all 3-d directions in the universe are Forward directions.
So let’s refer-to all 3-d directions in the universe as “3-d Forward directions.”
And again, we know that all 3-d Forward directions are RELATIVE to the Backward direction.
Of course we also know that all 3-d Forward directions in the universe are also RELATIVE to each other; this is the information that Albert Einstein (and the film) provided to us!
We can better envision all of the 3-d Forward directions on earth by imagining that the earth itself is a spherical compass.
When we do that we see that when the two flags are being raised on opposite poles of the earth, the flags are BOTH MOVING IN THE FORWARD DIRECTION—they are both moving “UP”—but they are moving in OPPOSITE 3-D FORWARD DIRECTIONS ON THE SPHERICAL COMPASS that is the earth itself.
Now we also see that the 3-d Forward direction of a particular flag is THE SAME regardless whether we are looking at that flag ON EARTH or IN SPACE!
Verify this for yourself by choosing one flag to think-about, then think about that flag some more:
Whether you are looking at that flag being RAISED ON EARTH while you are ON THE EARTH or while you are OUT IN SPACE, when you envision the earth as a spherical compass, then you see the flag moving in the same direction on the compass no matter where you are located!
So that’s another FACT that Albert Einstein (and the film) was missing, to wit:
WE DO NOT LOSE OUR SENSE OF DIRECTION IN SPACE!
“UP” (FORWARD) AND “DOWN” (BACKWARD) DO NOT BECOME MEANINGLESS TO US IN SPACE!
We retain our sense of direction in space because “EVERYWHERE WE GO, THERE WE ARE,” by which I mean that wherever we are in the universe, we must have “A FORWARD LOCATION” RELATIVE-TO THE BACKWARD DIRECTION, aka GOD, aka THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE.
From the POV of the Backward direction (aka THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE, aka GOD), the center-of-mass (“COM”) of every object in the universe—the COM of an object being THE ORIGIN, and Backward-most part, of the object, by definition—must have a UNIQUE “universal Forward-direction coordinate,” because no two things can occupy the same position at the same time.
This is the concept referred-to as “ABSOLUTE SPACE.”
Isaac Newton’s work—“classical mechanics,” or “Newtonian mechanics”—is based-on the premise of ABSOLUTE SPACE.
But NOTE that presently, “Newtonian mechanics” is reportedly (source: Livescience.com, “What Is Classical Mechanics?”) only applicable to objects “larger than a molecule and smaller than a planet.”
That is surely an error in applicable scope, however, because God’s existence—and in particular, the existence of the Backward direction—proves that EVERY OBJECT IN THE UNIVERSE, NO MATTER HOW SMALL OR LARGE, HAS AN ABSOLUTE POSITION IN THE UNIVERSE, which means that “Newtonian mechanics” should be universally-applicable.
But of course we can never figure-out anything’s ABSOLUTE POSITION in the universe because we would need the POV of God to determine that information!
But what we have figured-out by deduction (see Article 1) is that 3-d matter (ATOMS) had to be created from the LIGHT part of God, which we know must be in the 4th dimension.
That’s how we know that LIGHT IS ABSOLUTE and MATTER IS RELATIVE-TO LIGHT.
One conclusion we can draw from the FACT that matter is relative-to light is that that the direction in which light moves is not one of the 3-d Forward directions, which are all the directions on a spherical compass, in which matter moves.
IN ADDITION TO THE 3-d Forward directions of matter (atoms), which are all the directions on a spherical compass, there must be a 4-d Forward direction—AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE—and that is THE DIRECTION IN WHICH LIGHT ACTS.
A second conclusion we can draw from the FACT that matter is relative-to light is that THE SPEED OF LIGHT is an Absolute “speed limit” in the universe (corroborating source: Astronomy.com, “What is the speed of light? Here’s the history, discovery of the cosmic speed limit); another way to explain the ABSOLUTE-NESS of light is to say that from the POV of matter, “the speed of light is a constant.”
In other words, we don’t even need to CONDUCT EXPERIMENTS to prove that “the speed of light is a constant”!
The deductive proof that MATTER IS CREATED-FROM, AND THEREFORE RELATIVE-TO, LIGHT is both Necessary and sufficient to prove the Truth of the matter that “the speed of light is Absolute,” or stated another way, “the speed of light is a constant.”
But WHAT DOES IT MEAN, AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, when we say that “the speed of light is Absolute,” or “the speed of light is a constant”???
To better understand what it MEANS to say that “the speed of light is Absolute,” or “the speed of light is a constant,” we can conduct a two-part thought experiment.
Let’s give this thought-experiment a name—“The Two-Part Thought Experiment About Relativity”—so we can refer back to it later.
FIRST PART (regarding MUTUAL-RELATIVITY) of The Two-Part Thought Experiment About Relativity:
Imagine that you’re sitting next to a window in a vehicle.
Pretend that you fell asleep in your seat, and while you were sleeping—unbeknownst to you—the vehicle started moving, entered a highway, and began traveling in “the slow lane” at a constant 55 MPH (about 88 KPH.)
Next imagine that the ride was so smooth that when you woke-up, you didn’t realize that you were moving, you thought you were still parked.
Now imagine that as soon as you woke-up, you looked out the window and you saw a vehicle coming-up from behind you—unbeknownst to you, the vehicle was going in the same direction as you on the same highway in “the fast lane”—passing-by your window at a slow constant speed that you correctly judged to be 5 MPH (8 KPH.)
Question: What was the actual speed of the passing vehicle?
Answer: 60 MPH (about 96 KPH.)
Explanation:
This seems like an ordinary phenomenon that we experience so often that it collapses into a mere observation that defies explanation.
But it’s a lot more than a mere observation; there is a PHYSICAL EXPLANATION for the phenomenon!
The two vehicles moving in the same direction on the same highway are examples of two things that are MUTUALLY-RELATIVE.
When two things are MUTUALLY-RELATIVE, both of the things are RELATIVE TO THE SAME ABSOLUTE in “the scene” where the things are found.
What it means as a practical matter for two objects to be RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER, aka MUTUALLY-RELATIVE, is that one object’s OBJECTIVE PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE OF ITS OWN MOTION will be altered by the motion of the other object when the objects are physically interacting with each other, AND ALSO—AS WE SEE IN THE CASE OF THE TWO CARS ON THE HIGHWAY, which are not interacting with each other physically—EVEN THE SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION OF AN OBJECT’S OWN MOTION will be altered BY THE MERE OBSERVATION of the motion of the other object!
The two vehicles on the highway are both made of MATTER (ATOMS), and the vehicles are moving in the same 3-d Forward direction on the earth’s surface, and we know that all 3-d Forward directions are RELATIVE-TO the Backward (ABSOLUTE) direction.
We would therefore conclude that there is MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between the two vehicles in the “highway scene” because they are both moving RELATIVE TO THE SAME ABSOLUTE (the Backward direction) in that scene.
So from the POV of one vehicle, the speed of the other vehicle is always going to be RELATIVE-TO its own speed.
For example, from your POV in your vehicle, the speed of the passing vehicle is always going to be RELATIVE-TO your speed.
AND WE VERIFIED THIS with personal experience, observing that IF YOU DIDN’T KNOW that you were traveling in “the slow lane” of a highway at a constant speed of 55 MPH (if you thought you were stationary), then when another vehicle passed-by your window from behind at a constant speed of 60 MPH—going in the same direction as you on the same highway but in “the fast lane”—YOU WOULD HAVE TO CONCLUDE THAT THE SPEED OF THE OTHER VEHICLE WAS 5 MPH, not 60 MPH!
SECOND PART (regarding ABSOLUTENESS) of The Two-Part Thought Experiment About Relativity:
We’ve got to EXPLAIN WHAT, EXACTLY, IT MEANS when we say that “the speed of light is Absolute,” or “the speed of light is a constant.”
One thing it means is that MATTER (ATOMS) can never “catch up” to the speed of light, because the 3rd dimension cannot “reach” the 4th dimension; that’s impossible.
So right here is where we need to start imagining ourselves—our bodies made-of matter—“chasing” a light beam.
Pretend that you are traveling Forward alongside a beam of light.
In fact your mass would have to be PUSHED to travel Forward like this, but just ignore that fact because otherwise that’s going to be the end of the thought experiment! If your mass was being PUSHED, then (unless you were a particle with the mass of one “light beam,” in which case you’re in 4-d not 3-d) the speed of your mass would have to be determined by HOW MUCH MASS was being pushed, and by definition mass can’t become MASS-LESS, so therefore even if you didn’t have very much mass, if you were more than one particle in the 4th dimension with the mass of one “light beam” then you could never reach the speed of light.
OK so again just PRETEND that you are traveling Forward alongside a beam of light.
Next note that your mass is heading in a 3-d Forward direction and the light beam is heading in the 4-d Forward direction, so your mass and the light beam are not moving in the same direction, or even in the same dimension.
The significance of your mass and the light beam being in different dimensions is what the thought experiment is going to make more clear.
What won’t be clarified in detail until the end of the article, however, is how it would be possible for different beams of light to travel in the same 4-d Forward direction along different lines.
SPOILER ALERT: The reason is because no two light sources can occupy the same position, and all light sources are RELATIVE-TO the same Absolute source of light (the ORIGIN OF LIGHT, which is the ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE), so therefore light beams generated by different light sources would move along different lines even if the light beams were all traveling in the 4-d Forward direction toward the same destination.
Now envision your mass ALMOST moving at the speed of light.
Then get even more specific and imagine that you are moving at a speed that is EXACTLY 5 MPH (8 KPH) less than the speed of light.
NEXT PRETEND THAT YOU FALL ASLEEP AND YOU FORGET THAT YOU ARE MOVING, BUT IN FACT YOU STILL KEEP-ON MOVING AT A SPEED THAT IS EXACTLY 5 MPH LESS THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT.
Now imagine that you wake-up suddenly, and as soon as you open your eyes, you look over at the light beam passing-by you at a speed that is IN FACT only 5 MPH GREATER than your speed.
Question: At what speed do you PERCEIVE the light beam to be moving?
Answer: 670,616, 629 MPH (1,079,252,848.8 KPH)
Explanation:
There is NOT MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between your mass and the light beam; your mass is RELATIVE-TO the light beam, but the light beam is NOT RELATIVE-TO YOU.
THERE IS NOTHING A RELATIVE THING CAN DO TO CHANGE THE MOTION OF AN ABSOLUTE THING. Even the PHYSICAL MOTION of a RELATIVE THING cannot alter the RELATIVE THING’S PERCEPTION of the motion of an ABSOLUTE THING.
This is because forcefully, a RELATIVE THING is “ALL ZEROS” in comparison to the Absolute thing!
In other words, A RELATIVE THING IS POWERLESS compared-to an ABSOLUTE thing.
Being RELATIVE to the light beam, your speed is ZERO, your mass is ZERO, your energy is ZERO, your position is ZERO (you are literally in a lower dimension; your mass does not even EXIST in light’s dimension, which means that light can “touch your mass,” but your mass cannot “reach” light to act-upon it.)
Forcefully, YOU ARE ALL ZEROS RELATIVE-TO THE ABSOLUTE light beam.
Likewise, from your POV, the Absolute light beam is forcefully “ALL 100s”—CONSTANT 100s—speed is 100, energy is 100, position is UNREACHABLE (a light beam is literally in a higher-dimension than mass!)
So regardless of what your mass is doing—even if it is moving ALMOST at the speed of light—that will not affect your PERCEPTION of the light beam’s speed, because TO REPEAT: Your mass’s applied force could not affect the EXPERIENCE of the light beam ONE IOTA regardless of what your mass did; forcefully, your mass is “ALL ZEROS” from the POV of the light beam.
The light beam is ABSOLUTE and your mass is RELATIVE-TO the light beam.
The light beam in the 4th dimension is all 100s and your mass in the 3rd dimension is all ZEROs.
Question: What if, while you were sleeping, you had a SCIENCE-FICTION DREAM, and in your SCIENCE-FICTION DREAM your mass was one particle in the 4th dimension and you caught-up to the light beam, then you looked-over at the light beam while you were traveling at the exact speed of light; at what speed would you PERCEIVE the light beam to be moving?
Answer: ZERO; your mass would perceive the light beam to be stationary.
And that—ZERO hahaha—is literally all that Albert Einstein was saying with his own light beam thought-experiment (source: University of Pittsburgh, “Chasing a Beam of Light: Einstein’s Most Famous Thought Experiment”)
NO MATH IS REQUIRED TO DO THE LIGHT BEAM THOUGHT-EXPERIMENT.
Question: What does the perception of a stationary light beam in space have to do with “the downfall of the great achievement of nineteenth century physics, the ether [ether is the medium that physicists said filled ‘empty space’ and served to transmit electromagnetic and gravitational forces], which then provided the basis for all electromagnetic theory” (again see University of Pittsburgh, “Chasing a Beam of Light: Einstein’s Most Famous Thought Experiment”)?
Answer: Being A MEDIUM (not light), “ether” could not reach the speed of light, and that limitation of ether would make it impossible for a light beam to be PERCEIVED to be stationary from the POV of “the ether.” BUT EVEN MORE SIGNIFICANTLY, obviously, it would be impossible for light to travel “through” ANY MEDIUM, because all mediums are RELATIVE-TO light!
So the understanding of ABSOLUTENESS ends the “ether” theory of space.
And of course WE PROVED God’s existence, and God’s existence necessarily means that the entire universe, including matter and SPACE, was MADE FROM LIGHT, ergo, we have enough information to conclude that SPACE *IS* LIGHT IN MOTION.
THE MEANING OF ABSOLUTENESS is what Albert Einstein and the author of the article “Chasing a Beam of Light: Einstein’s Most Famous Thought Experiment” was missing.
And it’s impossible to understand ABSOLUTENESS unless you understand DIRECTION, because it is THE POSITIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TWO THINGS—more specifically, it is THING #1 BEING BEHIND (Backward-of) THING #2, which is the same as saying that THING #2 IS ON-TOP-OF (IN-FRONT-OF) THING #1—that makes THING #1 ABSOLUTE from the POV of THING #1.
So that is THE END of The Two-Part Thought Experiment About Relativity.
Unfortunately, we lost Einstein at God.
Einstein paid lip-service to God, but as we have seen, as a practical matter Einstein followed Alice down the proverbial rabbit hole of DIRECTIONLESS space, insisting that “UP” and “DOWN” were meaningless concepts and that ALL DIRECTION IS RELATIVE, which we have proven to be FALSE.
To repeat what we’ve established about DIRECTION so far: The proof of God’s existence (see Article 1) assures us that there is ONE direction—toward God—that is Absolute. I call the Absolute direction Backward. All non-Backward directions, which I call Forward, must be RELATIVE to the Backward direction, but the ABSOLUTE-NESS (the SINGULARITY) of the Backward direction means that the Backward direction is NOT RELATIVE to any other direction, and this assures us that every object in the universe must have a unique “universal Forward-direction coordinate” because no two things can occupy the same position. This is the concept of ABSOLUTE SPACE. We have proven that Isaac Newton was correct and Albert Einstein was wrong about the ABSOLUTENESS OF SPACE. And the speed of light being Absolute (constant) compels us to further conclude that IN ADDITION to the 3-d Forward directions of matter (ATOMS), which are all the directions on a spherical compass, there is a 4-d Forward direction—the direction AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE—and that is THE DIRECTION IN WHICH LIGHT ACTS.
The 3-d Forward directions of matter (ATOMS) must all be RELATIVE-TO the 4-d Forward direction.
And of course the 3-d Forward directions of matter AND the 4-d Forward direction of light must be RELATIVE-TO the Backward direction.
Whoa! Stop the presses!
Now START THE PRESSES again!
Because that’s how we can LOGICALLY VERIFY that the UNIQUE “universal Forward-direction coordinate” (the POSITION IN ABSOLUTE SPACE) of the COM of every object ON EARTH is a 4-d COORDINATE!
Check it out: If we had God’s POV, then we too could “translate” a 3-d spherical compass direction of a massive object—such as a flag being raised—on earth into the 4-d universal Forward-direction coordinate system VERY SIMPLY, BY SIMPLY ADDING-ON the 4-d Forward direction of light ON EARTH to the 3-d spherical compass direction!
That would work because the 4-d Forward direction of light ON EARTH is Necessarily going to be the singular 4-d Forward direction that is AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE, because moving AWAY FROM THE COM OF THE EARTH in the singular 4-d Forward direction that is AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE is the only way on earth that it’s possible for light to get farther away from THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE!
So therefore if we knew the unique 4-d coordinate of the COM-of-the-earth, then that would allow us to PIN-POINT every object of, on or around the earth in 4-d.
Then we could use the information about the unique 4-d coordinate of the earth’s COM to estimate the unique 4-d coordinates of the COMs of other celestial bodies.
For an astronomer or a cosmologist, that might be like finding “the Holy Grail.”
But I feel like we’ve already found “the Holy Grail” of theoretical physics, because now we KNOW enough to NOTE FOR-THE-RECORD that THE FORCEFUL MOVEMENT OF LIGHT AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN OF UNIVERSE IN THE 4-D FORWARD DIRECTION means that LIGHT IS A 4-d FORWARD-ACTING FORCE IN THE UNIVERSE.
So let’s call the FORWARD-acting FORCE OF LIGHT “Ff” for short.
And let’s not miss this opportunity to NOTE that THE FORCE OF LIGHT, Ff, is another name for THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE.
Recall from the Astronomy.com article cited above (“What is the speed of light? Here’s the history, discovery of the cosmic speed limit) that “[James Clerk] Maxwell found that electricity and magnetism were really two sides of the same coin, both manifestations of a single electromagnetic force….when Maxwell went to calculate the speed of these electromagnetic waves, he was surprised to see the speed of light pop out — the first theoretical calculation of this important number.”
But also recall from the Astronomy.com article that modern science has concluded that light slows-down when it travels “through a medium,” and that conclusion would seem to CONTRADICT the Absoluteness of light!
But there is no contradiction—WE HAVE ALREADY PROVEN THAT LIGHT CANNOT “TRAVEL THROUGH A MEDIUM” (MATTER/ATOMS), BUT WE CAN ALSO SAY THAT LIGHT DOES NOT “SLOW DOWN” IN “THE PRESENCE OF A MEDIUM” (MATTER/ATOMS)—but rather, what is actually happening is that THE LIGHT FORCE (THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE) THAT IS APPLIED TO MATTER CAUSES MOVEMENT OF THE MATTER, and the speed of the matter will depend-on its MASS, and in fact, the only speed we can actually MEASURE WITH INSTRUMENTS (which are made-of MATTER) is the speed of MATTER, and the speed of matter is always going to be LESS than the speed of light.
The Backward direction is illustrated by again considering the example of two boat captains on opposite poles of the earth with flags on their vessels, but this time THINK-ABOUT THE FLAGS BEING “DROPPED” instead of being “raised.”
The Backward direction can be clearly seen in the flag scene by using your mind to draw a purple arrow that starts at each flag and points-toward the CENTER OF MASS (“COM”) OF THE EARTH.
The COM of the earth is the “beginning” of the earth.
This means that all other parts of the earth are RELATIVE to the COM.
This also means that the COM of the earth is the part of the earth that is closest to THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE, aka God.
So in other words, the COM of the earth is the Backward-most part of the earth.
NOW WE SEE that THE FALLING FLAGS ARE MOVING IN THE SAME DIRECTION—Backward—TOWARD THE COM OF THE EARTH.
This is the only way the flags can get closer to THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE, which is where God is located.
The flags are MOVING BACKWARD ALONG DIFFERENT LINES because no two things can be in the same position at the same Time.
So therefore every object must move Backward (toward THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE) ALONG A DIFFERENT LINE between its own center-of-mass (“COM”) and the COM of the object that is blocking its Backward path.
And again, we see that the COM of the earth is the Backward-most part of the earth, which means that the COM of the earth is blocking the Backward path of the flags (and all other objects of, on and around the earth), so that the only way that the flags (or any other object of, on or around the earth) can move Backward is to move toward the COM of the earth.
Boom!
We can now deduce that the Backward direction—toward THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE—also has to be the “GRAVITY DIRECTION,” which is the direction of THE ORIGIN OF THE FORCE OF GRAVITY (“Fg” for short.)
Here’s how we can make that deduction in FIVE QUICK STEPS:
Step 1. We know by observation that THE FORCE OF GRAVITY EXISTS.
Step 2. We recall (again see Article 1) that we’ve deduced that the entity of God must be comprised-of THREE PARTS in DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS:
(i) a LIGHT part in the 4th dimension
(ii) a mutually-exclusive singularly DARK part in the 5th dimension, to which the LIGHT part is RELATIVE
(iii) a Jesus/God-The-Father CONTROLLING part in the 6th dimension, which is the Backward-most part of God, aka “the Beginning” of God.
Step 3. We also recall that we’ve deduced that the universe must have been made from the LIGHT part of God in the 4th dimension, which must have moved AWAY from THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE when it went BANG!
Step 4. So therefore the DARK part must cause movement IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION as the LIGHT part, which means that the DARK part causes movement TOWARD THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE.
Step 5. Ergo, the DARK part must be THE ENERGY, aka THE FORCE, OF GRAVITY (Fg), which means that the force of gravity comes-from OUTSIDE OF THE UNIVERSE.
FINALLY, we can NOTE that we’ve established that the Absolute 4-d Forward direction—the direction in which THE FORCE OF LIGHT (Ff) acts—AWAY FROM THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE is the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION.
So now we can say something else about the 4-d Forward direction, aka the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION: We can say that regardless of location in the universe, the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION is always going to be ALONG THE SAME LINE as the Backward direction, aka the GRAVITY DIRECTION.
Let’s call that line the ABSOLUTE DIRECTION LINE (“ADL”.)
But to repeat from above: The 3-d Forward directions of matter (ATOMS) must all be RELATIVE-TO the 4-d Forward direction, and of course the 3-d Forward directions AND the 4-d Forward direction of light must be RELATIVE-TO the Backward direction, so matter cannot move along the ADL in the 4-d Forward direction or the Backward direction, matter can only move in the 3-d Forward directions (or simply “3-d directions.”)
And that’s OK because we also know that all matter will MOVE BACKWARD (but not in exactly the 5-d Backward direction, that would be impossible, but rather, in a 3-d Forward direction toward THE ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE) ALONG DIFFERENT LINES because no two things can occupy the same position in Space; and more specifically we can say that every object will move toward the origin of the universe along the 3-d line between its own center-of-mass (“COM”) and the COM of the object that is blocking its Backward path.
Ergo, the 3-d directions roughly corresponding to the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION and the GRAVITY DIRECTION are always going to VARY OBJECT-TO-OBJECT—and so the scientist is always going to have to CHOOSE A FRAME OF REFERENCE based-on the OBJECT-OF-INTEREST (“OOI”) in every “scene” being analyzed—but it will always be True that the 3-d direction roughly corresponding to the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION will be IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION ALONG THE SAME LINE as the 3-d direction roughly corresponding to the GRAVITY (Backward) DIRECTION for any OOI under study.
And it bears repeating again that THE LINE—let’s call it the “OADL”—that defines the 3-d directions roughly corresponding to the GRAVITY (Backward) DIRECTION and the GRAVITY-OPPOSING (4-d Forward) DIRECTION for any given OOI is always going to be drawn between the OOI’s COM and the COM of the object that is blocking the OOI’s Backward path.
This ability to specifically locate the OADL for any OOI in the universe will in theory enable the scientist to apply the same Laws of Physics—“Classical Mechanics”—to everything in the universe, from atoms to galaxies.
OK that’s a lot to digest!
Let’s stop here and look-over what we’ve figured-out so far:
We further conclude by deduction that the 6-d Forward direction is the same as the 4-d Forward direction, because the Backward direction must be singular, and there could be NO REST BEFORE THE BIG BANG and NO BIG BANG if the force of the 6th dimension could not act-on the light part of God in *both* the GRAVITY DIRECTION, aka the Backward direction, *and* in the GRAVITY-OPPOSING DIRECTION, aka the 4-d Forward direction.
We NOTE that there could be NO BIG BANG if there was no force in the 6th dimension (meaning if there were only two parts of God, the Backward-acting force of gravity and the Forward-acting force of light) because the force of gravity and the force of light would have to be BALANCED (meaning of equal magnitude) for there to be REST BEFORE THE BIG BANG, and then *even if* the force of gravity could “turn around” and act-on the light part of God in the 4-d Forward direction, that would only solve the problem of giving the light part of God a way to MOVE FORWARD, but it would NOT ENABLE the light part of God to MOVE BACKWARD after it started MOVING FORWARD! And we see by observation that matter moves BOTH Forward AND Backward.
So this is another way to CONFIRM OUR DEDUCTION that GOD MUST BE A THREE-PART MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ENTITY, not a one-part entity or a two-part entity. And then of course we also know that God cannot be a four-or-more-part entity because that would LACK UTILITY and introduce REDUNDANCY where redundancy is UNNECESSARY.
“Wait. Hold-up. Why don’t we have to worry about God being a four-or-more-part multi-dimensional entity?” Someone might ask because maybe the answer wasn’t entirely clear in Article 1.
ANSWER: Because in Reality—in Self-consciousness—there’s Good and there’s Evil and there’s Just-ness, and anything else is redundant; and in fact, Just-ness must be made out of Evil (because Justice requires delivering Injustice to the Unjust, but it’s not Good to do Injustice that’s impossible, so therefore Justice, aka “virtue” as Dr. Jordan Peterson puts it, must be A CHOICE to NOT DO EVIL that it is possible to do), but Just-ness and Good-ness must be qualitatively equal (because to say that there’s a “greater virtue” is to destroy the principle of virtue), even though Just-ness and Good-ness must have mutually-exclusive CAUSES (because again, Good-ness is singular and inherent, it is NOT made out of Evil, whereas Justice must be made out of A CHOICE to NOT DO EVIL), so in Reality LOVE is all you need, but it is not Good to be alone.
“But where does that leave animals?” Is the obvious next QUESTION.
Are animals automatons, or do they have a consciousness that is beyond LOVE, which in that case would mean that LOVE is properly called a *limitation* of Self-consciousness that animals do not have?
ANSWER: I am *inclined* to say that “animal“ consciousness is UNLIMITED consciousness that is so pure that it cannot suffer Injustice, brought to LIFE by God to make Self-conscious human beings on earth *possible*.
NOW BEFORE WE LEAVE ARTICLE 3, WE CAN RE-CAP NINE QUICK FACTS WE’VE ALREADY LEARNED ABOUT MATTER:
Fact 1. We are ASSUMING the existence of ATOMS (we have to explain HOW atoms were created, but we’re going to assume that all massive objects—from molecules to stars—are made of ATOMS.)
Fact 2. WE KNOW that atoms had to be made-from light, which means that an atom must be RELATIVE-TO light, and more specifically, it means that an atom must be ON-TOP-OF light (in other words, light must be BEHIND an atom.)
Fact 3. AN ATOM MUST HAVE TWO PARTS:
The first part of an atom is a Positionally Absolute Part, which is the Backward-most part of the atom;
and
The second part of an atom is a Positionally Relative Part, aka an “Atomic Mass” part, which is ON-TOP-OF (meaning FORWARD-OF, OR IN-FRONT-OF) the Positionally Absolute Part.
Fact 4. The Positionally Absolute Part of an atom must be at the “center-of-mass” (“COM”) of the atom, because that is the only way to guarantee that the 3-d Atomic Mass part of the atom can exist-in—and thereby move-in!—all of the 3-d Forward directions.
Fact 5. The Positionally Absolute Part (the COM) of every atom can only move (or attempt to move) along the OADL.
Fact 6. So we must conclude that the movement (or attempted movement) of an atom’s COM (Positionally Absolute Part) along the OADL is what CAUSES the movement (or attempted movement) of an atom’s Atomic Mass part in a specific 3-d Forward direction (and here let’s define one “Atomic 3-d Forward degree” on a spherical compass to be equal to the “width” of one particle, to differentiate atoms from particles and to differentiate atoms from each other, and in theory enable the scientist to apply the same Laws of Physics to everything in the universe, from atoms to galaxies.)
Fact 7. We must also conclude that atoms having OVERLAPPING OADLs is one reason why TWO OOIs (for example, TWO ATOMS) COLLIDE.
Fact 8. We must further conclude that another reason for two OOIs (for example, two atoms) to collide would be NON-OVERLAPPING (parallel) OADLs but OVERLAPPING ATOMIC MASS PARTS, in which case the Atomic Mass Parts would be moving either THE SAME or OPPOSITE 3-d Forward directions.
Fact 9. For example, it would be possible for two OOIs (for example, TWO ATOMS) to have OVERLAPPING OADLs that are ABSOLUTELY COINCIDENT, in which case the angle between the OADLs would be either 180 Atomic 3-d Forward degrees on a spherical compass *or* ZERO Atomic 3-d Forward degrees on a spherical compass, and that could cause OOIs to COLLIDE in different but OPPOSITE *or* THE SAME 3-d Forward directions, respectively;
in another example, two OOIs (such as TWO ATOMS) could have OVERLAPPING OADLs that are INTERSECTING, in which case the angle between the OADLs would be GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE Atomic 3-d Forward degree on a spherical compass, AND as between the Atomic Mass Parts of the OOIs, they would occupy different and non-opposite Atomic 3-d Forward degrees on a spherical compass, and that could cause the OOIs to COLLIDE in different but non-opposite 3-d Forward directions;
in yet another example, two OOIs (such as TWO ATOMS) could have NON-OVERLAPPING (parallel) OADLs that are LESS THAN ONE Atomic 3-d Forward degree on a spherical compass apart (in which case we could call the OADLs RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT) with OVERLAPPING ATOMIC MASS PARTS, and as between the Atomic Mass Parts of the OOIs, there would be either 180 Atomic 3-d Forward degrees on a spherical compass *or* ZERO Atomic 3-d Forward degrees on a spherical compass, and that could cause the OOIs to COLLIDE in different but OPPOSITE *or* THE SAME 3-d Forward directions, respectively;
in yet still another example, two OOIs (such as TWO ATOMS) could have NON-OVERLAPPING (parallel) OADLs that are GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE Atomic 3-d Forward degree on a compass apart with OVERLAPPING ATOMIC MASS PARTS (we could call this a “WIDE OOI” case because ATOMS ARE COMPRISED OF TWO PARTS, WITH THE ATOMIC MASS PART BEING POSITIONALLY RELATIVE-TO THE COM PART, WHICH MEANS THAT ONE ATOM CAN OCCUPY MORE THAN ONE ATOMIC*3-d FORWARD DEGREE), and as between the Atomic Mass Parts of the OOIs, there would be either 180 Atomic 3-d Forward degrees on a spherical compass *or* ZERO Atomic 3-d Forward degrees on a spherical compass, and that could cause the OOIs to COLLIDE in different but OPPOSITE *or* THE SAME 3-d Forward directions, respectively.
But that’s a lot of words to say what can be illustrated with one simple picture!
For example, consider the picture below, and start by imagining that the COM parts of six individual ATOM OOIs (OOI1, OOI2, OOI3, OOI4, OOI5 and OOI6) are moving along their own OADLs (OADL1, OADL2, OADL3, OADL4, OADL5 and OADL6, respectively); then NOTICE that the movement of the COM part of each OOI along the OOI’s own OADL is causing the Atomic Mass part of the OOI to move in a certain 3-d Forward direction on the compass.
We see that OADL1 and OADL2 are OVERLAPPING, and they are ABSOLUTELY-COINCIDENT OADLs.
So if OOI1 and OOI2 collided (and here NOTE that all collision force is experienced by a force-struck OOI as Forward-acting force), then they would apply Forward-acting physical force to each other in different but OPPOSITE 3-d Forward directions, because OADL1 and OADL2 are separated by 180 Atomic 3-d Forward degrees.
OADL2 and OADL3 (and also OADL1 and OADL3) are NON-OVERLAPPING (parallel), separated by *greater than or equal to one* Atomic 3-d Forward degree, but FROM THE POV OF THE ATOMIC MASS PARTS of OOI2 and OOI3, they are moving in OPPOSITE 3-d Forward directions, so therefore OOI2 and OOI3 (and also OOI1 and OOI3) illustrate the WIDE OOI case.
If OOI2 and OOI3 collided, then they would apply Forward-acting physical force to each other in different but OPPOSITE 3-d Forward directions.
OADL5 and OADL6 are NON-OVERLAPPING (parallel), but separated by *less than one* Atomic 3-d Forward degree, so we would call them RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT OADLs.
If OOI5 and OOI6 collided, then they would apply Forward-acting force to each other in different but OPPOSITE 3-d Forward directions.
OADL4 and OADL1—and also OADL4 and OADL2; along with OADL4 and OADL3—are OVERLAPPING, and they are INTERSECTING OADLs.
So if OOI4 and OOI1 (or OOI4 and OOI2; or OOI4 and OOI3) collided, then they would apply Forward-acting physical force to each other in different but NON-OPPOSITE 3-d Forward directions, because they are separated by greater than or equal to one Atomic 3-d Forward degree, and their Atomic Mass Parts do not occupy opposite or identical 3-d Forward directions.
In joy, Frank