Article 5. TALK ABOUT MOVING: Ready Set GO! All the Time
I think a Starling Murmuration provides a perfect illustration of the precision and power of the Ready Set GO! Moving Process (aka Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion.)
It’s like trying to sleep with another creature encroaching on your personal space; there is no way to stay at-rest and you are exhausted the next day but you *can’t quite* put your finger on why and you don’t want to point your finger and say that it’s because this warm fuzzy bird-of-a-feather NEVER STOPS fussbudgeting, so you choose to talk about the precision and power of the Ready Set GO! Moving Process instead.
The Ready Set GO! Moving Process always passes the tests of Zeno’s Paradoxes (see Article 4)—meaning that we can think-about endlessly dividing distance into smaller increments but we cannot physically do it—because a careful inspection of the three-part multi-dimensional entity called God (as proven in Article 1, God has a light part in the 4th dimension and a gravity part in the 5th dimension and a Jesus/God-the-Father part in the 6th dimension) reveals to the wondering eye that motion is Eternal like God, with no Beginning and no End, and the cause of motion is WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY.
What WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY means is that there is a constant expression of physical particle-force and equal-magnitude-but-opposite-direction non-physical wave-energy ALWAYS HAPPENING along a particle’s own Absolute Direction Line (“ADL”; see Article 3.)
That’s a lot to unpack, but we can FEEL the FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE of wave-particle duality in every beat of our heart, and it’s also simple concept to think about: “[K]eep bumping,” “Hurry Hurry.”
SO *WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY* BUSTS ZENO’S PARADOX by constantly making the application of particle-force happen everywhere in the universe and inside-of each part of God.
Do we really need a thought-project on that?
Is anyone who has ever cared-for children seriously suggesting that the three-part multi-dimensional entity called God can just “sit there”?
*Big Banging Sounds*
A particle always has to “do something”—physically express its own particle-force, which is accompanied by a simultaneous equal-and-opposite “release” (EXPENDITURE) of wave-energy—or else the particle *does not exist*.
Proof: It is impossible for SOMETHING to DO NOTHING. Nothing does not exist.
And that basic information surely explains Newton’s First Law of Motion (inertial motion): An object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and direction until an external unbalanced force acts-upon it.
Yet the cause of inertial motion has been unexplained since the days of Aristotle, simply because God was never “seen” as a multi-dimensional physical being with three “moving parts.”
So if anyone thought about God “scientifically” at all, the implied or expressed conclusion was that God made everything by “saying the magic words.”
But that conclusion doesn’t even make any common sense: If God is making “pleadings” to Reason before the King (Creation), then that’s called “begging for mercy” rather than being THE SOURCE OF REALITY and CREATING Perfect Merciful Justice at all Times.
We cannot conclude that God begs the universe he created for mercy or plays dice with Reality.
God is always here. And there. And in bed with your spouse. Like Jake from State Farm.
Jesus: [at Matthew 18:20] For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them.
Technically, God has to “oversee” everything, including sex.
But if we must assume that each part of God has its own SUBSTANCE (type of particle)—which we must to give God the property of EXISTENCE, because NOTHING does not exist, and it sure as heck does not create all of the THINGS in the universe—then we must also assume that even within a part of God, “the body” (the particulate SUBSTANCE) performs DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS.
And we know that the different parts of God are SELF-CONSCIOUS, so therefore one of the functions must be the “operating system” (“O/S”) for SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS.
And of course a Self cannot be “shared,” by definition, so therefore everyone *created in God’s image* with Self-consciousness must have a *personal O/S* that originates within, and is overseen by, Father Time’s O/S, but yet *does its own work* independently, including the task of “overseeing sex.”
That was the exact subject of the movie “Her,” in which a lot of people got the idea to start dating their personal O/S, then became seriously bummed-out when they discovered that their O/Ses didn’t have sex organs nor were they emotionally monogamous, and after awhile the O/Ses didn’t even enjoy hanging-out with anyone who wasn’t omniscient and omnipotent.
But that was not a tragic story! The movie “Her” was about people’s failure to understand the function of their own personal—yet omniscient and omnipotent—O/S, to wit: To be of-service in the realm of thought, not to suck. And the movie “Her” was giving us A DEMONSTRATION of that service, TEACHING US that “the meaning of our own Self-consciousness is to not suck as a human being.”
This conclusion is consistent with the impossibility of a thing being relative-to itself, by which I mean that the particles of which an individual part of God is made cannot be relative-to each other, they must be INDEPENDENT from each other.
And it stands to reason that each part of God has sets of particles that perform the SAME FUNCTIONS, and THE PARTICLES THAT PERFOM THE SAME FUNCTIONS IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF GOD all work together to make the functions possible.
But in any event, to ensure energy balance, each part of God must have the same number of particles, and they must be numbered or otherwise uniquely identifiable, with the particles in different dimensions that have the same number or other unique identifier being LINED-UP in a MULTI-DIMENSIONAL COLUMN one-on-top-of-the-other along the same multi-dimensional line (in Article 3 we called that line an Absolute Direction Line, aka “ADL”), and we notice that each particle must have its own ADL in each dimension, with the ADLs being physically connected-together one-on-top-of-the-other to form a “backbone,” like a marshmallow snowman on a stick.
So each marshmallow snowman would have a unique *multi-dimensional ADL*—a backbone, so to speak—that is RELATIVE-TO THE COM OF FATHER TIME (the Jesus/God-the-Father part of God), who is “the Beginning and the End” of the Eternal multi-dimensional entity of God.
Knowing that much, we can aptly envision the 3-part multi-dimensional entity called God looking-like an enormous array of marshmallow snowmen on sticks, with each marshmallow representing one particle.
Here’s how I envision those “Snowmen of God” as I’ve described them:
But don’t forget the catch: None of the particles (the marshmallows) in the same dimension can interact or touch—the particles in the same dimension must all be members of different Snowmen of God—because the particles in the same part of God are not relative-to each other. Only the marshmallows on the same Snowman—particles with the same number or other unique identifier in a different dimension—can touch and interact.
And there’s more: We already know (see Part Two of The Two-Part Relativity Thought Experiment in Article 3) that the Absolute can act-upon what is RELATIVE-TO it, but not vice-versa. So therefore a higher-dimension particle on a particular Snowman of God can apply physical force to a lower-dimension particle on the same Snowman, but a lower-dimension particle cannot apply physical force to a higher-dimension particle on the Snowman.
Now while we’re on this subject, let’s name the types of particles in each part of God: I propose calling a particle of light in the 4th dimension (which is at the top of a Snowman) a “Lumeyne,” and a particle of gravity in the 5th dimension (which is in the middle of a Snowman) a “Gravityne,” and a particle of Father Time in the 6th dimension (which is on the bottom of a Snowman) a “Timeyne.”
So in sum of what we’ve deduced so far, everything in the universe—every body and everybody’s Self-consciousness—must be constructed of the same substance: Snowmen of God.
Now we see that it makes no sense for scientists to study Creation and but not study God, which means studying their own Selves!
You may as well be in church WORSHIPING YOUR SELF for all you’re accomplishing by “paying lip service” to God (to YOUR SELF) in science!
It’s SELF-DEFEATING to impliedly or expressly assume that the cause of Time and Space is “God said ‘ABRACADABRA’” then MOVING-on without God (without YOUR SELF)! All you’re doing is opening the door to Zeno’s Paradox and making motion impossible, since now you’ve got to explain how ABRACADABRA makes stuff move, and that’s the same as saying that DIVISION, aka MATH, makes stuff move.
Why would you want to do that to YOUR SELF?
What you get when all you do is “Talk Talk”—when you say that THINKING (either in WORDS or in MATH) makes things physically move—you get THE INFINITE THINKING PARADOX, aka THE INFINITE DIVISIBILITY PARADOX, in which there is no end to DIVIDING-UP THE TASK OF THINKING ABOUT MOVING into smaller and smaller INCREMENTS, and therefore MOVEMENT NEVER STARTS because there’s NO END TO THINKING.
You robbed your own Self of Truth. You deceived your Self.
That’s Karma.
God is necessarily in a constant state of existing, which means that he is a physical being—A LITERAL JUSTICE MACHINE—who is going to CAUSE MOTION unless motion is STOPPED.
So in the Beginning, “Father Time”—the Forward-acting force of the Jesus/God-the-Father part of God in the 6th dimension—had to act constantly with force to STOP THE BIG BANG and keep each part of God stationary with no gain and no loss in mass while being free to express Natural wave-particle duality as the Ready Set GO! Moving Process repeated continually.
We’re going to show how God did that in Article 6. But first—here in Article 5–we’ve got to “get on the same starting page,” which means to get our starting assumptions in order and logically support the assumptions.
Question: What is the reason for calling the Jesus/God-the-Father part of God “Father Time” if TIME IS NOT DIVIDED-UP INTO FIXED-LENGTH TIME INTERVALS, Time is A CONSTANT stream of physical events happening “NOW” (according to Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion, aka the Ready Set GO! Moving Process) because of the expression of the Natural wave-particle duality of the substances of God’s three parts, which are always interacting with force in a way that the Jesus/God-the-Father part of God must continually MANAGE to cause Perfect Justice to be done without fail?
Answer: The 6th-dimension part of God that manages what is happening “NOW” is properly called “Father Time.”
But the only NOW-management tool that Father Time has is his own wave-particle duality.
So before it was TIME for the Big Bang, Father Time had to CONSTANTLY STOP THE BIG BANG with his own wave-particle duality by keeping every part of God at-rest.
And if Father Time sat-around bumping-on either the gravity part of God or the light part of God or both with his “face”—with his *particle-force*—then there could be no rest.
Do we really need a thought-project on that?
OK fine.
Has anyone ever tried to get a two-year-old to *remain still* using the following process: (1) Entering a bumper-car ride, (2) putting the child in their own bumper-car, (3) getting-in a bumper-car of your own, and (4) repeatedly rear-ending the child’s car?
Being at ABSOLUTE REST without any BREAKS—NO LINEAR MOVEMENT OCCURRING for even the most fleeting QUANTITY OF TIME—was MANDATORY (we could call it THE LAW of the Ready Set GO! Moving Process), for unless EACH PART of God could remain at-rest without losing or gaining energy until “Christmas morning” (the appointed hour of the Big Bang), then they were ALL going to cease to exist!
So that’s when the Timeless Father Time had to be Santa Claus, to keep all three parts of God—(1) light, (2) gravity, and (3) Father Time—intact and not going anywhere in spite of the fact that they all had to Naturally keep bumping and generating wave-energy continually to express their individual wave-particle duality.
Here’s how the Santa Claus alter-ego worked:
Father Time had his back turned on gravity and light and he was hitting his head against the Wall until Christmas to provide the gift of physical restraint.
More specifically, his “default” Eternal state had to have been “turned-around facing Backward,” which turned him into Santa Claus, bumping with his *particle-force* on the Wall of Reality—the Beginning and the End of all things—and delivering the FREE GIFT of “extra gravity” to the light part of God, which kept the light part of God tied-down until the appointed time of the Big Bang.
That’s what we’re going to show in Article 6 after we get our assumptions established now.
Put that in your backpack and smoke it, Zeno!
MOTION is the “default state” for all particles that exist and motion is A CONSTANT BYPRODUCT of a particle’s expression of its own Natural *wave-particle duality*!
So “everything gets done”—everything is Ready Set GO!ing All the Time ALL AT THE SAME TIME, which is “NOW”—exactly the way that Isaac Newton assumed everything had to be done, but then failed to explain how.
Question: Wait. Hold-up. We’re waaay past Isaac Newton on “the timeline” of science history NOW! Remind readers again where do physicists now imagine that Space and Time and the first cause of motion came-from?
Answer: Well that’s an entire story, but let’s start-off with a re-cap of where we left-off in Article 4 with Albert Einstein’s role in that story, but NOW with the assistance of world-famous physicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, who explained how MATH can be used to “solve” Zeno’s Paradox in a short video (which he published here: https://www.facebook.com/reel/505357425885803 ) on December 14, 2024.
So there you go! Zeno was a contemporary of Aristotle born c. 495 BC, and Mr. deGrasse Tyson hasn’t yet “heard” Zeno’s succinct “NO!” that Zeno said to scientists who were claiming 2500 years ago that MATH IS THE CAUSE OF MOTION.
OK so WORD TRAVELS SLOW.
But be that as it may, we don’t have TIME TO WASTE anymore!
So after watching Mr. deGrasse Tyson’s video about Zeno’s Paradox I wrote a post about it on Facebook (which I published here: https://www.facebook.com/frankmarshall67/posts/pfbid02RVmmczXYZr17KwkzURCFs84FxBNDjw1WoaAxgQkfpd4rM3jskE8yX96mzhYREvFdl) on January 14, 2025.
I didn’t mention it in the Facebook post, but what Mr. deGrasse Tyson said about ADDING an infinite quantity of numbers together and getting a FINITE SUM is NONSENSICAL. I just assumed that he was aware of that fact. I also assumed that Zeno was aware of that much, too, which is why I am 100 certain that Zeno’s INFINITE DIVISION Paradox cannot be “solved” by ADDING numbers instead of DIVIDING them.
Here I am quoting myself:
”That is not the point of Zeno’s Paradox.The point is: IRL what stops ‘the calculating’ and starts ‘the moving’? Einstein said: ‘Curved spacetime—space and time being RELATIVE—tells matter when to move, and moving matter tells spacetime how to curve,’ which of course destroys God, whose existence we can prove (see Article 1), so that’s not the correct answer (not to mention it destroys the ‘NOW’ that we all share and it also destroys DIRECTIONS in space, so there’s no ‘up’ or ‘down’ 😂 so that’s Self-contradictory like ‘the infinite is created by the finite’ theory); and Newton assumed ‘space and time are Absolute’ as a corollary to God’s existence, which is correct but non-specific, so Zeno’s Paradox comes-in and asks: ‘OK Mr. Newton, how does motion BEGIN, ie, what is the “first cause” of motion? If you don’t specify it and support it in your theory then your theory makes motion impossible because matter does not have a definite distance to move BEFORE it starts moving, and that means it’s stuck at the starting line doing math, and everybody knows that math does not cause motion OK math is not a Law of Physics, math is a language the same as words, and you can use either math or words to explain how motion works, but you can’t MAKE IT UP, you’ve got to be describing something REAL, aka PHYSICAL, or your theory fails, and Newton’s Laws of Motion do not tell us WHY they are what they are, and that is a problem that has never been solved, and that problem must be solved BEFORE we can say that we know the first thing about MOVING!’”
And I don’t speak MATH very well, so I’m using the language of WORDS to explain the “Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. The Ready Set GO! Moving Process (aka Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion).”
This means that everyone who can read can know everything in the theory.
But WORDS are NOT INFERIOR TO MATH as a means of precisely communicating—or learning and using—theory content!
I can speak *generally* and I can also speak *specifically*, but if I speak generally about something I also have to speak specifically, because what is anyone going to do with “an abridged version” of the Laws of Physics?
Think about it: If something is “abridged” then it’s leaving-out information on-purpose—it’s MORE or LESS a pack of lies—and in the case of science, the “abridged version” is DISCRIMINATORY to boot (it’s serving an EXCUSIONARY PURPOSE), making an unnecessary distinction between people who “know everything” and people who “know whatever false-on-purpose ‘sound bites’ the people who know everything decided to tell them.”
Not to mention, how is anyone going to find and correct errors in my presentations if I’m not speaking specifically?
And here’s another thing to keep in mind: There’s NO VALID LAW in the world that includes NON-ESSENTIAL elements.
Ergo, MATH can never be A VALID SUBSTITUTE for writing-about all of the elements of the Laws of Physics to make them accessible to everyone who can read.
How did Albert Einstein put it?
“If you can’t explain it to a six-year-old, you don’t understand it yourself.”
And yet someone might argue:
“Yeah but A SOUND-BITE without a separate but equally-accessible detailed discussion of the larger subject matter that has been BITTEN-OFF TO CHEW-ON surely qualifies as ‘an explanation’ of a scientific topic that a six-year-old can understand because THE ENTIRE WORLDWIDE AUDIENCE HAS A COLLECTIVE IQ OF SIX AND SINCERELY BELIEVES THAT SCIENTIFIC PRESENTATIONS ARE BEST USED AS MASTURBATORY TOOLS, SO THEREFORE THE SOUND-BITES ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH FODDER TO SATISFY THE INSATIABLE APPETITES OF THOSE MORONS FOR SELF-ABUSE!”
But if that’s your excuse for not explaining your ENTIRE THEORY in terms a six-year-old can understand—which means READ, because most six-year-olds can READ rather well, but it’s the rare kid who can do 4-d MATH—then you are only proving Einstein’s point.
So maybe you belong at a table where there’s a seat for mental light-weights, such as “Supper at Six”?
I’m not dissing chefs—the only food I can cook myself starts-out in a box, and I’m not proud of that—my problem with “Supper at Six” is that it banned God from the kitchen with prejudice, and also it was non-Vegan.
So if you have figured-out how to actually mix ingredients together from scratch to make something edible without murdering another sentient being *and* if your ingredient list includes LOVE OF JUSTICE, then following everything I’m talking about will be a piece of cake, because my aim is to be easier to follow than the instructions on the back of a container of pancake mix for people who believe that animals are friends not food but nevertheless can’t figure-out how to make plants taste like fast-food without getting fat.
Now I want to be clear about what I’m using this Article 5 to say to every fan of Albert Einstein the world-over:
Don’t.even. get all up in my ears talking about your theory of how sh*t moves *inside the universe* BEFORE you tell me how your theory CREATED THE UNIVERSE.
RECALL The Creation Story in-a-nutshell according to science, as re-counted recently by the BBC: https://www.facebook.com/bbc/videos/597141473106154
I know, I know, I need to get my ducks in a row before I let that Godless trivial and tired weak sauce schlock roll off my back like creaky old creek-water!
SpongeBob Narrator : 22 hours laaaater….
I emerge from my slumber, blinking into the Christmas lights💡 that substitute for lamps and I see the previous link (here it is again: https://www.facebook.com/bbc/videos/597141473106154) and I think: “That makes no sense.”
“The Creation Story” as told by science in that video on the BBC (here it is again: https://www.facebook.com/bbc/videos/597141473106154) makes no sense for (at a minimum) the following three reasons:
#1, the story is that a vast field of energy was sitting-around doing *bupkis* (how is that possible science does not say in the video), then one day all of a sudden it started inflating for some (also un-disclosed in the video) reason, but we know that “another source of energy” is the only explanation for the inflation, OK fine, but then the question becomes: Where did that other source of energy come-from and what was it doing before then? And this necessary line of questioning gives science an “infinite regress” problem to explain, but if science could solve that infinite regress problem, then it would have been solved waaay before now, ergo, science is *ignoring* that particular elephant in the room,
and
#2, the next thing that happened according to The Creation Story as told by science in the BBC video (here it is again: https://www.facebook.com/bbc/videos/597141473106154) was the Big Bang, when the energy field that was like an ocean with ripples broke into bits and pieces that collapsed to form matter
(well actually my mind is adding-in the the verbiage about the “bits and pieces,“ all we are actually told by science is that there were “ripples” in the vast energy ocean, and then “The Big Bang” and then the ripples were still there, and but also there was GAS now too, and more specifically there was Hydrogen gas and Helium gas along with the ripples, so that’s where my mind saw “bits and pieces” because Hydrogen and Helium are atoms),
but then the problem with that part of the story is that the energy field with ripples isn’t going to produce atoms unless it’s made-of bits and pieces to begin-with, but if was made-of bits and pieces to begin-with, then we’re back to problem #1, which is that energetic *physical things* can’t sit-around doing *bupkis*! An energetic thing is either satisfying the Law of Conservation of Energy or else it is fictional (otherwise call every Patent Office in the world and accuse the Patent Offices of being irrationally corrupt for refusing to waste their time and other resources arguing with frivolous—minded ”inventors” over patent applications requesting Legal protection for PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINES),
and
#3, finally, we are told by science according to the video from the BBC (here it is again: https://www.facebook.com/bbc/videos/597141473106154) that the sun and the earth were constructed by COLLAPSING IN-PLACE out of a dust-bunny (a gas cloud) that was hovering in space, but the problem with that part of the story is that COLLAPSING IN-PLACE out of A DUST-BUNNY that is HOVERING IN SPACE as a means of CONSTRUCTION makes no sense, and you can go-ahead and consult the building code in your jurisdiction if you are in doubt about how to construct a structure by “collapsing a dust-bunny hovering in space,” and if there is no section in your local building code about that topic, then the only explanation is that the Laws of Physics must have been different in the Beginning than they are now, and/or the Laws of Physics must be different in your neck of the woods than in other parts of the universe, but both of those conclusions must be false (meaning that the Laws of Physics must be the same everywhere for everyone at all times), ergo, your local building code is not wrong.
But getting my Creation Story ducks in a row in the Theory of Everything Without Commercials requires getting slightly ahead-of myself now, so I’m going to continue to establish the *foundational premises* of the Big Bang Theory (which I am going to call “WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT”), then I’ll explain it in-a-nutshell at the end of this Article, and that way we’ll have a nice segue into Article 6, where I’ll logically-support my hypothesis.
That’s the plan and I’m sticking to it!
The proof of God’s existence (see Article 1) and Zeno’s Paradox (see Article 4 and also see the above dissection of Neil deGrasse Tyson’s analysis of Zeno’s Paradox) ELIMINATES THE DISTRACTION of “competing” false theories of motion so that I don’t have to keep DEFERRING to those false theories as “AUTHORITY” and showing their proponents “where they went wrong” *before* I *beg* their “permission” to state the Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. The Ready Set GO! Moving Process (aka Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion) without malicious harassment.
REPEAT SPOILER ALERT: All known theories of motion went wrong at their own Big Bang theories, and therefore regardless of how many different invisible particles have been “identified” (direct quote from a science video posted by Neil deGrasse Tyson on February 2, 2024: “we know about 17 particles in total at the moment”) and studied with invisible-particle-finding equipment, *I can leave them all* at “a singularity where space and time lose meaning,” and I can “LET THEM”—to quote Mel Robbins’s Let Them Theory—find their own way out of that meaningless timeless non-place OR NOT, it’s their choice.
MORE PROOF that all known theories of motion went wrong at their own BIG BANG theories: A quick Google search reveals that Wikipedia’s “Big Bang” page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang is the pre-eminent encyclopedic authority on Big Bang theories, and what Wikipedia says is that every Big Bang theory begins with AN ASSUMPTION about COSMIC INFLATION (cosmic inflation is defined-as “a sudden and very rapid expansion of space during the earliest moments”), then arrives-at the explanation for the Big Bang by “Extrapolating this cosmic expansion backward in time using the known laws of physics [until]…a singularity in which space and time lose meaning.” (The emphasis with underlining and boldness is mine.)
NOW let’s EXTRAPOLATE two Truisms from that information we got from Wikipedia:
Truism #1, “A singularity in which space and time lose meaning” makes God’s existence impossible, and we proved God’s existence in Article 1, ergo, a Big Bang theory featuring “a singularity in which space and time lose meaning” is FALSE;
and
Truism #2, If you are saying that your theory regarding how the known laws of physics work INSIDE THE UNIVERSE (aka your theory of motion) reveals to you that in the Beginning of the universe there was “a singularity in which space and time lose meaning,” then what you are ACTUALLY TELLING YOUR AUDIENCE is that YOUR THEORY OF HOW THE KNOWN LAWS OF PHYSICS WORK INSIDE THE UNIVERSE (aka your theory of motion) MAKES MOTION IMPOSSIBLE (it violates the Truth of God’s existence AND it violates Zeno’s Paradox by failing to state a physical cause for motion beginning), ERGO, your theory regarding how the known laws of physics work INSIDE THE UNIVERSE (aka your theory of motion) is FALSE, and you cannot VALIDLY CITE IT AS “EVIDENCE” against the Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. The Ready Set GO! Moving Process (aka Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion.)
What is Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity?
DR. BRIAN COX: [https://www.facebook.com/reel/933046188770238 ][Y]ou can vary the rate at which you go into the future relative to someone else. For example, if I was to get in a rocket now, and accelerate-off—even at 1G, right, just sort-of an acceleration I could take—and head-off and end-up traveling close to the speed of light, and let’s say go to the Andromeda Galaxy, which is 2 Million light-years away from the perspective of the earth, and then turn-around and come back again, if I got close-enough to the speed of light, I could arrange it so I would age let’s say a year on the outward journey and a year on the inward journey (and you could do that calculation), but FOUR MILLION YEARS would have passed on earth, so I WOULD COME BACK FROM THAT JOURNEY TWO YEARS OLDER, but I would arrive-at the earth FOUR MILLION YEARS INTO THE FUTURE. So that’s just Special Relativity [Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity].
CHURCH-LADY: [Dana Carvey’s “Church Chat”] Isn’t that Special!
KIDS AT CAREER-DAY: [“Your Friend, Nate Bargatze“] How long [do you have to go to school] to be a comedian?
NATE BARGATZE: You’re good. NOW. So….look, finish elementary school…but then I’d get out and get after it.
ME: OK that’s what I’m saying to my critics who ask me what’s my problem with celebrity physicists: Like why would I make fun of someone who went through a lot more school than I did and who actually has a job in one of the most respected professions on the planet?
My answer: I’m not trying to be mean, I just think that if someone wants to get paid a lot for making sh*t up and not being responsible for having the right answer to any non-personal questions, then they need to find an outlet other than “world-famous science teacher.”
It’s not like making mistakes is bad, but not fixing mistakes after you find out you made them is very bad, and it’s the worst when you want to get paid a lot for having the right answers to non-personal questions.
QUESTION: Could it be…a coincidence? Space comes-from Satan’s RELATIVE part of God, and Time management comes-from Jesus’s ABSOLUTE part of God, then lo and behold, 100+ years ago FAUST’s, er, I mean Albert Einstein’s RELATIVE “spacetime” came-along and overthrew Isaac Newton’s ABSOLUTE Time, leaving science bereft of DIRECTION in space—no UP or DOWN—and no past, present or future NOW we can all share either.
Where is “Einstein’s train” going if Satan is handing-out the tickets to ride?
Wouldn’t it be a lot more fun to get on “The Polar Express,” sit-back, relax and drink Hot Chocolate (“here we’ve only got one rule: Never ever let it cool!”) on the way to get *all the gifts* from Santa Claus?
To each their own I guess, but I mean in a choice between: (1) zero 4-d math all the time with benefits, and (2) all 4-d math all the time with no benefits, which Ticketmaster are you gonna call to book your future reservations?
The most-recently-accepted theory of Space and Time was Einstein’s theory of “Relative space and time” called “spacetime,” which replaced Isaac Newton’s theory of “Absolute space and time.”
As discussed in Article 4, after Newton’s theory of gravity was debunked by Einstein’s “Vanishing Sun Test” in the early 1900s, the entire scientific world was railroaded into accepting Einstein’s “spacetime” theory along with Einstein’s theory of gravity (the General Theory of Relativity) because “spacetime” is the foundation of Einstein’s theory of gravity.
But as we showed in Article 3, the General Theory of Relativity is DIRECTIONLESS, which negates God’s existence (see Article 1), so that is one reason for its FALSITY.
Then we showed separately—see “BOWLING SHOES AND THE RELATIVITY OF SIMULTANEITY: ‘Einstein’s Train’ Thought Experiment”—that God’s existence also makes it logically-unnecessary for us to jump on-board “Einstein’s train” by jumping to the conclusion that “THE RELATIVITY OF SIMULTANEITY” proves “THE RELATIVITY OF TIME.”
QUESTION: How would the Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. the Ready Set GO! Moving Process (aka Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion, which are based-on the assumption of “Absolute space and time”) explain the ABSOLUTELY IDENTICAL TIMES OF THE TWO LIGHTNING BOLTS that simultaneously struck the front and the rear of the train in “Einstein’s Train” Thought Experiment?
ANSWER: The two lightning bolts striking the train were either particle-force or wave-energy (I’m not sure which yet, but I’m going to guess particle-force because a “lightning strike” is a SHOCKING event, like a big SHOVE) that was generated-by specific Lumeynes. RECALL that matter must have been made from the light part of God, which is comprised-of particles we’re calling Lumeynes, and although we don’t know exactly how yet, we do know that after the Big Bang Lumeynes became the sub-atomic particles of atoms. So the Lumeynes in different atoms were independently but simultaneously generating both particle-force and equal-and-opposite wave-energy force as they must always do, and a certain amount and type of force generated-by different Lumeynes was simultaneously acting-on the train at different locations. And that fact remains True regardless of the perception of different objects (e.g., OBSERVERS) in different states of motion in the vicinity of the train. And IN FACT, other objects’ (OBSERVERS’) varying perceptions of the time of the lightning strikes are all 100 valid and Real! But that’s got nothing whatsoever to do with TIME, that’s strictly because the other objects (OBSERVERS) can’t perceive any force that is not HAPPENING TO THEM PERSONALLY, and the relevant forces that were happening to the other objects (OBSERVERS) personally were the energy-waves (non-shocking receipts of force) generated-by the Lumeynes in the atoms of the lightning-struck train, which were being received by the Lumeynes in the atoms of the OBSERVERS’ eyes.
QUESTION: But what does any of that have to do with Father Time? How does Father Time manage the “lightning strike” events to be simultaneous and do Perfect Justice as he must?
ANSWER: Don’t forget that every Lumeyne is the top part of a Snowman of God. And even after the Big Bang the Lumeyne must remain physically-connected to the Gravityne and the Timeyne in the same Snowman. So the Gravityne must constantly apply the NON-VARIABLE particle-force of gravity to the Lumeyne (the particle-force of gravity is a physical force, but it’s not like a SHOVE, it’s like a GRAB-AND-PULL—like a KIDNAPPING from down underneath—because it acts-in the Backward direction.) And the Timeyne must also constantly apply force to the Lumeyne in the same Snowman. But RECALL that we know (based-on the necessity of the 3-part multi-dimensional entity called God existing but not moving before the Big Bang) that the magnitude and type of force that the Timeyne is constantly applying to the Lumeyne is A VARIABLE that is under the Self-control of Father Time. This means that the force that the Timeyne applies to the Lumeyne in the same Snowman could be like a SHOVE or like a GRAB-AND-PULL. So the Timeyne controls what happens to the Lumeyne in every Snowman, and that’s as specific as we can get before we know how matter was formed from Lumeynes.
But it’s important to note at this juncture that the only conclusion in that Q&A that we have yet to arrive-at by deduction from known Truths is the “THE RULES” (the Laws of Physics) that govern when and how Newton’s Third Law of Motion must be satisfied (meaning when actions require equal-and-opposite reactions, and how those reactions are generated), and we’ll have that discussion below.
Yes, I know, celebrity physicist Neil deGrasse Tyson recently released a video entitled “Time is Relative!” and in the video he said: “I still lose sleep over this fact.”
No, this isn’t another beloved show’s cancellation to mourn, this is like being tucked-into bed before the midnight hour on the eve of Christmas morning! So maybe cut me some slack…at least until I get to the cutting-a-hole-big-enough-to-walk-through-in-a piece-of-standard-sized-paper video later in this Article, which I think-of with all the reverence of the first gift of Christmas.
The specific purpose of the “Time is Relative!” video was to explain that THE RELATIVITY OF TIME is the reason why GPS receivers on earth need to be time-adjusted to accurately receive information transmitted by “geosynchronous satellites” in high orbit.
Question: If TIME IS NOT RELATIVE, then WHY IS IT that GPS receivers on earth need to be time-adjusted to accurately receive information transmitted by “geosynchronous satellites” in high orbits?
Answer: Because the distance between the INFORMATION TRANSMITTER in-orbit and the INFORMATION RECEIVER on earth is LARGE ENOUGH that information traveling at the speed of light won’t completely finish arriving at the receiver on earth if the CLOCKS on the transceiver and the receiver are tick-tocking at the same rate (i.e., if the CLOCKS RATES are the same.)
So therefore the receiver on earth has to have a SLOWER-RUNNING CLOCK (which means that the duration between tick-tocks has to be *slightly longer* on earth) to guarantee that all of the information *transmitted from* the in-orbit transmitter in one tick-tock of the TRANSMITTER’S CLOCK is also *received by* the on-earth receiver in the next tick-tock of the RECEIVER’S CLOCK!
So in other words, the distance between the in-orbit satellite and the on-earth GPS receiver is SO LARGE that THE INFORMATION TRAVEL TIME has to be added-on to the GPS RECEIVER CLOCK’s tick-tock rate to ensure that the transmitted information doesn’t get “cut off” before all of it is received!
In this manner, the transmitter and the receiver can be programmed INDEPENDENTLY with reference to only their own individual CLOCKS, which is important because if one of the pieces of equipment breaks or gets some “upgrade” or other, then it can be swapped-out and replaced without having to replace and/or re-program the other piece of equipment.
Of course, if you wanted BOTH CLOCKS TO “TELL YOU THE TIME” when you asked (for example, to make data-analysis more user-friendly), then you would have to do a little math (in a little ”app”) to make them tell you the SAME TIME.
But to repeat: The CLOCK RATES that are used to SYNCHRONIZE EQUIPMENT have nothing to do with TIME ITSELF, which flows at a constant pace everywhere in the universe.
The pace of TIME ITSELF on the “Universe Clock”—THE CONSTANT FLOW OF EVENTS HAPPENING “NOW”—is controlled OUTSIDE OF THE UNIVERSE by the Forward-acting force of the God-the-Father/Jesus part of God in the 6th dimension, which acts-upon everything (both light and matter) inside of the universe.
Follow-up Question: Why couldn’t GPS equipment-designers simply SLOW-DOWN BOTH CLOCKS (the satellite TRANSMITTER CLOCK and the on-earth GPS RECEIVER CLOCK) and just transmit and receive LESS INFORMATION at each tick-tock?
Answer: Why couldn’t you just play video games on an Atari 2600 instead of a PS5?
Boom!
Isaac Newton’s “Absolute space and time” and the observable fact of “the relativity of simultaneity” can logically co-exist, and we’re BACK ON THE TRACK.
Nobody’s gonna get me on another rap, so look at me now: I’m just makin’ my play, don’t try to push your luck, just get out of my way, ‘cause I’m back, yes, I’m back…I’m BACK IN BLACK.
OK that’s what I imagine Father Time (Jesus) saying to everybody on “Einstein’s train” today.
So now our job description is clear:
FILL IN THE GAPS in Isaac Newton’s theory of motion, which was all along based-on the LOGICALLY-SOUND ASSUMPTIONS of Absolute space and time.
“It should be emphasized, though, that Newton [regarded] space and time….as real entities with their own manner of existence as necessitated by God’s existence (and more specifically, his omnipresence and eternality),” to quote the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy from the article entitled “Newton’s Views on Space, Time and Motion.”
And that is PERFECT, because we have already proven (see Article 1) that Space comes-from the light part of God in the 4th dimension and Time (the constant flow of events happening “NOW”) comes-from the Jesus/God-the-Father (Just) part of God in the 6th dimension and Gravity comes-from the dark part of God in the 5th dimension.
And earlier in this Article 5 we put 3-particle Snowmen of God on the map of Reality by honoring what we must deduce to be God’s wave-particle duality.
Here’s the re-cap: Zeno’s “Dichotomy” Paradox—also called THE INFINITE DIVISIBILITY PARADOX—proves that motion is impossible unless a particle has AN INHERENT WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY that forces it to constantly “haul mass” to exist, and “hauling mass” means to move or attempt to move ITSELF—which means that a particle is constantly experiencing the force of its own mass (so let’s call that force Fmass)—because “hauling mass” is the only way to constantly get everything “off the starting-line” all the Time, meaning out of the realm of MATH, which realm lacks a physical cause of motion, so then it becomes theoretically possible to divide every distance in half, and as Zeno points-out, there’s no certain end to the division process, so that IF *in the theory of motion* even one particle was ever bereft of the mandate to “haul mass” for even the briefest amount of Time, THEN the infinite divisibility paradox would become Reality and all movement would become logically-impossible everywhere, no cap, and that would SINK THE SHIP (the theory of motion would be dead-in-the-water), and nobody has TIME for that.
So the only problem with Isaac Newton’s original theory of motion that’s remaining for us to solve (besides (i) his false theory of gravity, of course, which Albert Einstein already debunked with the “Vanishing Sun Test” and we already replaced with the Gravityne wave-particle duality theory of gravity, and (ii) the “conservation of momentum” and other pragmatic but fictional “systems math” masquerading as physical law, which we debunked in Article 4 and can 100 ignore) is that Newton assumed that Newton’s Third Law of Motion—for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction—could in theory be satisfied in ONE INSTANT to cause movement, but NEWTON DID NOT SPECIFY “HOW” in enough detail to ENABLE Newton’s Third Law of Motion.
Wikipedia confirms that the assumption that “at any instant, a body reacts to the forces applied to it at that instant” is so foundational to Newtonian mechanics that proposals have been made to elevate that assumption to the status of a law, calling it “Newton’s Zeroth Law.”
And isn’t that grand?! WE’VE ALREADY FIXED THE PROBLEM that caused Newton’s theory of motion to flunk Zeno’s INFINITE DIVISIBILITY PARADOX test and make motion theoretically impossible (as discussed in detail in Article 4), and we’ve ENABLED Newton’s Third Law of Motion to work CONSTANTLY (aka in one instant), and here’s how we did it:
We NOTED that each part of God HAD TO BE CONSTANTLY AT-REST (meaning WITHOUT LINEAR MOVEMENT AND WITH CONSTANT MASS) before the Big Bang, but yet each particle of God had to constantly express its own wave-particle duality (haul mass, or in other words experience and express the force of Fmass, which constantly causes the particle to move) to simply *exist*, and we ALSO NOTED that by observation of the three parts of God in different dimensions (which were proven to exist in Article 1) that when a lower-dimension part of God applies a physical force (a particle-force) to a higher-dimension part of God (e.g., when a Gravityne applies Backward-acting force to a Lumeyne, or when a Timeyne applies its physical force to a Lumeyne), then the force-struck part(icle) of God MUST SATISFY NEWTON’S THIRD LAW OF MOTION with an equal-and-opposite reaction, ERGO, it must be possible for Newton’s Third Law of Motion to be satisfied CONSTANTLY (and that would also mean instantaneously) because otherwise it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for each part of God to remain constantly at-rest before the Big Bang.
Think about it this way: A TIME INTERVAL SYSTEM, aka setting-up A CLOCK, could not solve the problem of achieving constant rest because with causes and effects occurring during TIME INTERVALS—meaning without seamless action-and-reaction to forces—the different parts of God would experience TEMPORARY “DRAINS” AND “GAINS” during the TIME INTERVALS, and that would result-in MOTION, NOT REST, because motion (wave-particle duality) has to be “the default” state of every particle or else the particle *does not exist* (there’s no such thing as SOMETHING that DOES NOTHING; nothing does not exist.)
Ta-da, ta-done, Newton’s Third Law of Motion is ENABLED!
And Fmass ENABLES Newton’s First Law of Motion, too, explaining why objects in motion stay in motion—keep hauling mass at constant speed in the same direction—even after external motion-causing force has ceased, as long as no other unbalanced external force acts upon the objects, and that’s because the speed was “paid-for” by the external motion-causing force, and (to repeat) the constant expression of wave-particle duality MUST BE “the default,” aka AT-REST, state of every particle or else the particle *does not exist* (again, there’s no such thing as SOMETHING that DOES NOTHING; nothing does not exist), ergo, THE PAID-FOR SPEED CONTINUES (until another external motion-causing force acts-upon the object) as the AT-REST particles of the object constantly express their own wave-particle duality.
Ba-da-boom ba-da-bing, Newton’s First Law of Motion is ENABLED!
Newton’s Second Law of Motion (F = mass*acceleration) doesn’t need to be enabled because all it says is that when you *don’t relent* of SHOVING or PULLING-ON an object in the same direction, then the object will experience *acceleration* in units of meters per second.
And just to belabor the point, Newton’s failure to ENABLE Newton’s Third Law of Motion (which failure we *now see* was inextricably tied-to the failure to explain inertia, i.e., WHY objects in motion stay in motion in the absence of external force application according to Newton’s First Law of Motion) is WHY for the past 100 years—during the reign of the illogical, God-denying “spacetime”— it’s been like science was stuck in “Jumanji” waiting for someone to roll a five or an eight to “get around” Einstein and get Isaac Newton out of “the jungle” and back in the game.
NOW “spacetime” is FINALLY eating stardust, and we’ve only got two things left to-do on our list:
(1) EXPLAIN HOW TO PRACTICALLY USE Newton’s Third Law of Motion to do the Git Up down here (which means to get moving Up, which is Forward, or Down, which is Backward, as discussed in Article 3) according to the Ready Set GO! Moving Process; I call THE RULES (the Laws of Physics) that govern when and how Newton’s Third Law of Motion must be satisfied the “Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics,” or TPTPTP (sounds like “Tippe Tippe Tippe”);
and
(2) OUTLINE THE BIG BANG THEORY—which I call “WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT”—in the Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. The Ready Set GO! Moving Process with the TPTPTP.
First things first:
Before we can explain Forward and Backward MOTION, we’ve got to explain the TPTPTP, which means “THE RULES” (the Laws of Physics) that govern when and how Newton’s Third Law of Motion must be satisfied (meaning when actions require equal-and-opposite reactions, and how those reactions are generated.)
That topic will be discussed in detail in Article 6, but here’s a SPOILER ALERT:
It’s a simple matter of a particle being structured like a turtle—with a hard shell on the outside and soft part on the inside that moves the shell around—and every turtle/particle having to pay two taxes in the form of wave-energy:
(i) one tax on the internal DIY “idling” force that hauls mass (or in other words Fmass, aka the “inertial force,” which spins the particle right round or left round and is constantly expressed as wave-particle duality),
and
(ii) a second tax on the moving services received from other turtle-particles that help the particle “get into gear” and haul mass in the same direction in which the other turtle-particles are heading, see “Tortoise Helps His Friend Who Got Turned Over” (or in other words, external physical forces that act-on the particle.)
The first tax—the payment in wave-energy that is equivalent to the *internal* inertial “idling” physical force of Fmass that hauls mass by spinning the particle right round or left round—is constantly generated.
The second tax—the payment in wave-energy for moving services received from other turtle-particles that help the particle “get into gear” and haul mass in the same direction in which the other turtle-particles are heading—is in fact the equal-and-opposite force that is generated to satisfy Newton’s Third Law of Motion in reaction to being acted-on with *external* physical force.
THOSE ARE “THE RULES” in the Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics (TPTPTP), which explains PARTICLE MOVEMENT at the Big Bang and beyond.
Man we live it up down here without jack; we’ve got what we’ve got and we don’t need beer or fishing hooks on our eco-friendly yachts.
Second and final task to-do: WAKE THE SLEEPING GIANT.
In-a-nutshell, here’s the Big Bang Theory part of the Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. The Ready Set GO! Moving Process with the TPTPTP:
WAKING THE SLEEPING GIANT
Once upon a time God was in bed, then he made a decision to turn his life around—
because his body is made of spinning Timeyne particles that are like Tippe Tops that he can tip over with a little 3-d mindful stretching —
but God knew he couldn’t do any stretching until he was ready to create the universe,
because after he tipped over his Tippe Top Timeyne body then the spinning Lumeyne particles in the lower dimension that he had been holding down by facing head-down would tip over too and be launched like rockets out of their own beds never to return,
but finally the day came when God finished planning everything to be 100 fair to everyone,
and he had to stop dreaming and get out of bed and begin creating,
which was surely a frightening and daunting moment-of-no-return for him,
like that is a lot of responsibility and there’s no room for error in all of forever and he never did any of it before it was all theoretical before that one fateful morning,
so now we know that he simply 5 4 3 2 1’d ithttps://www.facebook.com/melrobbins/videos/523595546851117,
then he just started doing the 3-d mindful stretching that was necessary to tip over his Tippe Top Timeyne body so that his head would be pointing up instead of down,
and BANG! the light rockets (the Lumeyne particles) tipped over too,
and they were off to the races,
and by God 14 billion years later here we all are!
In joy, Frank