Article 7. SHALL WE PLAY A GAME? Parks and Re-Creation of the Universe: Test-Driving Tippe Top Light Particles in Space With the Unlicensed Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics Tetris Program Totally on Paper (TPTPTPTPTOP)

CHECK-LIST. 

COM control to Major Elon!

Is this not a Space Oddity?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iYYRH4apXDo

Check ignition and may God’s love be with you….

Five, Four, Three, Two, One, Lift off….

Now it’s time to leave the capsule if you dare

Don’t worry, this is not a DEMOLITION DERBY—there will be ZERO COLLISIONS in this Article—and if my non-stop CAPS LOCKING is driving you mad, then try to understand that it’s like a regional dialect: I can’t help it that’s just my writing voice! 

But if you hate my voice that much then you might need more practice driving while coveting thy neighbor’s carcass, and if that’s the case then might I suggest going to Hell, Michigan and enrolling in “Midwest Winter Driving School” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYPmApA1CVs ?

The way I figure it, we’re on the figurative “Polar Express” to the North Pole—figuring-out the fundamental Laws of Physics governing everything from the Big Bang to magnetism is the goal (with chemistry and biology at the outer limits)—and I’m sure nobody’s going to get chucked off the train of thought.

Everybody has the right to level-up for personal development, it’s WARGAMES 101 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIh41wZEd5c, and I’m talking smack in God’s control room. 

But I’m also assuming that anybody who’s on-board has evolved past the stage of salivating at the sight of wildlife. 

WHERE WERE WE?

BEFORE NOW, we proved that a lone light particle (a Lumeyne) in Space will always be moving at the speed of light according to Newton’s First Law of Motion for Lumeynes, E = c (see Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20), which is derived from F = mv, where m = 1 electromagnetic wave-energy and v = c.

We also showed in Article 6 that the Ready state of all post-Big-Bang Lumeynes (let’s call post-Big-Bang Lumeynes “Loose Lumeynes,” or “LL”s)—that is to say, the major “life-change” that happened to the LLs immediately BEFORE NOW—is going from being tipped UPSIDE-DOWN, or “UD,” to being tipped UPSIDE-UP, or “UU,” then upon finding themselves Set UU *and* heading in the 4-d Forward direction, the LLs began to GO! at the speed of light in the 4-d Forward direction (again see Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20.)

So that’s where we’re going to START this series of SEVEN TEST-DRIVES.

TEST-DRIVE 1: 

Figure-out what will happen if Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching (see Article 6, STEP 13, Feature (ii)) causes the ADL of a Timeyne (“TM”) in a given Snowman of God to tilt and the TM to tip UD with the ADL aligned along the Backbone of the Snowman *after* the LL from the same Snowman starts moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the speed of light at a Big Bang event, *assuming* that the 3-d Mindful Stretching ceases (there is no more tilting of the TM’s ADL) after the TM tips UD? 

TEST-DRIVE 1 RESULTS: 

The LL will simultaneously tip UD, too, then end-up moving “in reverse gear” at the speed of light, because FfSet = -Ft (see Article 6, STEP 11C.)

QUESTION: But will the LL be moving Backward along the same line along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event? 

RECALL that the line along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event was the ADL defining the Backbone of the Snowman of God (let’s call that the “ADL Backbone,” and let’s call the TM’s UD or UU orientation along the ADL Backbone the “ADL Backbone Orientation.”) 

ANSWER: No. The line along which the LL is moving when it tips UD will not be the same as the ADL Backbone along which the LL began moving in the 4-d Forward direction at the Big Bang event. 

This is because NOW the LL’s LATERAL MOVEMENT IS NOT CONSTRAINED like it was when the Lumeyne was “asleep” within the Snowman of God BEFORE THE BIG BANG EVENT. Now Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching, which is causing the LL to tip UD, will also cause the LL to move laterally in the 3-d direction of the 3-d Mindful Stretching WHILE THE STRETCHING IS HAPPENING. 

This means that the LL will have some non-zero distance (like a “turn radius”) that it will have to move in EVERY 3-d Forward direction between its fully UU position and its fully UD position.

We can think-of the LL as having A SPHERICAL COMPASS—let’s call it an LL PARTICLE COMPASS—around it with *3-d Forward directions* being DEGREES on the compass, with one 3-d Forward degree on the compass being the same width as the LL.

So therefore the LL won’t end-up moving in the 5-d Backward direction along the ADL Backbone, it will end-up moving along A DIFFERENT LINE than the ADL Backbone (let’s call an LL’s line of movement a “Loose ADL,” or an “LADL.”)

And in fact, the LL will have to move in a 3-d Forward direction that approximates, but is RELATIVE-TO, the 5-d Backward direction along the ADL Backbone, because the LL is not “on” the ADL Backbone anymore!

So let’s say that the LL will have a “3-d Backbone Orientation,” and it will be moving in the “3-d Down” direction along the LADL (versus moving in the “3-d Up” direction along the LADL.) 

NOTE that both the 3-d Down direction along the LADL and the 3-d Up direction along the LADL are 3-d Forward directions, and RECALL (see Article 3) that all 3-d Forward directions are RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER and RELATIVE-TO both the 4-d Forward direction and the 5-d Backward direction.

But that’s not a problem, because the ADL Backbones of the Snowmen of God are all RELATIVE-TO the 6-COM of Father Time (see Article 5 and Article 6, STEP 13, Feature (i)), which means that the ADL Backbones are all RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER. 

So therefore *after* an LL leaves its Snowman of God and changes direction because of Father Time’s additional 3-d Mindful Stretching, which causes the LL to have an LADL that is different than the Snowman’s ADL Backbone, then the LADL will be RELATIVE-TO the ADL Backbone of the Snowman of God from which the LL came. 

This means that LADLs are ALL RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER—or in other words, there is MUTUAL-RELATIVITY between LADLs—even though the LLs themselves are NOT RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER.

LLs are never acting relative-to each other, they are always acting relative-to the TM in their Snowman (and relative-to the Gravityne, too, but the Gravityne is a constant, not a variable, experienced by the LL.) It is LLs acting relative-to the TM in their Snowman that causes LADLs (which are, in fact, relative-to each other) to get into POSITIONS where the LLs can INDIRECTLY apply force to each other VIA THE LADLs. This is because no two LLs can occupy the same POSITION in Space, even if their LADLs are Absolutely Coincident, so therefore the LLs will perceive the forces from other LLs as *external* forces!  

THAT’S HOW AND WHY THERE IS *EFFECTIVELY* MUTUAL-RELATIVITY BETWEEN LLs even though *ACTUALLY* there is NO RELATIVITY BETWEEN LLs!

Boom!

We have explained why the light particle “entanglement” problem that Quantum Physics can’t solve is not a problem in the Theory of Everything Without Commercials! 

Here RECALL the explanation of the light particle “entanglement” problem from Article 4: 

The Theory of Everything Without Commercials ft. The Ready Set GO! Moving Process (Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion) with the Tax-Paying Turtle Particle Theory of Physics (TPTPTP) is not causing the Absolute (the light part of God comprising Lumeyne particles) to become relative-to itself.

There is no logical or physical problem with MUTUALLY-RELATIVE LADLs serving as an INDIRECT MEANS of force-exchanges between LLs, which are not and can never be DIRECTLY relative-to each other in the way that Quantum Physics illogically concludes that PHOTONS become relative-to each other via “photon entanglement.” 

To repeat the difference between “photon entanglement” and “LL force indirection” made possible by mutually-relative LADLs: LLs didn’t get into Space and GET LADLs BY THEMSELVES, i.e., by “ORGANIZING THEMSELVES” RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER like photons are said to do.

NO! 

AN LL DOESN’T DO ANYTHING THAT ISN’T UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE TM to which the LL is RELATIVE. 

And so if LLs end-up applying force to each other, then *that’s not their fault*—THEY COULD NEVER BE *THE CAUSE* OF THAT HAPPENING—so that’s *effective* mutual-relativity not *actual* mutual-relativity, and it’s A TOTALLY DIFFERENT PHENOMENON THAN “ENTANGLEMENT,” which is said to be a Natural characteristic or behavior of photons.

And WE ARE NOT EVEN “FUDGING” OR “CHEATING” ON THE DEFINITIONS OF ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE ONE BIT—THIS IS NOT HYPOCRISY—BECAUSE LLs ARE NOT IN A “DEMOCRACY,” meaning that THERE IS ZERO LL “SELF-GOVERNANCE”!

Again: LLs did not *cause* even one of their countless predicaments that we call MATTER, because an LL can’t do anything that the TM to which it is permanently relative did not do first. 

TEST-DRIVE 2: 

Demonstrate how Father Time “drives” LLs.

TEST-DRIVE 2 RESULTS:

Discussion and diagrams will serve the demonstration purpose.

Exactly as we can think-of an LL as having A SPHERICAL COMPASS around it (which we’re calling an LL PARTICLE COMPASS), with 3-d directions being DEGREES on the compass having the same width as the LL, we can also think-of a Timeyne, or TM, as having A SPHERICAL COMPASS around it—let’s call it a “TM PARTICLE COMPASS”—with 3-d directions being DEGREES on the compass having the same width as the TM, and a TM has the same width as an LL, of course.

The difference between a TM SPHERICAL COMPASS and an LL SPHERICAL COMPASS is that when a TM is in the ADL Backbone Orientation, then the ADL is pointing “UP” in the 4-d Forward direction and pointing “DOWN” in the 5-d Backward direction, whereas when an LL is in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, then the LADL is pointing “UP” in the 3-d UP direction and pointing “DOWN” in the 3-d DOWN direction. 

The significance of the difference is that the 3-d UP direction and the 3-d DOWN direction on the LADL are mutually-relative, unlike the 4-d Forward direction and the 5-d Backward direction on the ADL, where the 4-d Forward direction is relative-to the Backward direction but not vice-versa. 

In the exemplary photo/diagram of two TM PARTICLE COMPASSES below, specifically NOTE the following three things:

(1) the 3-d compass degrees, 

and 

(2) the 3-d orientation of the head of the TM turtle-particles in terms of compass degrees,

and

(3) the labels I added to the photos by hand;

the other items you see inside of the transparent compass window (the compass needle and the indicators that are NOT hand-drawn) are not relevant to the illustration, they are permanent parts of my personal hand-held analog compass.

NOTICE that the TM’s head (the particle top) is always pointing and applying the particle-force, Ft, along the ADL.

ALSO NOTICE that the wave-energy, Et, of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction as Ft is always being emitted at the particle bottom along the ADL. 

The ADL always runs along the TM’s midline between the particle top and the particle bottom. 

“N” and “S” on the compass roughly correspond to the 4-d Forward direction and the 5-d Backward direction, respectively, on the ADL Backbone. 

When an UPSIDE-UP, or “UU,” TM (shown on the left in the photo/diagram) is in the ADL Backbone Orientation, then the particle top would be pointing toward “N” on the TM PARTICLE COMPASS.  

So looking-at the TM shown on the left in the photo/diagram, we see that Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching is causing the UU TM to apply its particle-force, Ft, from the particle top in a certain 3-d Forward direction (310 degrees) on the compass.

When an UPSIDE-DOWN, or “UD,” TM (shown on the right in the photo/diagram) is in the ADL Backbone Orientation, then the particle top would be pointing toward “S” on the TM PARTICLE COMPASS.  

So looking-at the TM shown on the right in the photo/diagram, we see that Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching is causing the UD TM to apply its particle-force, Ft, from the particle top in a certain 3-d Forward direction (130 degrees) on the compass. 

But the only thing that would appear inside of the universe would be the “front office” view of an LL’s “force scene” in its own Snowman of God. 

And we know that there are only two possible “force scenes” that any LL can have: (1) the force scene of the Lumeyne in THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram (see Article 6, STEP 10), if the TM and the LL are UD, OR (2) the force scene of the Lumeyne in the THE BIG BANG diagram (see Article 6, STEP 18), if the TM and the LL are UU. And of course the LL will be moving in response to the orientation of the TM SPHERICAL COMPASS, as determined by Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching, if any.

So if we examined the LLs in the same Snowmen as the TMs in the exemplary photo/diagram of the two TM PARTICLE COMPASSES, above, then we would see the UU LL applying its particle-force, FfSet, along the LADL in the same 3-d Forward direction (130 degrees) in which the TM is applying Ft, and we would see the UD LL applying its particle-force, FfSet, along the LADL in the same 3-d Forward direction (310 degrees) in which the TM is applying Ft.

The End of TEST-DRIVE 2!

TEST-DRIVE 3: 

Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs to move at different points along the same line of non-zero slope, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line. 

TEST-DRIVE 3 RESULTS: 

It would be similar to playing TETRIS!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BLM1naCfME

FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN SPACE that needed to be aligned.   

SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to put the LLs on a HEAD-ON COLLISION COURSE by orienting the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES to *different degrees 180-degrees apart* (opposite 3-d directions) along the line defined by the LADLs (with the 3-d UP direction on one LADL overlapping and Absolutely Coincident with the 3-d DOWN direction on the other LADL.)

So the force scene is always going to be one TM/LL UU and one TM/LL UD!

Then if one of the TMs was turned-around 180 degrees, the result would be ONE LL FOLLOWING THE OTHER ALONG THE SAME LINE of non-zero slope, with both LLs being UU or both LLs being UD.

And if both TMs were turned-around 180 degrees, the result would be THE LLs MOVING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SAME LINE of non-zero slope.

Also see the photo illustrations in TEST-DRIVE 2. 

QUESTION: Is it possible to get two UU LLs or two UD LLs head-to-head on a line of non-zero slope? 

ANSWER: No. This is because to be head-to-head means that the LLs are moving toward the same point, and all lines of non-zero slope in 3-d that meet at the same 3-d point are either IN-FRONT-OF THE POINT *or* they are BEHIND THE POINT, and no two LLs can occupy the same position (the same point), ergo, given two LLs on a line of non-zero slope, one LL will always be UU and one LL will always be UD when they are both heading toward the same point.  

TEST-DRIVE 4: 

Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs to move at different points along the same zero-slope line, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line.

TEST-DRIVE 4 RESULTS: 

It would be similar to playing TETRIS!

PART A. Assume that it’s fine if one LL ends-up UU and the other LL ends-up UD along the zero-slope line. If it’s necessary for both LLs to end-up UU or both LLs to end-up UD, then skip to PART B, below.

PART A FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN SPACE that needed to be aligned. 

PART A SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Forward-most LL into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation. 

PART A THIRD STEP, Father Time would tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Backward-most LL into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation. 

PART A FOURTH STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs, until both LLs were positioned along the same ZERO-SLOPE LINE. 

PART A FIFTH STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to put the LLs on a HEAD-ON COLLISION COURSE by orienting the TM PARTICLE COMPASSES to *different degrees 180-degrees apart* (opposite 3-d directions) along the line defined by the LADLs (with the 3-d UP direction on one LADL overlapping and Absolutely Coincident with the 3-d DOWN direction on the other LADL), so that they could apply forces to each other.

NOTE that the LLs are starting on the same zero-slope line and they would both have the same turn-radius (see TEST-DRIVE 1), because they are starting their turns and ending their turns in opposite 3-d directions. 

This means that the LLs will end-up facing each other along the same zero-slope line. 

And *I think* that the line the LLs end-up facing each other along would be the original line along which they began their turns, because at the beginning of their turns they had to go “over the starting line,” but then the turning process “re-TURNED” them to the starting line!  

So now if one of the LLs was turned-around 180 degrees, then the result would be ONE LL FOLLOWING THE OTHER along the same zero-slope line. 

And if both LLs were turned-around 180 degrees, then the result would be THE LLs MOVING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ALONG THE SAME ZERO-SLOPE LINE. 

PART B. Assume that both LLs need to end-up UU or both LLs need to end-up UD along the same zero-slope line. 

PART B FIRST STEP, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN SPACE that needed to be aligned.  

PART B SECOND STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to tip the TMs in the same Snowmen as the LLs into either (a) the UD ADL Backbone Orientation OR (b) the UU ADL Backbone Orientation.

If Father Time selected (a) and tipped the TMs into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, then the LLs would simultaneously tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation.

If Father Time selected (b) and tipped the TMs into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, then the LLs would simultaneously tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation.     

PART B THIRD STEP, when the leading LL reached the desired zero-slope line, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching of the TM in the same Snowman to cause the leading LL to move in either direction along the desired line—perhaps changing direction along the line periodically—which would be like causing the leading LL to *wait* for the following LL to catch-up. 

PART B FOURTH STEP, when the following LL reached the desired zero-slope line, then Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching of the TMs to orient the LLs head-to-head along the line, and they would automatically move toward each other. 

Optionally, 3-d Mindful Stretching could be continued, turning both TMs around 180 degrees, to get the LLs into a tail-to-tail position. 

The End of TEST-DRIVE 4!

TEST-DRIVE 5: 

Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, one-on-top-of-the-other, to move at different points along the same line, so that their LADLs would overlap and be Absolutely Coincident along the line. 

TEST-DRIVE 5 RESULTS: 

No. Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in 3-d anymore!

The Upside Down in “Stranger Things” is not a science-fiction concept! 

After the Lumeyne in a given Snowman of God experiences a Big Bang event, then the TM is NOT IN THE SAME PLACE as the Lumeyne anymore (the Lumeyne is now a “Loose Lumeyne,” or LL.)

But the higher dimensions can reach-out and touch LLs wherever they are, and that’s how OMNIPRESENCE AND OMNIPOTENCE works. 

Yet the higher dimensions don’t contain any 3-d things (any LLs) at all—the 5th and 6th dimensions are solely comprised-of particles and their gooey stretching twisting COM Segments and COM Tongues.  

For the purpose of TEST-DRIVE 5, however, we just have to REMEMBER that it always was impossible for any pre-Big-Bang Lumeyne in any Snowman of God to “visit” a different Lumeyne in a different Snowman of God, because every particle in every Snowman of God lives-along the same ADL Backbone, and the ADL Backbone has a UNIQUE POSITION that is relative-to the COM of the 6th dimension. 

So therefore when an LL is in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, it would be impossible for the LL’s LADL, which is relative-to the ADL Backbone of its own Snowman, to become Absolutely Coincident with any other ADL Backbone—or any other LADL!—except-for the ADL of its own Snowman. 

This means that no two LLs can ever have Absolutely Coincident LADLs in the 3-d Backbone Orientation. 

QUESTION: Can we at least say that when a lone LL is in the 3-d Backbone Orientation (which happens when Father Time is not doing any 3-d Mindful Stretching of the TM), then the LADL *must be* IN-BETWEEN TWO ADL Backbones if it is not bang-on its own Snowman’s ADL Backbone?

ANSWER: Yes, we can say that for certain!

Even more specifically, we can say that there is *an offset less than one particle-width* (less than one 3-d Forward degree) between LADLs when two LLs are in the 3-d Backbone Orientation one-on-top-of-the-other!

This is because when an LL is being told by the TM to “track” with the ADL Backbone, then there is always going to be a new ADL Backbone at the “width” of one Lumeyne, so therefore the LADLs of two LLs that are positioned one-on-top-of-the-other IN-BETWEEN the same two ADL Backbones will always be separated by GREATER THAN ZERO BUT LESS THAN ONE ATOMIC 3-d FORWARD DEGREE.

In that situation, LLs will apply forces to each other’s BODIES along their LADLs, but their bodies will be “struck” by each other’s forces at some *offset* from the *LL midline* (defined by the LADL)—let’s call it an “LL LADL Offset,” or “LLOff”—because their LADLs are not Absolutely Coincident, they are what we call Relatively Coincident.

Boom!

We have PROVEN that an LL is 100% in 3-d!

And every atom must be comprised-of LLs, so therefore every atom must also be 100% in 3-d.

Even the center-of-mass, or COM (the Positionally Absolute Part), of an atom must be in 3-d! 

Here RECALL from Article 3 that objects comprised-of particles (for example, atoms) can be generically referred-to as “objects-of-interest,” or OOIs. 

All OOIs have their own center-of-mass, or COM, which is the Backward-most part of the OOI, and the rest of the OOI is positionally RELATIVE-TO the COM because the COM is BLOCKING THE BACKWARD PATH of the rest of the OOI. 

The COM of an OOI moves along an Absolute Direction Line—called an OADL—which is analogous to an LL’s LADL, with the OADL being determined in an as-yet unknown manner based-on the constituent LADLs of the LLs comprising the OOI. 

QUESTION: If LLs are light particles, and they are in 3-d, and atoms are made-from LLs, then how does 4-d light remain behind an atom?

ANSWER: The 4-d COM Segment of every LL remains in the Snowman of God, and the LL remains connected to the 4-d COM Segment via an integral COM Tongue (see Article 6, STEP 13, Feature (i)).

QUESTION: Ummm yeah but as noted, the 4-d COM Tongue is integral with the 4-d COM Segment *and* the LL particle bottom—the 4-d COM Tongue acts-like a bridge between the 4-d COM Segment in the Snowman of God and the 3-d LL in Space—so why don’t we see the 4-d COM Tongues in 3-d along with the LLs that form matter? 

ANSWER: The reason we don’t see the 4-d COM Tongues inside of the universe isn’t because they’re not there, but rather, it’s because we’ve got a limited POV that hides the 4-d COM Tongues from our sight. 

Check it out: We’ve deduced (again see Article 6) that a 4-d COM Tongue is integral with an LL PARTICLE BOTTOM. This means that the 4-d COM Tongue is positioned BEHIND the “body” of the LL. And we know that all matter must be comprised-of LLs organized ON TOP of each other (because having a physical barrier to movement in “reverse gear”—having one part of every atom that is Positionally Absolute, and the other atomic constituents, aka the Atomic Mass Part of every atom, being RELATIVE-TO the Positionally Absolute Part—is the only way to keep atoms from literally “falling” *apart* in the absence of applied external Forward-acting force.) This means that WE CAN’T SEE WHAT IS *UNDERNEATH* any LL!  Ergo, the 4-d COM Tongues, being positioned AT THE BOTTOM of the LLs, are HIDDEN FROM OUR VIEW!  But the COM-Tongues are integral with matter that we do see, that’s for sure, and moreover, *we know* that the orientation of an LL’s LADL is going to be identical with the orientation of the LL’s 4-d COM Tongue. 

TEST-DRIVE 6. 

Figure-out how Father Time could get two LLs in the 3-d Backbone Orientation, one-on-top-of-the-other, to move along RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT LADLs, as described in TEST-DRIVE 5, which means that the two LLs would apply forces to each others’ bodies at the LLOff instead of at the midline.

TEST-DRIVE 6 RESULTS: 

It would be similar to playing TETRIS!

INITIALLY, Father Time would LOCATE THE TM PARTICLE COMPASSES having THE SAME NUMBER OR OTHER UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AS THE LLs IN SPACE that needed to be aligned.

PART A. 

If the LLs were not presently lying along the same zero-slope line, then Father Time would proceed to PART B. 

If the LLs were presently lying along the same zero-slope line, then Father Time would follow the steps of PART A before proceeding to PART B.  

PART A FIRST STEP, regarding the LL that would end-up as the Forward-most LL, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to tip the TM in the same Snowman into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A THIRD STEP.)

PART A SECOND STEP, regarding the LL that would end-up as the Backward-most LL, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to tip the TM in the same Snowman into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST DRIVE 4, PART A SECOND STEP.)

PART A THIRD STEP, the LLs would automatically move away from each other by traveling in the 3-d UP direction and the 3-d DOWN direction, respectively, along their own LADLs, until the desired zero-slope line was lying somewhere in-between them. 

PART A FOURTH STEP, Father Time would proceed to PART B.

PART B. 

PART B FIRST STEP, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching, if necessary, to tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Forward-most LL into the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A SECOND STEP.)

PART B SECOND STEP, Father Time would tip the TM in the same Snowman as the Backward-most LL into the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, which would simultaneously cause the LL to tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A THIRD STEP.)

PART B THIRD STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs.

PART B FOURTH STEP, *before* the LLs became aligned along the same zero-slope line, Father Time would use 3-d Mindful Stretching to cause the LLs to HEAD TOWARD EACH OTHER ALONG PARALLEL LINES OF ZERO-SLOPE (defined by their LADLs) in *different directions 180 degrees apart* (see TEST-DRIVE 4, PART A FIFTH STEP.) 

PART B FIFTH STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another until both LLs were positioned in-between the same two ADL Backbones.

PART B SIXTH STEP, Father Time would cease 3-d Mindful Stretching. 

This would cause the TM in the same Snowman as the Forward-most LL to return to the UD ADL Backbone Orientation, and the LL would simultaneously tip UD into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see PART B FIRST STEP.) 

Likewise, the TM in the same Snowman as the Backward-most LL would return to the UU ADL Backbone Orientation, and the LL would simultaneously tip UU into the 3-d Backbone Orientation (see PART B SECOND STEP.)

NOTE that the LLs start “re-turning” to the 3-d Backbone Orientation while they are moving in opposite 3-d directions on parallel zero-slope lines, and they would both have the same turn-radius (see TEST-DRIVE 1) because they are starting their turns and ending their turns in opposite 3-d directions.

This means that the LLs will end-up one-on-top-of-the-other along RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT lines, which will be parallel, with the LLOff between the LADLs.

PART B SEVENTH STEP, the LLs would automatically head toward one another by traveling in the 3-d DOWN direction and the 3-d UP direction, respectively, along their own LADLs, separated by the LLOff distance. 

NOTE that it would be possible to get ONE OF THE LLs TO FOLLOW THE OTHER in the 3-d Backbone Orientation by turning one TM around 180 degrees after PART B SIXTH STEP. 

ALSO NOTE that it would be possible to get two LLs to MOVE AWAY FROM EACH OTHER in the 3-d Backbone Orientation by turning both TMs around 180 degrees after PART B SIXTH STEP.

The End of TEST-DRIVE 6!

TEST-DRIVE 7: 

The “driving” is done, and now we’ve got to answer some questions about performance. 

QUESTION: When an LL’s LADL is tilted in a 3-d direction on the LL PARTICLE COMPASS, are the FORCES of (1) FfSet and (2) the wave-energy that’s being emitted through the open door in the Forward direction along the LL’s LADL always being applied-in a 3-d Forward direction upon other LLs?

ANSWER: Yes.

That’s a corollary to what we showed in TEST-DRIVE 5—we showed that it’s impossible for two LLs to apply 4-d force to each other—because the only way to do that would be for the two LLs to get into the ADL Backbone Orientation ALONG THE SAME ADL of a Snowman of God, which LLs cannot do, because every LL is from a different Snowman, and the ADL Backbones of the Snowmen are all RELATIVE-TO the 6-d COM (which means RELATIVE-TO EACH OTHER)! 

The best two LLs can do is to GET BETWEEN the ADLs of the same two Snowmen of God, which leaves their LADLs RELATIVELY COINCIDENT (in 3-d) and then the LLs will be applying force to each other’s bodies at the LLOff—with the LLOff being less than one particle-width (in other words, there is less than one particle-width between the LADLs)—so the LADLs will NOT OVERLAP, they will be parallel. 

QUESTION: But how is that answer consistent with the results of TEST-DRIVE 2 and TEST-DRIVE 3, in which we saw LLs having ABSOLUTELY COINCIDENT (which means OVERLAPPING) LADLs when their LADLs are NOT in the 3-d Backbone Orientation? 

ANSWER: It is consistent. The reason why two LLs can have ABSOLUTELY COINCIDENT LADLs when they are NOT in the 3-d Backbone Orientation is because the LADLs are both TILTED in the same or in the opposite 3-d Forward direction, which means means they’re applying force ALONG THE SAME 3-d LINE, and a 3-d LINE cannot apply force in the 4-d Forward direction or in the 5-d Backward direction, by definition!

QUESTION: But what about an LL’s rotational force of Fmass(L)? Wouldn’t the physical forces that LLs applied to each other along 3-d lines have to change the magnitude and direction of Fmass(L)? 

ANSWER: No. THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OF FMASS(L) IS AN ETERNAL CONSTANT OF AN LL’S *EXISTENCE* IN THE 4-d LIGHT PART OF GOD. 

Fmass(L) doesn’t “come from” the LL, it comes-from the 4-d COM Segment, which remains in 4-d, so Fmass(L) cannot be ACTED-ON *except* by a higher dimension particle, i.e., a 5-d Gravityne or a 6-d Timeyne in the same Snowman of God. And as we saw in Article 6, THE MAGNITUDE OF ALL PHYSICAL FORCES IN A SNOWMAN OF GOD IS CONSTANT, and the only variable physical force is THE DIRECTION OF Ft, which can either be applied in the 5-d Backward direction (if the TM is tipped UD) or in the 4-d Forward direction (if the TM is tipped UU.) That’s the beauty of Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching! It doesn’t change Fmass(T)! 

And here’s the other beautiful thing: The physical collisions between LLs are THE SAME IN-PRINCIPLE as Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching! 

They both have the same effect, to wit: *Changing the TILT of the line* along which a particle *experiences* the constant rotational force of Fmass! 

So TO REPEAT THIS EXCITING INFORMATION: Physical collisions between LLs *can change the line* (that’s the LADL) along which the LLs *experience* the constant rotational force of Fmass(L)! 

More specifically, external physical forces applied to an LL along 3-d lines can change an LL’s experience of how the rotational force of Fmass(L) is BALANCED around the rotation axis, which is the LADL. Then the LADL has to TILT to a position where the LL experiences BALANCED rotational force of Fmass(L), with the tilting being automatic and necessary so that the Natural particle-force and the Natural direction of rotation—both of which are expressed along the LADL—remain constant.

QUESTION: But if BOTH (1) the external physical forces that LLs apply to each other, and (2) Father Time’s 3-d Mindful Stretching of TMs, can change the TILT of the line (that’s the LADL) along which an LL *experiences* the constant rotational force of Fmass(L), then ARE OTHER LLs AND TMs COMPETING WITH EACH OTHER TO CONTROL THE TILT OF ANY GIVEN LL’s LADL (i.e., to control the 3-d Forward direction in which the LADL is pointing)?  

ANSWER: No, because Father Time is controlling all the TMs of all the LLs, so it’s more like A CALCULATION that Father Time has to do—he has to keep-track of what he did BEFORE NOW—to determine how to get the NET FORCE (FfSet) experienced by any given LL to be what it needs to be NOW.

QUESTION: But what about the MASS of an LL? Wouldn’t excess wave-energy that LLs applied to each other along 3-d lines have to change LL mass IF THE LLs DID NOT HAVE AN OPEN DOOR THROUGH WHICH TO DUMP THE EXCESS WAVE-ENERGY (see Article 6, STEP 11E)? And if so, then wouldn’t that cause a NON-CONSTANT MASS situation to arise within the Snowman of God and AUTOMATICALLY CAUSE ALL THREE PARTICLES IN THE SAME SNOWMAN TO CEASE TO EXIST, so that the LL would becoming a POX, aka a MASSLESS ANTI-PARTICLE, in Space (again see Article 6, STEP 11E)?

ANSWER: Yes. And that “design constraint” will limit our options when we’re trying to explain how LLs are arranged to form atoms. 

But right away we NOTICE the silver lining to that dark cloud: POXes could serve the function of DUMPING GROUNDS for wave-energy for the same reason that the “nothing in Reality” behind the 6-d COM Segments serves as a dumping ground for Et when TMs are tipped UU (see THE BIG BANG diagram in Article 6, STEP 18) AND for the same reason that the 4-d Forward direction in-front-of the Lumeynes always serves as a dumping ground for Ef(OPPFg) and sometimes serves as a dumping ground for Ef(OPPFt) (again see THE BIG BANG diagram in Article 6, STEP 18, and also see THE SLEEPING GIANT diagram in Article 6 STEP 10), to wit: It’s 100 possible to put an infinite amount of *something* on “nothing” (non-existence, e.g., a direction OR A POX)! 

So in theory, MULTIPLE LLs could apply wave-energy to the same POX from different 3-d Forward directions, and in that manner A POX IN BETWEEN LLs could enable LLs to stick together—and even go from moving at the speed of light to STOPPING altogether—by dumping wave-energy onto the POX. 

And also in theory, POX creation within OOIs comprised-of multiple LLs could STOP OR ALTER OOI MOVEMENT AT A DISTANCE by eliminating *the contribution* that the POXed LLs had previously been making to FSet of the OOI in the direction in which the LLs’ LADLs were tilting.

Woot woot!

Conductor: [The Polar Express] Glacier Gulch…just happens to be the steepest downhill grade in the world.

So now we’re READY to think about the general NARRATIVE—I am calling it the Ready Set Go Moving Process (aka Newton’s First, Second and Third Laws of Motion)—that is applicable to every “moving experience” analysis.

Right NOW, every LL in the universe is GO!ing (or attempting to GO!) in either the 3-d UP or the 3-d DOWN direction along its own LADL, according to its Set NET FORCE, FfSet, which the LL is NOW applying to other LLs. Also right NOW, the COM of every atom, molecule and object (aka object-of-interest, or OOI) comprised-of LLs is GO!ing (or attempting to GO!) in either the 3-d UP or the 3-d DOWN direction along its own OOI ABSOLUTE DIRECTION LINE, or OADL, according to its Set NET FORCE, FSet, which the OOI is NOW applying to other OOIs. 

But BEFORE NOW—once upon a time—the LLs and the OOIs were also doing something with a certain FfSet and FSet, respectively (let’s call those respective forces FfSetB and FSetB).

So the Ready state with which the LL or the OOI arrives into NOW—meaning the FfSetB that the LL had BEFORE NOW and the FSetB that the OOI had BEFORE NOW—is relevant information.

FfSetB and FSetB are relevant because there are two different types of motion.

(1) The first type of motion is inertial motion, aka constant-velocity motion, including “rest,” which occurs according to Newton’s First Law of Motion, F = mv (which the in case of LLs can be reduced-to E = c; see Article 6, STEP 19C and STEP 20), and CONTINUES EVEN IN THE ABSENCE OF EXTERNAL PHYSICAL FORCE unless a new unbalanced external physical force is applied.

In Article 6 (see STEP 11C and STEP 19C) we saw THE FULL EXPLANATION FOR NEWTON’S FIRST LAW OF MOTION, i.e., WHY AN OBJECT AT-REST STAYS AT-REST AND AN OBJECT IN-MOTION STAYS IN-MOTION UNTIL AN UNBALANCED EXTERNAL FORCE ACTS UPON IT, to wit: 

Because an LL always has Natural and constant Fmass(L)—Fmass(L) is an LL’s  “idling” energy, constantly being expressed as wave-particle duality—and then *additionally* an LL is always experiencing the EXTERNAL physical forces of both the Gravityne’s Fg and the TM’s Ft, so therefore an LL is ALWAYS “IN GEAR,” never “in neutral”! 

This means that WHATEVER HAPPENED BEFORE NOW to get an LL into motion (or into rest) is what got the LL GO!ing like it is NOW, and so the LL is going to *keep GO!ing* like it is NOW—because again, THE LL IS IN GEAR and GO!ing NOW, even if it’s “just sitting there”—until another LL comes-along and applies a force that changes what it’s doing NOW.

(2) The second type of motion is accelerated motion, which occurs according to either:

(a) Newton’s Second Law of Motion, F = ma (which is not applicable to LLs), when external physical force is applied in the same direction for two or more consecutive NOWs,

or 

(b) gravitational acceleration (which only occurs when one OOI that is in-orbit around another OOI is FREE-FALLING toward the orbited OOI, so we can’t discuss gravitational acceleration until we figure-out the cause of orbiting, and obviously we can’t even speculate about the cause of orbiting until we have explained how atom OOIs are built.) 

We haven’t tried to build an atom OOI yet, but before we do, let’s REVIEW the information we’ve collected about atoms so far.

(1) RECALL (see Article 3 and TEST-DRIVE 5) that the POSITIONALLY ABSOLUTE PART of an atom—the atom’s COM, which is the origin of the atom—is always going to be the Backward-most part of the atom (because having a physical barrier to movement in “reverse gear”—having one part of every atom that is Positionally Absolute, and the other atomic constituents, aka the Atomic Mass Part of every atom, being RELATIVE-TO the Positionally Absolute Part—is the only way to keep atoms from literally “falling” *apart* in the absence of applied external Forward-acting force), and that’s why we say that the Atomic Mass Part of the atom is POSITIONALLY RELATIVE-TO the COM, i.e., because THE COM IS BLOCKING THE BACKWARD PATH of the Atomic Mass Part; ergo, the COM is the only part of the atom that will move in the 3-d UP direction and the 3-d DOWN direction along the OADL, with the Atomic Mass Part of the atom moving in *one or more* 3-d Forward directions (depending-on how many LLs the atom has and how the LLs are arranged) as the COM moves UP and DOWN along the OADL.

(2) ALSO RECALL the discussion of atom OOI COLLISIONS from Article 3.

(3) If atoms have ABSOLUTELY COINCIDENT OADLs, then when the OADLs OVERLAP and the atoms apply forces to each others’ ATOMIC MASS PARTS, the atoms will also have to experience the applied forces on their COMs, ALONG THE SAME LINE AS THE OADL.

(4) If atoms have NON-ABSOLUTELY-COINCIDENT OADLs that are PARALLEL (and therefore NOT OVERLAPPING), then there will be an *offset* between the atoms’ COMs, which is analogous to LLOff between LADLs of LLs—so let’s call it an Atomic OADL Offset, or AOOff—and the AOOff is simply the distance between the OADLs, which can be expressed in particle-widths (3-d Forward degrees.) 

(5) OADLs of atoms having a different number or arrangement of LLs (non-identical atoms, in other words) cannot have ABSOLUTELY-COINCIDENT OADLs, so as between non-identical atoms with parallel OADLs, there will be an AOOff between non-identical atoms’ COMs/OADLS, and the AOOff might be either: (a) less than one particle-width or (b) greater than or equal-to one particle-width.

(6) If the AOOff between two OADLs is *less than one particle-width* (less than one 3-d Forward degree), then we would say that the OADLs are RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT, and when the atoms apply forces to each others’ ATOMIC MASS PARTS, the atoms will also have to experience the applied forces on their COMs, AT THE POSITION OF THE AOOff.

(7) When atoms are in the 3-d Backbone Orientation with their COMs positioned one-over-the-other, then their OADLs are RELATIVELY-COINCIDENT (see (6).) 

(8) If the AOOff between two OADLs is *greater than or equal-to one particle-width* (greater than or equal-to one 3-d Forward degree), then when the atoms apply forces to each others’ Atomic Mass Parts, the atoms will not experience the applied forces on their COMs. 

In joy, Frank